Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
In research, Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments stands highest in Health Sciences (#19,544 of 20,462 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #31,528 of 42,892
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #1,699 of 2,253
- Research works
- 395 ▼ 53% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.8k 9.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 36% world 28%
What is Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #19,544 of 20,462 | 13.6% | 123 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 7.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 7.0×
- Veterinary 5.3×
- Arts and Humanities 5.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5.2×
- Engineering 1.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.3×
- Social Sciences 1.3×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Medicine 0.6×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments?
Ranked on the composite score, Michael Balls and Robert D. Combes lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments.
- 1 Michael Balls United Kingdom · #183,100 worldwide 245 citations · 108 works
- 2 Robert D. Combes United Kingdom · #255,540 worldwide 65 citations · 33 works
Which keywords describe research at Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Innovation, Structural Engineering, Sustainable Development, Scientific History, Technological Development, Quality Assessment, Clinical Guidelines and Credit Spread Changes.
- Territorial Governance
- Information Technology
- Environmental Participation
- Credit Spread Changes
- Technological Development
- Structural Engineering
- Sustainable Development
- Innovation
- Globalization
- Scientific History
- Clinical Guidelines
- Default Risk
- Guideline Development
- Quality Assessment
- Value Chains
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 15 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 15 words, with their numbers
- Innovation2▲ 7.0×2 topics
- Sustainable Development2▲ 4.6×4 topics
- Globalization1▲ 3.6×6 topics
- Structural Engineering1▲ 135×2 topics
- Scientific History1▲ 132×1 topic
- Technological Development1▲ 132×1 topic
- Clinical Guidelines1▲ 17×1 topic
- Credit Spread Changes1▲ 462×1 topic
- Default Risk1▲ 462×1 topic
- Environmental Participation1▲ 62×1 topic
- Guideline Development1▲ 238×1 topic
- Information Technology1▲ 10×1 topic
- Quality Assessment1▲ 28×2 topics
- Territorial Governance1▲ 39×1 topic
- Value Chains1▲ 266×1 topic
Which research topics does Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis, Clinical practice guidelines implementation, Corporate Governance and Management and Credit Risk and Financial Regulations.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis History and Philosophy of Science 1 works
- 2 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 3 Corporate Governance and Management Strategy and Management 1 works
- 4 Credit Risk and Financial Regulations Finance 1 works
- 5 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 6 Seismic Performance and Analysis Civil and Structural Engineering 1 works
- 7 Structural Load-Bearing Analysis Civil and Structural Engineering 1 works
- 8 Simulation Techniques and Applications Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
- 9 Historical Art and Culture Studies Museology 0 works
- 10 Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 53% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Nottingham
- University of Nottingham
- Nottingham Trent University
- Queen's Medical Centre
- British Geological Survey
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Nottingham City Hospital
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
- Quotient Clinical (United Kingdom)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.