Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations
In research, Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations stands highest in Social Sciences (#9,311 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Arts and Humanities — Arts and Humanities is 10.4× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #26,928 of 28,054 · #20,853 all time
- Rank in France
- #1,318 of 1,422
- Research works
- 2.5k ▼ 52% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 7.8k 3.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 26% world 28%
What is Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #9,311 of 10,521 | 8.9% | 99 | #4462 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Arts and Humanities takes 10.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Arts and HumanitiesField · 37.1 works10×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 10.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 10.4×
- Social Sciences 3.2×
- Health Professions 2.8×
- Psychology 2.4×
- Computer Science 1.0×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.6×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
- Nursing 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.0×
- Engineering 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations?
Ranked on the composite score, Lorenza Mondada, Jean-Claude Régnier and Alain Rabatel lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations.
- 1 Lorenza Mondada France · #36,369 worldwide 409 citations · 90 works
- 2 Jean-Claude Régnier France · #56,120 worldwide 413 citations · 176 works
- 3 Alain Rabatel France · #88,583 worldwide 114 citations · 112 works
- 4 Andrée Tiberghien France · #141,478 worldwide 88 citations · 55 works
- 5 Cathy Cohen France · #151,672 worldwide 414 citations · 19 works
- 6 Christiane Marchello-Nizia France · #179,820 worldwide 39 citations · 28 works
- 7 Véronique Traverso France · #214,660 worldwide 87 citations · 57 works
- 8 Christian Plantin France · #245,304 worldwide 15 citations · 42 works
- 9 Jean‐François Le Maréchal France · #281,163 worldwide 44 citations · 32 works
- 10 Jean-Pierre Sautot France · #328,325 worldwide 6 citations · 36 works
Which keywords describe research at Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sociolinguistics, Pragmatics, Multilingualism, Discourse Analysis, Rhetoric, Argumentation, Ethos and Social Justice.
- Anthropology
- Ethnography
- New Media
- Patient Rights
- Palliative Care
- Social Movements
- Cultural Heritage
- Language Policy
- Cultural Studies
- Corpus Linguistics
- Professional Practices
- Gender Studies
- Migration and Integration
- Language Education
- Pedagogy
- Cultural Diversity
- Social Justice
- Argumentation
- Discourse Analysis
- Pragmatics
- Sociolinguistics
- Multilingualism
- Rhetoric
- Ethos
- Educational Technology
- Intercultural Communication
- Didactics
- Learning Strategies
- Globalization
- Educational Policies
- Public Action
- Language Teaching
- Social Interaction
- Language Contact
- Digital Communication
- Cultural Competence
- Healthcare Legislation
- Information Studies
- Political Discourse
- Sociology
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sociolinguistics21▲ 89×8 topics
- Pragmatics19▲ 95×6 topics
- Multilingualism17▲ 83×5 topics
- Discourse Analysis16▲ 52×6 topics
- Rhetoric15▲ 113×3 topics
- Argumentation15▲ 393×1 topic
- Ethos15▲ 393×1 topic
- Social Justice14▲ 20×3 topics
- Educational Technology14▲ 9.4×11 topics
- Cultural Diversity13▲ 49×3 topics
- Intercultural Communication12▲ 219×3 topics
- Pedagogy12▲ 20×5 topics
- Didactics12▲ 98×2 topics
- Language Education12▲ 87×2 topics
- Learning Strategies12▲ 665×1 topic
- Migration and Integration12▲ 665×1 topic
- Globalization9▲ 3.9×19 topics
- Gender Studies9▲ 49×2 topics
- Educational Policies9▲ 61×2 topics
- Professional Practices8▲ 173×1 topic
- Public Action8▲ 173×1 topic
- Corpus Linguistics7▲ 25×5 topics
- Language Teaching6▲ 20×5 topics
- Cultural Studies6▲ 12×14 topics
- Social Interaction5▲ 11×8 topics
- Language Policy5▲ 29×3 topics
- Language Contact5▲ 39×4 topics
- Cultural Heritage4▲ 6.6×6 topics
- Digital Communication4▲ 49×3 topics
- Social Movements4▲ 11×6 topics
- Cultural Competence4▲ 25×3 topics
- Palliative Care4▲ 19×2 topics
- Healthcare Legislation4▲ 48×1 topic
- Patient Rights4▲ 39×1 topic
- Information Studies3▲ 131×1 topic
- New Media3▲ 68×1 topic
- Political Discourse3▲ 148×2 topics
- Ethnography3▲ 15×2 topics
- Sociology3▲ 19×5 topics
- Anthropology3▲ 27×5 topics
Which research topics does Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, French Language Learning Methods, Education, sociology, and vocational training and Health, Medicine and Society.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Philosophy 15 works
- 2 French Language Learning Methods Linguistics and Language 12 works
- 3 Education, sociology, and vocational training Sociology and Political Science 8 works
- 4 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 4 works
- 5 Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts Computer Networks and Communications 3 works
- 6 Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare General Health Professions 3 works
- 7 Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies Linguistics and Language 3 works
- 8 Translation Studies and Practices Language and Linguistics 3 works
- 9 Historical Linguistics and Language Studies Language and Linguistics 3 works
- 10 Semiotics and Representation Studies Literature and Literary Theory 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 52% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Lyon
- Laboratoire de Chimie
- École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
- Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
- Hôpital Edouard Herriot
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Université Lumière Lyon 2
- Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités - Lyon St-Étienne
- Université Jean Moulin Lyon III
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.