Inter-Mountain Laboratories (United States)
- Research works
- 37 ▼ 16% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 606 16.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 20.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 44% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Inter-Mountain Laboratories (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 3.9×. Every wedge is a field page.
Which keywords describe research at Inter-Mountain Laboratories (United States)?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Optimization, Gas Sensing, Health Effects, Environmental Impacts, Open Pit Mining, Production Scheduling, Mammal Evolution and Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis.
- nuclear accident
- Nonlinear Optics
- Fukushima Daiichi
- Epidemiology
- Catalysis
- Spectroscopic Databases
- Mammal Evolution
- Production Scheduling
- Environmental Impacts
- Health Effects
- Optimization
- Gas Sensing
- Open Pit Mining
- Climate Change
- Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis
- Terahertz Quantum-Cascade Lasers
- Dehydrogenation
- Fiber Lasers
- Ground-Penetrating Radar
- Sedimentology
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 20 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 20 words, with their numbers
- Optimization2▲ 7.9×3 topics
- Health Effects2▲ 6.7×3 topics
- Gas Sensing1▲ 48×2 topics
- Environmental Impacts1▲ 16×2 topics
- Open Pit Mining1▲ 303×1 topic
- Production Scheduling1▲ 303×1 topic
- Climate Change1◆ 1.11×10 topics
- Mammal Evolution1▲ 101×1 topic
- Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis1▲ 101×1 topic
- Spectroscopic Databases1▲ 51×1 topic
- Terahertz Quantum-Cascade Lasers1▲ 51×1 topic
- Catalysis1▲ 3.3×1 topic
- Dehydrogenation1▲ 27×1 topic
- Epidemiology1▼ 0.70×5 topics
- Fiber Lasers1▲ 19×2 topics
- Fukushima Daiichi1▲ 106×1 topic
- Ground-Penetrating Radar1▲ 59×1 topic
- Nonlinear Optics1▲ 16×2 topics
- Sedimentology1▲ 59×1 topic
- nuclear accident1▲ 106×1 topic
Which research topics does Inter-Mountain Laboratories (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Mobile Agent-Based Network Management, Fire effects on ecosystems, Rangeland and Wildlife Management and Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Mobile Agent-Based Network Management Computer Networks and Communications 0 works
- 2 Fire effects on ecosystems Global and Planetary Change 0 works
- 3 Rangeland and Wildlife Management Ecology 0 works
- 4 Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology Paleontology 0 works
- 5 Sex work and related issues Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 6 Morphological variations and asymmetry Geometry and Topology 0 works
- 7 Primate Behavior and Ecology Social Psychology 0 works
- 8 Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies Gender Studies 0 works
- 9 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 0 works
- 10 Intimate Partner and Family Violence Health 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Inter-Mountain Laboratories (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 16% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Sheridan
- Sheridan College
- Sheridan Memorial Hospital
- Sheridan VA Medical Center
- Kennon (United States)
- Big Horn Valve
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.