- Research works
- 32 ▼ 50% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 255 7.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 50% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Instituto Politécnico do Rio de Janeiro is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 5.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
Which research topics does Instituto Politécnico do Rio de Janeiro publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Cultural Industries and Urban Development, Geography and Environmental Studies, Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies and Academic Research in Diverse Fields.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Cultural Industries and Urban Development Urban Studies 0 works
- 2 Geography and Environmental Studies Water Science and Technology 0 works
- 3 Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
- 4 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 0 works
- 5 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 0 works
- 6 Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 0 works
- 7 Music and Audio Processing Signal Processing 0 works
- 8 Emotion and Mood Recognition Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
- 9 Fish biology, ecology, and behavior Nature and Landscape Conservation 0 works
- 10 Voice and Speech Disorders Physiology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Instituto Politécnico do Rio de Janeiro's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 50% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.