Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
- Research works
- 9 ▼ 64% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 358 38.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 35% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Physics and Astronomy, 3.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
Which research topics does Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Trauma and Emergency Care Studies, Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches and Global Health Care Issues.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Effects of Radiation Exposure Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
- 2 Trauma and Emergency Care Studies Emergency Medicine 0 works
- 3 Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
- 4 Global Health Care Issues General Health Professions 0 works
- 5 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 6 Spinal Cord Injury Research Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works
- 7 Brazilian Legal Issues Law 0 works
- 8 German Social Sciences and History Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 9 Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques Radiation 0 works
- 10 European history and politics Political Science and International Relations 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 64% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Short Hills
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.