Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Thonon-les-Bains · France

Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques

In research, Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques stands highest in Physical Sciences (#20,102 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.

fr-carrtel.lyon-grenoble.hub.inrae.frROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#37,210
of 42,892
Rank in France
#2,009
of 2,321
Research works
168
▲ 12% vs 2013–17
Citations
2.9k
17.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.1%
record average 16.5%
Open access
20%
world 28%

What is Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Physical SciencesDomain #20,102 of 21,541 14.5%120

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 2.91× its world share, 4 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.07× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Earth and Planetary Sciences: 9.14× its world share, 4 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 1.49× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.13× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 8.10× its world share, 12 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.74× its world share, 1 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 1.54× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.33× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.12× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.35× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.72× its world share, 3 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 9.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques?

Ranked on the composite score, Orlane Anneville, Stéphan Jacquet and Jean François Humbert lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques.

  1. 1 Orlane Anneville France · #78,039 worldwide 265 citations · 31 works
  2. 2 Stéphan Jacquet France · #351,372 worldwide 248 citations · 64 works
  3. 3 Jean François Humbert France · #448,223 worldwide 148 citations · 77 works
  4. 4 Agnès Bouchez France · #519,325 worldwide 102 citations · 41 works
  5. 5 Jean‐Claude Druart France · #578,083 worldwide 37 citations · 18 works
  6. 6 Daniel Gerdeau× France · #586,832 worldwide 67 citations · 50 works
  7. 7 David Étienne France · #660,634 worldwide 16 citations · 16 works
  8. 8 Grégory van der Heijden France · #822,092 worldwide 7 citations · 19 works
  9. 9 Frédéric Rimet France · #923,840 worldwide 93 citations · 49 works
  10. 10 Bernard Montuelle France · #1,095,391 worldwide 39 citations · 35 works
All ranked researchers at Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques

Which keywords describe research at Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Invasive Species, DNA Barcoding, Fisheries Sustainability, Habitat Fragmentation, Biodiversity, Conservation Genetics and Freshwater Biodiversity.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 26 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 26 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change8▲ 11×23 topics
  2. Invasive Species4▲ 36×8 topics
  3. DNA Barcoding3▲ 68×3 topics
  4. Fisheries Sustainability3▲ 112×2 topics
  5. Habitat Fragmentation3▲ 44×4 topics
  6. Biodiversity3▲ 13×10 topics
  7. Conservation Genetics2▲ 232×2 topics
  8. Freshwater Biodiversity2▲ 136×2 topics
  9. Conservation Challenges2▲ 163×1 topic
  10. Flow Regulation2▲ 163×1 topic
  11. Environmental DNA2▲ 388×1 topic
  12. Metabarcoding2▲ 388×1 topic
  13. Phylogenetic Analysis2▲ 21×4 topics
  14. Genetic Diversity2▲ 12×3 topics
  15. Holocene2▲ 49×2 topics
  16. Sea Level2▲ 59×2 topics
  17. Biogeography1▲ 18×5 topics
  18. Sustainability1▲ 1.88×5 topics
  19. Environmental Impact1▲ 2.5×7 topics
  20. Hydrology1▲ 32×2 topics
  21. Methane Emissions1▲ 77×2 topics
  22. Glacial Cycles1▲ 58×1 topic
  23. Paleoclimatology1▲ 46×1 topic
  24. Experimental Tools1▲ 266×1 topic
  25. Molecular Phylogeny1▲ 23×3 topics
  26. Smartphones1▲ 107×1 topic

Which research topics does Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research and Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies.

Fish Ecology and Managem…2Fish Ecology and Management Studies: 2 fractional worksEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies: 2 fractional worksGeology and Paleoclimatology Research: 1 fractional worksExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies: 1 fractional worksDiatoms and Algae Research: 1 fractional worksInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology: 1 fractional worksIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs: 1 fractional worksMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology: 1 fractional worksPacific and Southeast Asian Studies: 1 fractional worksEchinoderm biology and ecology: 1 fractional works
Nature and Landscape ConservationEcologyAtmospheric ScienceStatistical and Nonlinear Physics5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Fish Ecology and Management Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 2 works
  2. 2 Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies Ecology 2 works
  3. 3 Geology and Paleoclimatology Research Atmospheric Science 1 works
  4. 4 Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1 works
  5. 5 Diatoms and Algae Research Biomaterials 1 works
  6. 6 Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1 works
  7. 7 Island Studies and Pacific Affairs Demography 1 works
  8. 8 Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology Ecology 1 works
  9. 9 Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies Geography, Planning and Development 1 works
  10. 10 Echinoderm biology and ecology Aquatic Science 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available20.1%not open79.9%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors16.8%domestic only83.2%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 12% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.