Environmental Defense Fund
In research, Environmental Defense Fund stands highest in Physical Sciences (#3,762 of 12,888 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Science — Global and Planetary Change is 28.6× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #5,580 of 28,054 · #7,462 all time
- Rank in United States
- #760 of 4,192
- Research works
- 628 ▲ 45% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 21k 34.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 32.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 47% world 28%
What is Environmental Defense Fund known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #3,762 of 12,888 | 31.4% | 91 | #4911 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Environmental Defense Fund sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Environmental Defense Fund specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Global and Planetary Change takes 28.6× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Global and Planetary ChangeSubfield · 27.9 works29×
- Environmental ScienceField · 59.9 works9.4×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 9.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Environmental Science 9.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 5.3×
- Energy 4.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.8×
- Chemical Engineering 1.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.7×
- Engineering 0.6×
- Health Professions 0.5×
- Social Sciences 0.5×
- Nursing 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.4×
- Decision Sciences 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Psychology 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Environmental Defense Fund?
Ranked on the composite score, Ruben N. Lubowski, Rod Fujita and Nathaniel O. Keohane lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Environmental Defense Fund.
- 1 Ruben N. Lubowski United States · #174,503 worldwide 302 citations · 23 works
- 2 Rod Fujita United States · #315,629 worldwide 231 citations · 17 works
- 3 Nathaniel O. Keohane United States · #329,147 worldwide 165 citations · 16 works
- 4 Steven P. Hamburg United States · #410,553 worldwide 155 citations · 36 works
- 5 Ananya Roy United States · #471,997 worldwide 83 citations · 23 works
- 6 John Balbus United States · #626,958 worldwide 43 citations · 15 works
- 7 Steven R. Koenig United States · #991,165 worldwide 23 citations · 17 works
- 8 Alexander Golub United States · #1,563,321 worldwide 22 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Environmental Defense Fund?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Water Quality, Shale Gas, Emissions, Satellite Observations, Natural Gas, Hydraulic Fracturing and Atmospheric.
- Flood Risk
- Satellite Imagery
- Black Carbon
- Soil Carbon Sequestration
- Fine Particulate Air Pollution
- Global Burden of Disease
- Risk Perception
- Hydrological Modeling
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Resilience
- Air Pollution
- Air Quality
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Remote Sensing
- Global Warming
- Methane
- Hydraulic Fracturing
- Satellite Observations
- Shale Gas
- Water Quality
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Emissions
- Natural Gas
- Atmospheric
- Environmental Impact
- Renewable Energy
- Health Effects
- Vulnerability
- Mortality
- Energy Transition
- Particulate Matter
- Climate Change Adaptation
- Microbial Communities
- Environmental Policy
- Exposure Assessment
- Social-Ecological Systems
- Atmospheric Aerosols
- Fisheries Sustainability
- Disaster Management
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change35▲ 10×53 topics
- Water Quality12▲ 24×6 topics
- Sustainability12▲ 3.8×27 topics
- Shale Gas12▲ 72×2 topics
- Emissions11▲ 42×2 topics
- Satellite Observations10▲ 81×2 topics
- Natural Gas10▲ 82×2 topics
- Hydraulic Fracturing10▲ 69×2 topics
- Atmospheric10▲ 153×1 topic
- Methane10▲ 153×1 topic
- Environmental Impact8▲ 3.9×16 topics
- Global Warming8▲ 16×10 topics
- Renewable Energy8▲ 4.4×13 topics
- Remote Sensing8▲ 4.8×16 topics
- Health Effects7▲ 9.3×7 topics
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions7▲ 20×6 topics
- Vulnerability7▲ 24×7 topics
- Air Quality6▲ 26×5 topics
- Mortality6▲ 8.0×4 topics
- Air Pollution6▲ 35×3 topics
- Energy Transition5▲ 28×3 topics
- Resilience5▲ 8.1×4 topics
- Particulate Matter5▲ 25×2 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation5▲ 10×8 topics
- Climate Change Adaptation5▲ 22×3 topics
- Hydrological Modeling4▲ 14×3 topics
- Microbial Communities4▲ 7.9×3 topics
- Risk Perception4▲ 13×3 topics
- Environmental Policy4▲ 16×3 topics
- Global Burden of Disease4▲ 13×2 topics
- Exposure Assessment4▲ 31×1 topic
- Fine Particulate Air Pollution4▲ 31×1 topic
- Social-Ecological Systems4▲ 22×2 topics
- Soil Carbon Sequestration4▲ 37×2 topics
- Atmospheric Aerosols4▲ 49×1 topic
- Black Carbon4▲ 49×1 topic
- Fisheries Sustainability4▲ 31×2 topics
- Satellite Imagery4▲ 21×2 topics
- Disaster Management3▲ 18×2 topics
- Flood Risk3▲ 34×1 topic
Which research topics does Environmental Defense Fund publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols and Flood Risk Assessment and Management.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics Global and Planetary Change 10 works
- 2 Air Quality and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 4 works
- 3 Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols Atmospheric Science 4 works
- 4 Flood Risk Assessment and Management Global and Planetary Change 3 works
- 5 Climate Change Policy and Economics Economics and Econometrics 3 works
- 6 Sustainability and Climate Change Governance Global and Planetary Change 3 works
- 7 Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics Soil Science 3 works
- 8 Marine and fisheries research Global and Planetary Change 3 works
- 9 Coastal and Marine Management Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
- 10 Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis Mechanics of Materials 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Environmental Defense Fund's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 45% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in New York
- Columbia University
- New York University
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- City University of New York
- Human Growth Foundation
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
- Rockefeller University
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.