Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research works
35
▼ 10% vs 2013–17
Citations
676
19.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
27.8%
record average 16.5%
Open access
50%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Cochlear (France) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Neuroscience: 25.43× its world share, 3 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 2.02× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 5.89× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.51× its world share, 1 worksMedicinePsychology: 4.31× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 25.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Cochlear (France)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Hearing Loss, Quality of Life, Speech Perception, Language Development, Cochlear Implants, Cognitive Decline, Neural Plasticity and Cochlear Neuropathy.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 23 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 23 words, with their numbers
  1. Hearing Loss18▲ 344×3 topics
  2. Quality of Life12▲ 25×6 topics
  3. Speech Perception11▲ 307×3 topics
  4. Language Development11▲ 204×2 topics
  5. Cochlear Implants11▲ 696×1 topic
  6. Cognitive Decline11▲ 294×1 topic
  7. Neural Plasticity5▲ 70×2 topics
  8. Cochlear Neuropathy4▲ 349×1 topic
  9. Tinnitus4▲ 349×1 topic
  10. Deep Learning3▲ 4.4×9 topics
  11. Acute Otitis Media3▲ 347×1 topic
  12. Otitis Media3▲ 347×1 topic
  13. Neural Networks3▲ 7.0×4 topics
  14. Bilingualism2▲ 50×2 topics
  15. Language Acquisition2▲ 75×2 topics
  16. Neural Correlates2▲ 67×2 topics
  17. Sign Language2▲ 142×2 topics
  18. Audio-Visual Speech Recognition2▲ 111×1 topic
  19. Deaf Children2▲ 257×1 topic
  20. Gesture2▲ 257×1 topic
  21. Speech Enhancement2▲ 111×1 topic
  22. Health Effects2▲ 7.8×1 topic
  23. Noise Pollution2▲ 113×1 topic

Which research topics does Cochlear (France) publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Speech and Audio Processing, Noise Effects and Management and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics.

  1. 1 Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation Cognitive Neuroscience 2 works
  2. 2 Speech and Audio Processing Signal Processing 1 works
  3. 3 Noise Effects and Management Speech and Hearing 1 works
  4. 4 Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics Sensory Systems 1 works
  5. 5 Hearing Impairment and Communication Developmental and Educational Psychology 1 works
  6. 6 Ear Surgery and Otitis Media Otorhinolaryngology 0 works
  7. 7 Stuttering Research and Treatment Clinical Psychology 0 works
  8. 8 Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility Occupational Therapy 0 works
  9. 9 Phonetics and Phonology Research Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
  10. 10 Neuroscience and Music Perception Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available50.2%not open49.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors70.0%domestic only30.0%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Cochlear (France)'s research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 10% lower than in 2013–2017.

20002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.