New Hampshire NeuroSpine Institute
- Research works
- 29 ▼ 57% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 708 24.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 4% world 28%
Not ranked overall: New Hampshire NeuroSpine Institute is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
What does New Hampshire NeuroSpine Institute specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Medicine takes 4.7× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- MedicineField · 27.4 works4.7×
- Health SciencesDomain · 27.9 works4.1×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which keywords describe research at New Hampshire NeuroSpine Institute?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Degenerative Disc Disease, Low Back Pain, Spinal Fusion, Surgical Treatment, Clinical Outcomes, Intervertebral Disc, Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Chronic Pain.
- Prevention
- Perioperative Care
- Rotator Cuff Tears
- Shoulder Function
- Surgical Management
- Risk Factors
- Global Burden
- Clinical Trials
- Anterior Cervical Discectomy
- Epidemiology
- Intervertebral Disc
- Surgical Treatment
- Low Back Pain
- Degenerative Disc Disease
- Spinal Fusion
- Clinical Outcomes
- Lumbar Disc Degeneration
- Chronic Pain
- Cervical Spine Surgery
- Disability
- Biomechanics
- Pain Management
- Rehabilitation
- Complications
- Shoulder Pathology
- Postoperative Pain
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 26 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 26 words, with their numbers
- Degenerative Disc Disease8▲ 293×2 topics
- Low Back Pain8▲ 157×3 topics
- Spinal Fusion6▲ 227×2 topics
- Surgical Treatment6▲ 92×3 topics
- Clinical Outcomes5▲ 90×2 topics
- Intervertebral Disc5▲ 267×1 topic
- Lumbar Disc Degeneration5▲ 267×1 topic
- Epidemiology5▲ 4.0×10 topics
- Chronic Pain4▲ 54×3 topics
- Anterior Cervical Discectomy3▲ 359×1 topic
- Cervical Spine Surgery3▲ 359×1 topic
- Clinical Trials2▲ 14×2 topics
- Disability2▲ 86×1 topic
- Global Burden2▲ 15×1 topic
- Biomechanics2▲ 23×5 topics
- Risk Factors2▲ 6.1×5 topics
- Pain Management2▲ 23×4 topics
- Surgical Management2▲ 11×5 topics
- Rehabilitation1▲ 13×3 topics
- Shoulder Function1▲ 54×2 topics
- Complications1▲ 7.9×4 topics
- Rotator Cuff Tears1▲ 68×1 topic
- Shoulder Pathology1▲ 68×1 topic
- Perioperative Care1▲ 32×2 topics
- Postoperative Pain1▲ 36×2 topics
- Prevention1▲ 9.5×3 topics
Which research topics does New Hampshire NeuroSpine Institute publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology, Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works
- 2 Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy Surgery 0 works
- 3 Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques Surgery 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has New Hampshire NeuroSpine Institute's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 57% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Bedford
- General Kinetics (United States)
- Ferrotec (United States)
- Southeastern Regional Education Service Center
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.