Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Lille · ??

Centre de Recherche Droits et Perspectives du droit

crdp.univ-lille.frROR OpenAlex
Research works
80
▲ 129% vs 2013–17
Citations
46
0.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.7%
record average 16.5%
Open access
6%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Centre de Recherche Droits et Perspectives du droit is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Computer Science: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEnvironmental Science: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 10.98× its world share, 5 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 1.89× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.07× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.99× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 4.07× its world share, 8 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 11.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Centre de Recherche Droits et Perspectives du droit?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Community Engagement, Territorial Governance, Social Determinants of Health, Mental Health, Palliative Care, Psychological Trauma, Healthcare Legislation and Patient Rights.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Community Engagement12▲ 50×2 topics
  2. Territorial Governance12▲ 106×2 topics
  3. Social Determinants of Health10▲ 58×3 topics
  4. Mental Health10▲ 11×5 topics
  5. Palliative Care9▲ 70×2 topics
  6. Psychological Trauma9▲ 144×2 topics
  7. Healthcare Legislation9▲ 155×1 topic
  8. Patient Rights9▲ 115×1 topic
  9. Public Policy8▲ 24×3 topics
  10. Economic Development8▲ 14×3 topics
  11. Public Health8▲ 7.0×2 topics
  12. Institutionalization7▲ 93×2 topics
  13. Healthcare Policy7▲ 120×1 topic
  14. Inequalities7▲ 243×1 topic
  15. Social Innovation7▲ 71×1 topic
  16. Solidarity Economy7▲ 134×1 topic
  17. Religion6▲ 13×2 topics
  18. Sustainable Development6▲ 6.7×6 topics
  19. Human Rights6▲ 9.0×13 topics
  20. Social Justice5▲ 13×2 topics
  21. Citizen Participation5▲ 57×1 topic
  22. Environmental Participation5▲ 71×1 topic
  23. Healthcare5▲ 8.4×2 topics
  24. Aging5▲ 11×1 topic
  25. Elderly5▲ 24×1 topic
  26. Social Change4▲ 43×2 topics
  27. Cultural Studies4▲ 14×3 topics
  28. Identity4▲ 7.1×3 topics
  29. Regulation4▲ 8.5×5 topics
  30. History4▲ 6.2×2 topics
  31. Colonialism4▲ 9.7×8 topics
  32. Hermeneutics4▲ 60×1 topic
  33. Narrative4▲ 33×1 topic
  34. Democracy4▲ 12×3 topics
  35. Gender Equality3▲ 21×4 topics
  36. Healthcare Access3▲ 22×2 topics
  37. European Union3▲ 16×9 topics
  38. Community Development3▲ 21×2 topics
  39. Family Support Policies3▲ 189×1 topic
  40. Migration3▲ 12×2 topics

Which research topics does Centre de Recherche Droits et Perspectives du droit publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Healthcare Systems and Practices, Health, Medicine and Society, Social Sciences and Governance and French Urban and Social Studies.

Healthcare Systems and P…2Healthcare Systems and Practices: 2 fractional worksHealth, Medicine and Society: 2 fractional worksSocial Sciences and Governance: 2 fractional worksFrench Urban and Social Studies: 1 fractional worksMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender: 1 fractional worksEuropean and Internation…1European and International Contract Law: 1 fractional worksAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues: 1 fractional worksSocial Policies and Family: 0 fractional worksHermeneutics and Narrative Identity: 0 fractional worksPolitical and Social Issues: 0 fractional works
General Health ProfessionsUrban StudiesSociology and Political SciencePolitical Science and International Relations2 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Healthcare Systems and Practices General Health Professions 2 works
  2. 2 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 2 works
  3. 3 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 2 works
  4. 4 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  5. 5 Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  6. 6 European and International Contract Law Law 1 works
  7. 7 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 1 works
  8. 8 Social Policies and Family Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  9. 9 Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity Philosophy 0 works
  10. 10 Political and Social Issues Political Science and International Relations 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available6.2%not open93.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors1.5%domestic only98.5%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Centre de Recherche Droits et Perspectives du droit's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 129% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Lille

All research institutions in Lille

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.