Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Institution · Japaratinga · Brazil

Centro Internacional de Semiótica e Comunicação

ciseco.org.brROR OpenAlex
Research works
101
▲ 30% vs 2013–17
Citations
59
0.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
96%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Centro Internacional de Semiótica e Comunicação is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.42× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEnvironmental Science: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.84× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsArts and Humanities: 6.65× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.25× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 4.16× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.99× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 4.85× its world share, 10 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 6.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Centro Internacional de Semiótica e Comunicação?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Cultural Studies, Cultural Identity, Anthropology, Colonialism, Media Studies, Social Media and Public Policy.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Globalization21▲ 11×17 topics
  2. Cultural Studies17▲ 45×15 topics
  3. Cultural Identity16▲ 36×7 topics
  4. Anthropology14▲ 142×5 topics
  5. Colonialism13▲ 27×6 topics
  6. Media Studies11▲ 150×3 topics
  7. Social Media9▲ 12×9 topics
  8. Public Policy9▲ 21×11 topics
  9. Identity9▲ 11×8 topics
  10. Brazil9▲ 104×5 topics
  11. Multiculturalism9▲ 56×1 topic
  12. Post-Modernity9▲ 231×1 topic
  13. Communication8▲ 28×5 topics
  14. Education8▲ 5.9×18 topics
  15. Discourse Analysis8▲ 33×7 topics
  16. Social Change8▲ 59×6 topics
  17. Social Movements8▲ 24×7 topics
  18. Educational Technology7▲ 10×7 topics
  19. Teacher Training7▲ 16×5 topics
  20. Online Learning6▲ 14×2 topics
  21. Community Engagement6▲ 20×3 topics
  22. Social Network Analysis6▲ 45×1 topic
  23. WebQuests6▲ 127×1 topic
  24. History6▲ 7.3×7 topics
  25. Qualitative Research6▲ 10×6 topics
  26. Literature6▲ 11×7 topics
  27. Social Dynamics6▲ 81×2 topics
  28. Mediatization5▲ 118×2 topics
  29. Rhetoric5▲ 40×4 topics
  30. Urban Ethnography5▲ 252×1 topic
  31. Youth Culture5▲ 252×1 topic
  32. Culture5▲ 11×4 topics
  33. Innovation5▲ 5.7×10 topics
  34. Journalism5▲ 235×2 topics
  35. Cultural Heritage4▲ 9.8×5 topics
  36. Cultural4▲ 81×1 topic
  37. Digital Age4▲ 230×1 topic
  38. Historiography4▲ 26×4 topics
  39. Africa3▲ 92×2 topics
  40. Censorship3▲ 101×2 topics

Which research topics does Centro Internacional de Semiótica e Comunicação publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies, Social and Political Issues, Religion and Society in Latin America and Gender, Sexuality, and Education.

Cultural, Media, and Lit…2Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies: 2 fractional worksSocial and Political Issues: 1 fractional worksReligion and Society in Latin America: 1 fractional worksGender, Sexuality, and Education: 1 fractional worksPhysical Education and Sports Studies: 1 fractional worksSocial and Economic Solidarity: 1 fractional worksBusiness and Management …1Business and Management Studies: 1 fractional worksUrban and sociocultural …1Urban and sociocultural dynamics: 1 fractional worksMedia and Communication …1Media and Communication Studies: 1 fractional worksBrazilian cultural histo…0Brazilian cultural history and politics: 0 fractional works
PhilosophySociology and Political ScienceGender StudiesInformation Systems and Management2 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies Philosophy 2 works
  2. 2 Social and Political Issues Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  3. 3 Religion and Society in Latin America Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  4. 4 Gender, Sexuality, and Education Gender Studies 1 works
  5. 5 Physical Education and Sports Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  6. 6 Social and Economic Solidarity Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  7. 7 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 1 works
  8. 8 Urban and sociocultural dynamics Urban Studies 1 works
  9. 9 Media and Communication Studies Communication 1 works
  10. 10 Brazilian cultural history and politics Sociology and Political Science 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available95.6%not open4.4%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors25.7%domestic only74.3%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Centro Internacional de Semiótica e Comunicação's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 30% higher than in 2013–2017.

20002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.