Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale
In research, Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale stands highest in Social Sciences (#10,418 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Sociology and Political Science and Psychology — Sociology and Political Science is 8.1× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #27,858 of 28,054 · #32,023 all time
- Rank in France
- #1,384 of 1,422
- Research works
- 664 ▼ 3% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 4.4k 6.6 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 3.4% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 34% world 28%
What is Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #10,418 of 10,521 | 2.7% | 64 | #10051 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Sociology and Political Science takes 8.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield · 25.7 works8.1×
- PsychologyField · 20.2 works7.4×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 7.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 7.4×
- Health Professions 5.3×
- Social Sciences 3.4×
- Arts and Humanities 1.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.7×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Environmental Science 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.2×
- Decision Sciences 0.2×
- Energy 0.1×
- Nursing 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.0×
- Engineering 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale?
Ranked on the composite score, Philippe Sarnin, Bruno Cuvillier and Marc-Éric Bobillier Chaumon lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale.
- 1 Philippe Sarnin France · #389,468 worldwide 21 citations · 23 works
- 2 Bruno Cuvillier France · #397,520 worldwide 8 citations · 28 works
- 3 Marc-Éric Bobillier Chaumon France · #397,879 worldwide 48 citations · 61 works
- 4 Nikos Kalampalikis France · #563,431 worldwide 11 citations · 30 works
- 5 Sabrina Rouat France · #711,239 worldwide 7 citations · 17 works
- 6 Christine Morin‐Messabel France · #735,883 worldwide 1 citations · 16 works
- 7 Tanguy Leroy France · #779,268 worldwide 20 citations · 19 works
- 8 Valérie Haas France · #810,107 worldwide 6 citations · 15 works
- 9 Christine Durif‐Bruckert France · #904,998 worldwide 9 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Clinical Practice, Community Engagement, Group Therapy, Attachment, Childhood Trauma, Developmental Trauma and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.
- Psychotherapy
- Healthcare Legislation
- Palliative Care
- Family Support Policies
- Inequality
- Gender Equality
- Inequalities
- Primary Care
- Public Health
- Economic Development
- Social Innovation
- Sustainable Development
- Public Action
- Gender Studies
- Social Determinants of Health
- Territorial Governance
- Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
- Group Therapy
- Attachment
- Clinical Practice
- Mental Health
- Community Engagement
- Childhood Trauma
- Developmental Trauma
- Local Development
- Public Policy
- Social Justice
- Professional Practices
- Environmental Participation
- Institutionalization
- Solidarity Economy
- Participative Evaluation
- Healthcare Management
- Healthcare Policy
- Healthcare Access
- Community Development
- Intercultural Communication
- Urban Segregation
- Public Health Policy
- Patient Rights
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Mental Health18▲ 14×15 topics
- Clinical Practice13▲ 96×2 topics
- Community Engagement12▲ 41×5 topics
- Attachment12▲ 149×2 topics
- Childhood Trauma12▲ 209×2 topics
- Group Therapy12▲ 352×2 topics
- Developmental Trauma12▲ 549×1 topic
- Psychodynamic Psychotherapy12▲ 549×1 topic
- Local Development11▲ 110×2 topics
- Territorial Governance11▲ 100×2 topics
- Public Policy10▲ 23×5 topics
- Social Determinants of Health8▲ 40×4 topics
- Social Justice8▲ 15×9 topics
- Gender Studies7▲ 54×4 topics
- Professional Practices7▲ 203×1 topic
- Public Action7▲ 203×1 topic
- Environmental Participation6▲ 85×1 topic
- Sustainable Development6▲ 4.3×1 topic
- Institutionalization5▲ 65×2 topics
- Social Innovation5▲ 39×2 topics
- Solidarity Economy5▲ 97×2 topics
- Economic Development5▲ 7.2×1 topic
- Participative Evaluation5▲ 165×1 topic
- Public Health5▲ 3.9×9 topics
- Healthcare Management4▲ 59×2 topics
- Primary Care4▲ 12×3 topics
- Healthcare Policy4▲ 48×1 topic
- Inequalities4▲ 130×1 topic
- Healthcare Access4▲ 16×3 topics
- Gender Equality4▲ 16×4 topics
- Community Development4▲ 23×2 topics
- Inequality4▲ 19×2 topics
- Intercultural Communication4▲ 93×2 topics
- Family Support Policies4▲ 256×1 topic
- Urban Segregation4▲ 256×1 topic
- Palliative Care3▲ 24×2 topics
- Public Health Policy3▲ 13×2 topics
- Healthcare Legislation3▲ 60×1 topic
- Patient Rights3▲ 49×1 topic
- Psychotherapy3▲ 339×2 topics
Which research topics does Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research, Education, sociology, and vocational training, French Urban and Social Studies and Social Sciences and Governance.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research Clinical Psychology 12 works
- 2 Education, sociology, and vocational training Sociology and Political Science 7 works
- 3 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 6 works
- 4 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 5 works
- 5 Healthcare Systems and Practices General Health Professions 4 works
- 6 Social Policies and Family Sociology and Political Science 4 works
- 7 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 3 works
- 8 Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory Sociology and Political Science 3 works
- 9 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 2 works
- 10 Historical and Scientific Studies Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 3% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Lyon
- Laboratoire de Chimie
- École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
- Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
- Hôpital Edouard Herriot
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Université Lumière Lyon 2
- Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités - Lyon St-Étienne
- Université Jean Moulin Lyon III
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.