Fundação Educacional de Ituverava
In research, Fundação Educacional de Ituverava stands highest in Agricultural and Biological Sciences (#5,106 of 6,031 worldwide), Life Sciences (#13,768 of 14,347 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#16,903 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #38,140 of 42,892
- Rank in Brazil
- #719 of 870
- Research works
- 489 ▼ 47% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 827 1.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 46% world 28%
What is Fundação Educacional de Ituverava known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological SciencesField | #5,106 of 6,031 | 2.3% | 123 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #13,768 of 14,347 | 2.4% | 158 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #16,903 of 16,945 | 1.5% | 188 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Fundação Educacional de Ituverava sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 20.9×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Veterinary 20.9×
- Social Sciences 3.4×
- Decision Sciences 2.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.9×
- Arts and Humanities 1.7×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.6×
- Health Professions 1.2×
- Medicine 0.9×
- Environmental Science 0.7×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.4×
- Dentistry 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Fundação Educacional de Ituverava?
Ranked on the composite score, Rita Maria dos Santos Puga Barbosa, Sílvio de Paula Mello and Maria Amália Brunini lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Fundação Educacional de Ituverava.
- 1 Rita Maria dos Santos Puga Barbosa Brazil · #930,737 worldwide 0 citations · 23 works
- 2 Sílvio de Paula Mello Brazil · #935,977 worldwide 13 citations · 15 works
- 3 Maria Amália Brunini Brazil · #1,160,477 worldwide 9 citations · 21 works
- 4 Aline Gomes de Campos Brazil · #1,408,870 worldwide 11 citations · 24 works
Which keywords describe research at Fundação Educacional de Ituverava?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Human Rights, Legal Theory, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Healthcare Access, Public Policy, Online Learning and Healthcare.
- Telemedicine
- Sport
- Radiotherapy Physics
- International Migration
- Social Welfare
- Political Economy
- Nursing
- COVID-19
- Cultural Studies
- Globalization
- Distance Education
- Healthcare
- Public Policy
- Constitutional Law
- Legal Theory
- Human Rights
- Civil Rights
- Healthcare Access
- Online Learning
- Legislation
- Training
- Neoliberalism
- Mental Health
- Pragmatics
- Quality of Life
- Quality Assurance
- Dosimetry
- Leisure
- Refugee Law
- Telehealth
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 30 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 30 words, with their numbers
- Human Rights4▲ 14×2 topics
- Legal Theory4▲ 199×2 topics
- Civil Rights4▲ 184×1 topic
- Constitutional Law4▲ 95×1 topic
- Healthcare Access4▲ 44×5 topics
- Public Policy3▲ 23×5 topics
- Online Learning2▲ 9.8×2 topics
- Healthcare2▲ 6.8×2 topics
- Legislation2▲ 40×2 topics
- Distance Education2▲ 31×1 topic
- Training2▲ 30×1 topic
- Globalization2▲ 3.0×3 topics
- Neoliberalism2▲ 16×2 topics
- Cultural Studies2▲ 14×2 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 3.6×2 topics
- COVID-191▲ 3.4×2 topics
- Pragmatics1▲ 29×2 topics
- Nursing1▲ 22×2 topics
- Quality of Life1▲ 3.0×4 topics
- Political Economy1▲ 15×1 topic
- Quality Assurance1▲ 23×2 topics
- Social Welfare1▲ 39×1 topic
- Dosimetry1▲ 50×1 topic
- International Migration1▲ 204×1 topic
- Leisure1▲ 139×1 topic
- Radiotherapy Physics1▲ 84×1 topic
- Refugee Law1▲ 204×1 topic
- Sport1▲ 90×1 topic
- Telehealth1▲ 83×1 topic
- Telemedicine1▲ 27×1 topic
Which research topics does Fundação Educacional de Ituverava publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Brazilian Legal Issues, Academic Research in Diverse Fields, Social and Political Issues and Migration, Racism, and Human Rights.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Brazilian Legal Issues Law 4 works
- 2 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 2 works
- 3 Social and Political Issues Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 4 Migration, Racism, and Human Rights Health 1 works
- 5 Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques Radiation 1 works
- 6 Physical Education and Sports Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 7 Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 8 Public Health in Brazil Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 9 Palliative and Oncologic Care Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 10 Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition Artificial Intelligence 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Fundação Educacional de Ituverava's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 47% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.