Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Government Cost Accounting System (United States)

Research works
22
▼ 23% vs 2013–17
Citations
94
4.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
73%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Government Cost Accounting System (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Computer Science: 1.37× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 5.06× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.02× its world share, 1 worksMedicineNursing: 5.44× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.85× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.55× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 0.58× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.23× its world share, 3 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Nursing, 5.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Government Cost Accounting System (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Religion, Social Change, Cultural Heritage, Digital Pedagogy, Ethics, Globalization, Education and Communication Technology.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 11 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 11 words, with their numbers
  1. Globalization2▲ 3.9×5 topics
  2. Cultural Heritage2▲ 15×4 topics
  3. Religion2▲ 11×2 topics
  4. Social Change2▲ 52×2 topics
  5. Education1▲ 4.8×5 topics
  6. Digital Pedagogy1▲ 740×2 topics
  7. Ethics1▲ 13×2 topics
  8. Communication Technology1▲ 416×1 topic
  9. Literature1▲ 9.0×2 topics
  10. Media1▲ 34×1 topic
  11. Social Media1▲ 5.6×2 topics

Which research topics does Government Cost Accounting System (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Urban and sociocultural dynamics, Central European Literary Studies, Diverse Academic Research Studies and Head and Neck Surgical Oncology.

  1. 1 Urban and sociocultural dynamics Urban Studies 0 works
  2. 2 Central European Literary Studies Anthropology 0 works
  3. 3 Diverse Academic Research Studies Cultural Studies 0 works
  4. 4 Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Surgery 0 works
  5. 5 Education and Cultural Studies Education 0 works
  6. 6 Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies Surgery 0 works
  7. 7 Sinusitis and nasal conditions Otorhinolaryngology 0 works
  8. 8 Theology and Canon Law Studies Religious studies 0 works
  9. 9 Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  10. 10 Language and Culture Linguistics and Language 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available72.6%not open27.4%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors34.8%domestic only65.2%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Government Cost Accounting System (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 23% lower than in 2013–2017.

2005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in San Marcos

All research institutions in San Marcos

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.