Action for ME
In research, Action for ME stands highest in Health Sciences (#11,088 of 20,462 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#12,188 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #19,430 of 28,054 · #24,720 all time
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #691 of 1,094
- Research works
- 313 ▲ 73% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 6k 19.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 22.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 37% world 28%
What is Action for ME known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #11,088 of 20,462 | 30.2% | 125 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #12,188 of 16,945 | 23.9% | 136 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Action for ME sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 4.0×
- Nursing 3.4×
- Psychology 2.6×
- Energy 2.0×
- Decision Sciences 1.7×
- Social Sciences 1.7×
- Medicine 1.6×
- Arts and Humanities 1.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.9×
- Dentistry 0.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.7×
- Neuroscience 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.5×
- Veterinary 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Engineering 0.0×
Which keywords describe research at Action for ME?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Public Health, Maternal Mortality, Epidemiology, Mental Health, Rural Development, Ethical Considerations, Community Engagement and Community Health Workers.
- Systematic Review
- Public Attitudes
- Health Services
- Territorial Governance
- Mobile Health
- Food Insecurity
- Diagnostic Criteria
- Psychological Distress
- Child Development
- Prevalence
- Social Determinants
- Global Burden
- Neoliberalism
- Community Health Workers
- Social Justice
- Rural Development
- Quality of Life
- Maternal Mortality
- Sustainability
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Mental Health
- Climate Change
- Depression
- Ethical Considerations
- Complications
- Community Engagement
- Health Outcomes
- Social Support
- Political Economy
- Mental Disorders
- Breast Reconstruction
- Chronic Disease
- Anxiety
- Adherence
- Local Development
- Nutritional Consequences
- Complex Systems
- Help-Seeking Behavior
- Stigma
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology5▲ 1.96×29 topics
- Public Health4▲ 4.6×21 topics
- Mental Health3▲ 3.6×15 topics
- Sustainability3▲ 2.2×6 topics
- Climate Change3▲ 1.84×16 topics
- Maternal Mortality3▲ 19×4 topics
- Depression2▲ 4.1×7 topics
- Quality of Life2▲ 2.6×13 topics
- Ethical Considerations2▲ 9.7×6 topics
- Rural Development2▲ 9.5×2 topics
- Complications2▲ 6.3×5 topics
- Social Justice2▲ 5.3×5 topics
- Community Engagement2▲ 9.2×4 topics
- Community Health Workers2▲ 36×2 topics
- Health Outcomes2▲ 11×3 topics
- Neoliberalism2▲ 8.3×3 topics
- Social Support2▲ 5.5×7 topics
- Global Burden2▲ 5.1×5 topics
- Political Economy2▲ 11×3 topics
- Social Determinants2▲ 13×2 topics
- Mental Disorders2▲ 23×2 topics
- Prevalence2▲ 6.7×5 topics
- Breast Reconstruction2▲ 40×2 topics
- Child Development2▲ 6.1×4 topics
- Chronic Disease2▲ 14×2 topics
- Psychological Distress2▲ 9.7×3 topics
- Anxiety1▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Diagnostic Criteria1▲ 11×5 topics
- Adherence1▲ 18×2 topics
- Food Insecurity1▲ 37×1 topic
- Local Development1▲ 19×2 topics
- Mobile Health1▲ 16×2 topics
- Nutritional Consequences1▲ 45×1 topic
- Territorial Governance1▲ 17×2 topics
- Complex Systems1▲ 18×2 topics
- Health Services1▲ 23×2 topics
- Help-Seeking Behavior1▲ 43×1 topic
- Public Attitudes1▲ 43×1 topic
- Stigma1▲ 15×2 topics
- Systematic Review1▲ 40×2 topics
Which research topics does Action for ME publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, French Urban and Social Studies, Mental Health Treatment and Access and Global Maternal and Child Health.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations General Health Professions 1 works
- 2 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 3 Mental Health Treatment and Access Social Psychology 1 works
- 4 Global Maternal and Child Health Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1 works
- 5 Global Educational Policies and Reforms Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 6 Political and Social Issues Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 7 Complex Systems and Decision Making Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
- 8 Rural development and sustainability General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 works
- 9 Religion, Ecology, and Ethics Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 10 Child Nutrition and Water Access Nutrition and Dietetics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Action for ME's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 73% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.