Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Institute for Scientific Analysis

World rank, all time
#26,297
of 42,892
Rank in United States
#5,642
of 8,685
Research works
274
▼ 33% vs 2013–17
Citations
5.8k
21.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
27.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
39%
world 28%

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Neuroscience: 1.77× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.73× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.43× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.50× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.93× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.94× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.97× its world share, 3 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.89× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.78× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 5.85× its world share, 3 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.47× its world share, 5 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 5.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Institute for Scientific Analysis?

Ranked on the composite score, Sheigla Murphy, Richard Zurawski and Tamar M. J. Antin lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for Scientific Analysis.

  1. 1 Sheigla Murphy United States · #423,907 worldwide 91 citations · 16 works
  2. 2 Richard Zurawski United States · #967,654 worldwide 20 citations · 17 works
  3. 3 Tamar M. J. Antin United States · #1,178,285 worldwide 26 citations · 15 works
  4. 4 van Sjl Stef Eijndhoven United States · #1,253,286 worldwide 4 citations · 19 works
All ranked researchers at Institute for Scientific Analysis

Which keywords describe research at Institute for Scientific Analysis?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Psychiatric Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, Behavioral Interventions, Impulsivity, Alcohol Dependence, Motivational Interviewing, Substance Abuse and Public Health.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Psychiatric Disorders16▲ 39×4 topics
  2. Epidemiology15▲ 1.34×18 topics
  3. Substance Use Disorders15▲ 79×2 topics
  4. Public Health14▲ 3.8×12 topics
  5. Behavioral Interventions13▲ 50×2 topics
  6. Impulsivity13▲ 84×2 topics
  7. Mental Health13▲ 4.1×20 topics
  8. Alcohol Dependence12▲ 102×1 topic
  9. Motivational Interviewing12▲ 102×1 topic
  10. Globalization12▲ 2.3×19 topics
  11. Substance Abuse11▲ 57×2 topics
  12. HIV7▲ 22×1 topic
  13. Nonlinear Systems7▲ 11×5 topics
  14. drug use7▲ 92×1 topic
  15. Violence7▲ 18×2 topics
  16. History6▲ 3.0×12 topics
  17. Identity6▲ 3.0×11 topics
  18. Social Support6▲ 5.0×5 topics
  19. Neighborhood Effects6▲ 21×3 topics
  20. Social Justice5▲ 3.9×10 topics
  21. Neurobiology5▲ 5.8×5 topics
  22. Stigma5▲ 17×4 topics
  23. Law Enforcement5▲ 42×2 topics
  24. Feminism5▲ 6.3×6 topics
  25. Criminal Behavior4▲ 34×2 topics
  26. Evidence-Based Practice4▲ 9.3×5 topics
  27. Fluid-Structure Interaction4▲ 8.8×5 topics
  28. Stability Analysis4▲ 7.4×4 topics
  29. Youth Violence4▲ 35×3 topics
  30. Cancer Risk4▲ 5.9×3 topics
  31. Developmental Trajectories4▲ 11×3 topics
  32. Criminal Networks4▲ 74×1 topic
  33. Distributed Control4▲ 11×2 topics
  34. Mortality Risk4▲ 7.1×4 topics
  35. Organized Crime4▲ 74×1 topic
  36. Robust Control4▲ 15×2 topics
  37. Functional Analysis4▲ 24×3 topics
  38. Health Care Utilization4▲ 11×3 topics
  39. Homelessness4▲ 33×1 topic
  40. Mental Illness4▲ 20×1 topic

Which research topics does Institute for Scientific Analysis publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies, Education and Islamic Studies, LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy and Smoking Behavior and Cessation.

  1. 1 Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies Strategy and Management 1 works
  2. 2 Education and Islamic Studies Education 1 works
  3. 3 LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy Social Psychology 1 works
  4. 4 Smoking Behavior and Cessation Physiology 1 works
  5. 5 Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology Clinical Psychology 1 works
  6. 6 Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes Epidemiology 1 works
  7. 7 Gender, Feminism, and Media Gender Studies 1 works
  8. 8 Sex work and related issues Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  9. 9 Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics History 0 works
  10. 10 Homelessness and Social Issues General Health Professions 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available39.2%not open60.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors19.8%domestic only80.2%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Institute for Scientific Analysis's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 33% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in San Francisco

All research institutions in San Francisco

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.