Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Remscheid · Germany

Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe

In research, Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe stands highest in Physical Sciences (#20,710 of 21,541 worldwide) and Engineering (#11,331 of 11,412 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#38,951
of 42,892
Rank in Germany
#1,867
of 2,077
Research works
294
▲ 38% vs 2013–17
Citations
1.1k
3.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.5%
record average 16.5%
Open access
11%
world 28%

What is Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Physical SciencesDomain #20,710 of 21,541 2.6%217
EngineeringField #11,331 of 11,412 2.3%166

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Chemical Engineering: 1.25× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringComputer Science: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.54× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 2.13× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 1.83× its world share, 7 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.11× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 5.99× its world share, 5 worksMaterials ScienceDentistry: 0.90× its world share, 0 worksDentistryMedicine: 0.78× its world share, 4 worksMedicineVeterinary: 1.60× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 2.08× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.32× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.92× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 1.25× its world share, 4 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Materials Science, 6.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe?

Ranked on the composite score, Eginhard Barz, Wolfgang Schütte and Helmut Huber lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe.

  1. 1 Eginhard Barz Germany · #547,571 worldwide 5 citations · 18 works
  2. 2 Wolfgang Schütte Germany · #782,639 worldwide 4 citations · 15 works
  3. 3 Helmut Huber Germany · #1,201,036 worldwide 50 citations · 20 works
  4. 4 Alexander Czechowicz Germany · #1,409,386 worldwide 9 citations · 15 works
  5. 5 Sven Langbein Germany · #1,521,252 worldwide 6 citations · 16 works
All ranked researchers at Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe

Which keywords describe research at Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Microstructure, Additive Manufacturing, Biomedical Applications, Martensitic Transformation, Shape Memory Alloys, Legal Methodology, Party Competition and Mechanical Properties.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 9 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 9 words, with their numbers
  1. Microstructure6▲ 45×6 topics
  2. Additive Manufacturing6▲ 73×4 topics
  3. Biomedical Applications6▲ 18×6 topics
  4. Martensitic Transformation4▲ 1130×1 topic
  5. Shape Memory Alloys4▲ 1130×1 topic
  6. Legal Methodology3▲ 706×1 topic
  7. Party Competition3▲ 1109×1 topic
  8. Mechanical Properties2▲ 7.8×6 topics
  9. 3D Printing1▲ 17×2 topics

Which research topics does Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations, Law and Political Science, Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies and Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes.

  1. 1 Shape Memory Alloy Transformations Materials Chemistry 4 works
  2. 2 Law and Political Science Law 3 works
  3. 3 Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies Automotive Engineering 1 works
  4. 4 Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes Mechanical Engineering 1 works
  5. 5 Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  6. 6 Byzantine Studies and History Classics 0 works
  7. 7 Renewable energy and sustainable power systems Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 0 works
  8. 8 German Literature and Culture Studies Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  9. 9 Classical Antiquity Studies Anthropology 0 works
  10. 10 Soft Robotics and Applications Biomedical Engineering 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available10.7%not open89.3%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors5.7%domestic only94.3%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 38% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Remscheid

All research institutions in Remscheid

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.