Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Company · Charlottesville · United States

Indoor Biotechnologies (United States)

In research, Indoor Biotechnologies (United States) stands highest in Medicine (#5,422 of 17,978 worldwide), Health Sciences (#6,823 of 20,462 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#18,080 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.

inbio.comROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#21,148
of 42,892
Rank in United States
#4,564
of 8,685
Research works
385
▼ 19% vs 2013–17
Citations
4.3k
11.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
28%
world 28%

What is Indoor Biotechnologies (United States) known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
MedicineField #5,422 of 17,978 11.6%125
Health SciencesDomain #6,823 of 20,462 12.2%138
Physical SciencesDomain #18,080 of 21,541 8.0%181

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Indoor Biotechnologies (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.78× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.52× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.79× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.67× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.93× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 1.00× its world share, 3 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.20× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.50× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.15× its world share, 8 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 1.87× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.26× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.91× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.43× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 2.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Indoor Biotechnologies (United States)?

Ranked on the composite score, Martin D. Chapman, Anna Pomés and Jill Glesner lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Indoor Biotechnologies (United States).

  1. 1 Martin D. Chapman United States · #102,649 worldwide 430 citations · 105 works
  2. 2 Anna Pomés United States · #699,017 worldwide 74 citations · 47 works
  3. 3 Jill Glesner United States · #1,327,917 worldwide 24 citations · 19 works
  4. 4 Sabina Wünschmann United States · #1,596,747 worldwide 7 citations · 15 works
All ranked researchers at Indoor Biotechnologies (United States)

Which keywords describe research at Indoor Biotechnologies (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Energy Efficiency, Epidemiology, Thermal Comfort, Artificial Neural Networks, Energy Simulation, Building Energy Consumption, Model Predictive Control and Asthma.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology82▲ 5.3×18 topics
  2. Energy Efficiency68▲ 23×10 topics
  3. Thermal Comfort57▲ 174×2 topics
  4. Artificial Neural Networks56▲ 34×2 topics
  5. Energy Simulation54▲ 208×2 topics
  6. Building Energy Consumption54▲ 259×1 topic
  7. Model Predictive Control54▲ 62×1 topic
  8. Climate Change43▲ 4.2×12 topics
  9. Asthma42▲ 86×2 topics
  10. Quality of Life35▲ 6.7×7 topics
  11. Allergen-specific Immunotherapy32▲ 210×1 topic
  12. Pollen Allergy32▲ 210×1 topic
  13. Health Effects26▲ 11×7 topics
  14. Diagnosis24▲ 6.0×6 topics
  15. Management24▲ 7.9×6 topics
  16. Children23▲ 23×3 topics
  17. Prevalence22▲ 15×2 topics
  18. Anaphylaxis22▲ 209×1 topic
  19. Food Allergy22▲ 209×1 topic
  20. Particulate Matter22▲ 50×2 topics
  21. IoT17▲ 21×5 topics
  22. Public Health17▲ 3.3×7 topics
  23. SARS-CoV-216▲ 29×4 topics
  24. COVID-1916▲ 6.2×6 topics
  25. Risk Assessment15▲ 6.7×8 topics
  26. Environmental Monitoring15▲ 12×7 topics
  27. Airborne Transmission14▲ 217×1 topic
  28. Respiratory Viruses14▲ 217×1 topic
  29. Volatile Organic Compounds13▲ 30×3 topics
  30. Mortality13▲ 6.8×2 topics
  31. Air Quality Monitoring13▲ 93×1 topic
  32. Low-Cost Sensors13▲ 93×1 topic
  33. Contact Allergy12▲ 110×1 topic
  34. Skin Sensitization12▲ 110×1 topic
  35. Indoor Air Quality12▲ 84×2 topics
  36. Airborne Microorganisms12▲ 139×1 topic
  37. Mold Exposure12▲ 139×1 topic
  38. Immunology11▲ 23×2 topics
  39. Allergic Diseases10▲ 32×1 topic
  40. Eosinophils10▲ 32×1 topic

Which research topics does Indoor Biotechnologies (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research, Building Energy and Comfort Optimization, Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization and Age of Information Optimization.

Food Allergy and Anaphyl…3Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research: 3 fractional worksBuilding Energy and Comf…2Building Energy and Comfort Optimization: 2 fractional worksAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization: 1 fractional worksAge of Information Optim…1Age of Information Optimization: 1 fractional worksTechnology Use by Older …1Technology Use by Older Adults: 1 fractional worksConsumer Attitudes and F…0Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling: 0 fractional worksCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts: 0 fractional worksInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems: 0 fractional worksAutism Spectrum Disorder Research: 0 fractional worksSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research: 0 fractional works
Immunology and AllergyBuilding and ConstructionComputer Networks and CommunicationsDemography5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research Immunology and Allergy 3 works
  2. 2 Building Energy and Comfort Optimization Building and Construction 2 works
  3. 3 Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization Immunology and Allergy 1 works
  4. 4 Age of Information Optimization Computer Networks and Communications 1 works
  5. 5 Technology Use by Older Adults Demography 1 works
  6. 6 Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  7. 7 COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  8. 8 Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems Aquatic Science 0 works
  9. 9 Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
  10. 10 SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research Infectious Diseases 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available27.7%not open72.3%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors25.1%domestic only74.9%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Indoor Biotechnologies (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 19% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Charlottesville

All research institutions in Charlottesville

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.