- Research works
- 11 ▲ 744% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 195 17.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 57.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 97% world 28%
Not ranked overall: National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 14.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
Which research topics does National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Public Health Policies and Education, Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Data-Driven Disease Surveillance and COVID-19 epidemiological studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Public Health Policies and Education General Health Professions 0 works
- 2 Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 0 works
- 3 Data-Driven Disease Surveillance Epidemiology 0 works
- 4 COVID-19 epidemiological studies Modeling and Simulation 0 works
- 5 Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies Food Science 0 works
- 6 Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout General Health Professions 0 works
- 7 Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works
- 8 COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing Information Systems 0 works
- 9 COVID-19 and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 0 works
- 10 Disaster Response and Management Emergency Medical Services 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 744% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Hamilton
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.