Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

1. Environmental Science#2,704 #2,103
2. Life Sciences#8,989 #4,843
3. Physical Sciences#12,211 #8,328

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Ecology takes 20.2× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

1. EcologySubfield · 24.5 works20×

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

• Environmental Science 8.2×
• Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7.5×
• Veterinary 2.0×
• Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.8×
• Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.6×
• Energy 0.5×
• Arts and Humanities 0.5×
• Health Professions 0.4×
• Social Sciences 0.3×
• Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.3×
• Engineering 0.2×
• Nursing 0.1×
• Chemistry 0.1×
• Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
• Materials Science 0.1×
• Computer Science 0.1×
• Decision Sciences 0.1×
• Psychology 0.1×
• Medicine 0.0×

Ranked on the composite score, Stefan Fleck, Peter Meyer and Henning Meesenburg lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt.

1. 1 🇩🇪 Stefan Fleck Germany · #298,665 worldwide 295 citations · 16 works
2. 2 🇩🇪 Peter Meyer Germany · #1,064,723 worldwide 52 citations · 54 works
3. 3 🇩🇪 Henning Meesenburg Germany · #1,473,140 worldwide 38 citations · 24 works

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Biodiversity, Biodiversity Conservation, Invasive Species, Global Warming, Ecosystem Functioning, Biological Invasions and Conservation.

By volume in 2022–2025: Forest Insect Ecology and Management, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, Entomological Studies and Ecology and Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems.

1. 1 Forest Insect Ecology and Management Ecology 10 works
2. 2 Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies Insect Science 8 works
3. 3 Entomological Studies and Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 8 works
4. 4 Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems Forestry 7 works
5. 5 Forest Management and Policy Global and Planetary Change 7 works
6. 6 Botany and Plant Ecology Studies Plant Science 6 works
7. 7 International Human Rights and Reproductive Law Political Science and International Relations 5 works
8. 8 Forest ecology and management Nature and Landscape Conservation 5 works
9. 9 Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology Ecology 5 works
10. 10 Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics Soil Science 5 works

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

Output in 2018–2022 was 63% higher than in 2013–2017.

• University of Göttingen
• Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
• Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
• Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research
• Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine
• German Primate Center
• Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization
• Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science