Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes
In research, Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes stands highest in Physical Sciences (#2,640 of 21,541 worldwide), Chemistry (#1,043 of 3,369 worldwide) and Earth and Planetary Sciences (#1,389 of 2,661 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #4,003 of 42,892
- Rank in Italy
- #145 of 969
- Research works
- 1.6k ▼ 43% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 42k 27.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 10.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 20% world 28%
What is Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #2,640 of 21,541 | 20.1% | 1,211 | |
| ChemistryField | #1,043 of 3,369 | 19.5% | 289 | |
| Earth and Planetary SciencesField | #1,389 of 2,661 | 18.9% | 285 | |
| EngineeringField | #6,002 of 11,412 | 21.8% | 165 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #3,713 of 6,208 | 24.4% | 153 | |
| Organic ChemistrySubfield | #1,219 of 2,025 | 21.6% | 144 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #10,922 of 14,347 | 18.1% | 155 | |
| Materials ScienceField | #4,182 of 4,504 | 17.1% | 153 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 4.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 4.7×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 4.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.0×
- Decision Sciences 3.7×
- Environmental Science 3.0×
- Social Sciences 1.7×
- Energy 1.3×
- Health Professions 1.0×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.9×
- Neuroscience 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.6×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Nursing 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Psychology 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Dentistry 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes?
Ranked on the composite score, Andrea Meli, Cesare Ravazzi and Gianni Zotti lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes.
- 1 Andrea Meli Italy · #121,385 worldwide 244 citations · 31 works
- 2 Cesare Ravazzi Italy · #286,944 worldwide 198 citations · 45 works
- 3 Gianni Zotti Italy · #338,866 worldwide 355 citations · 51 works
- 4 Fabrizio Zanobini Italy · #349,726 worldwide 213 citations · 32 works
- 5 Sandro Cattarin Italy · #402,672 worldwide 199 citations · 29 works
- 6 Carlo A. Ghilardi Italy · #417,620 worldwide 239 citations · 58 works
- 7 Stefano Midollini Italy · #461,485 worldwide 289 citations · 74 works
- 8 Marco Musiani Italy · #514,173 worldwide 228 citations · 25 works
- 9 Mario Gleria Italy · #540,971 worldwide 112 citations · 34 works
- 10 R. Materassi Italy · #599,137 worldwide 126 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Cultural Heritage, Environmental Impact, Water Quality, Latin America, Globalization, Regional Development, Catholicism and Ethics.
- Redefinition of SI Units
- Measurement Uncertainty
- Integration
- Ethnography
- Rituals
- Colonialism
- Theology
- Social Dynamics
- Cultural Studies
- Territorial Planning
- Migration
- Small and Medium Enterprises
- Catholicism
- Innovation
- Water Quality
- Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Environmental Impact
- Cultural Heritage
- Globalization
- Education
- Sustainable Development
- Latin America
- Regional Development
- Ethics
- Knowledge Economy
- Religion
- Urban Geography
- Industrial Districts
- Territorial Marketing
- Urbanization
- Quality Assurance
- Automation
- European Union
- Landscape Change
- Neuro-Symbolic Networks
- Renewable Energy
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 37 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 37 words, with their numbers
- Cultural Heritage4▲ 18×6 topics
- Environmental Impact3▲ 4.5×11 topics
- Globalization3▲ 3.6×8 topics
- Climate Change2▲ 2.5×22 topics
- Education2▲ 3.5×4 topics
- Sustainability2▲ 2.4×12 topics
- Sustainable Development2▲ 3.6×7 topics
- Water Quality2▲ 14×6 topics
- Latin America2▲ 27×3 topics
- Innovation2▲ 4.8×5 topics
- Regional Development2▲ 13×4 topics
- Catholicism2▲ 121×2 topics
- Ethics2▲ 9.5×2 topics
- Small and Medium Enterprises2▲ 25×3 topics
- Knowledge Economy1▲ 37×2 topics
- Migration1▲ 12×4 topics
- Religion1▲ 8.4×2 topics
- Territorial Planning1▲ 525×1 topic
- Urban Geography1▲ 278×1 topic
- Cultural Studies1▲ 9.7×2 topics
- Industrial Districts1▲ 486×1 topic
- Social Dynamics1▲ 60×1 topic
- Territorial Marketing1▲ 486×1 topic
- Theology1▲ 38×1 topic
- Urbanization1▲ 8.9×3 topics
- Colonialism1▲ 6.5×2 topics
- Quality Assurance1▲ 18×2 topics
- Rituals1▲ 34×2 topics
- Automation1▲ 41×1 topic
- Ethnography1▲ 16×1 topic
- European Union1▲ 12×2 topics
- Integration1▲ 18×2 topics
- Landscape Change1▲ 195×1 topic
- Measurement Uncertainty1▲ 268×1 topic
- Neuro-Symbolic Networks1▲ 1092×1 topic
- Redefinition of SI Units1▲ 268×1 topic
- Renewable Energy1▲ 2.0×3 topics
Which research topics does Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Historical and Environmental Studies, Diverse academic and cultural studies, Religious and Theological Studies and Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Historical and Environmental Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 2 Diverse academic and cultural studies Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 3 Religious and Theological Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 4 Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies Cultural Studies 1 works
- 5 Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 6 Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1 works
- 7 Theology and Canon Law Studies Religious studies 1 works
- 8 Energy, Environment, Economic Growth Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 9 Water Resource Management and Quality Water Science and Technology 0 works
- 10 Historical and Religious Studies of Rome History 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 43% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.