- World rank, all time
- #28,463 of 42,892
- Rank in Germany
- #1,332 of 2,077
- Research works
- 130 ▼ 9% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 1.2k 9.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 26% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 12.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 12.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 2.7×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.4×
- Arts and Humanities 1.4×
- Medicine 1.2×
- Neuroscience 1.2×
- Decision Sciences 1.0×
- Social Sciences 0.9×
- Nursing 0.6×
- Psychology 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss?
Ranked on the composite score, Rainer Heß and Matthias Perleth lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss.
- 1 Rainer Heß Germany · #623,381 worldwide 1 citations · 19 works
- 2 Matthias Perleth Germany · #1,176,699 worldwide 20 citations · 22 works
Which keywords describe research at Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Public Health, Healthcare Utilization, Chronic Diseases, Germany, Health Surveys, Quality Assessment, Medical Ethics and Genetic Testing.
- Security Measures
- Legal Reforms
- Prison System
- Youth Offenders
- Participation
- Innovation
- Leadership
- Digitalization
- Outcome Measurement
- Patient Care
- Healthcare
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis
- Practice Recommendations
- Quality of Life
- Reproductive Medicine
- Clinical Guidelines
- Genetic Testing
- Medical Ethics
- Germany
- Healthcare Utilization
- Public Health
- Chronic Diseases
- Health Surveys
- Quality Assessment
- Informed Consent
- Patient Rights
- Telemedicine
- Guideline Development
- Economic Evaluation
- Health Utility Measures
- Rehabilitation
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration
- Quality
- Clinical Trials
- Human Rights
- Governance
- Criminal Law
- Quality Improvement
- Patient Engagement
- Publication Bias
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Public Health16▲ 9.2×11 topics
- Healthcare Utilization15▲ 152×2 topics
- Chronic Diseases14▲ 40×2 topics
- Germany14▲ 362×1 topic
- Health Surveys14▲ 362×1 topic
- Medical Ethics12▲ 54×3 topics
- Quality Assessment12▲ 49×2 topics
- Genetic Testing12▲ 56×3 topics
- Informed Consent12▲ 103×3 topics
- Clinical Guidelines12▲ 29×5 topics
- Patient Rights11▲ 90×1 topic
- Reproductive Medicine11▲ 348×1 topic
- Telemedicine11▲ 82×2 topics
- Quality of Life11▲ 6.3×11 topics
- Guideline Development10▲ 271×1 topic
- Practice Recommendations10▲ 271×1 topic
- Economic Evaluation10▲ 61×2 topics
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis10▲ 95×1 topic
- Health Utility Measures10▲ 95×1 topic
- Healthcare8▲ 8.8×5 topics
- Rehabilitation6▲ 13×4 topics
- Patient Care6▲ 49×3 topics
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration6▲ 63×2 topics
- Outcome Measurement6▲ 258×1 topic
- Quality6▲ 95×1 topic
- Digitalization5▲ 31×2 topics
- Clinical Trials4▲ 5.3×8 topics
- Leadership4▲ 9.7×3 topics
- Human Rights4▲ 3.8×8 topics
- Innovation4▲ 3.5×2 topics
- Governance4▲ 10×1 topic
- Participation4▲ 30×1 topic
- Criminal Law3▲ 25×2 topics
- Youth Offenders3▲ 53×2 topics
- Quality Improvement3▲ 9.8×3 topics
- Prison System3▲ 37×2 topics
- Patient Engagement2▲ 21×2 topics
- Legal Reforms2▲ 178×1 topic
- Publication Bias2▲ 34×2 topics
- Security Measures2▲ 121×1 topic
Which research topics does Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Medical and Health Sciences Research, Health and Medical Studies, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life and Social Policies and Healthcare Reform.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Medical and Health Sciences Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 2 Health and Medical Studies General Health Professions 2 works
- 3 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 4 Social Policies and Healthcare Reform General Health Professions 1 works
- 5 Digital Innovation in Industries Management of Technology and Innovation 1 works
- 6 Public Administration and Political Analysis Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 7 Innovation, Technology, and Society Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 8 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 9 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 1 works
- 10 Child and Adolescent Health General Health Professions 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 9% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Berlin
- Freie Universität Berlin
- Technische Universität Berlin
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
- Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society
- Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing
- Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute
- Robert Koch Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.