Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
In research, Nuclear Decommissioning Authority stands highest in Physical Sciences (#16,034 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #29,163 of 42,892
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #1,555 of 2,253
- Research works
- 164 ▼ 9% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 1.3k 7.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 42% world 28%
What is Nuclear Decommissioning Authority known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #16,034 of 21,541 | 10.5% | 127 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Nuclear Decommissioning Authority sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 4.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Environmental Science 4.0×
- Materials Science 3.6×
- Engineering 3.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 2.2×
- Decision Sciences 1.6×
- Energy 1.2×
- Chemistry 0.7×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Neuroscience 0.6×
- Health Professions 0.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.3×
- Psychology 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Nuclear Decommissioning Authority?
Ranked on the composite score, Richard Woodcock, Cristiano Padovani and Masahiko Nakase lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.
- 1 Richard Woodcock United Kingdom · #671,337 worldwide 11 citations · 18 works
- 2 Cristiano Padovani United Kingdom · #1,200,954 worldwide 75 citations · 15 works
- 3 Masahiko Nakase United Kingdom · #1,377,825 worldwide 0 citations · 236 works
Which keywords describe research at Nuclear Decommissioning Authority?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Environmental Impact, Sustainability, Marine Pollution, Economic Analysis, Offshore Decommissioning, Ship Recycling, Renewable Energy and Bioaccumulation.
- Natural Gas
- Numerical Simulation
- Conservation
- Pitting Corrosion
- Nuclear Fuel
- Nuclear Graphite
- Toxicology
- Environmental
- Subsea
- Finite Element Analysis
- Health Effects
- Bioaccumulation
- Ship Recycling
- Economic Analysis
- Sustainability
- Environmental Impact
- Marine Pollution
- Offshore Decommissioning
- Renewable Energy
- Climate Change
- Emissions
- Oil and Gas
- Technology
- Mercury
- Corrosion
- Oxidation Behavior
- Radiation Protection
- Control Strategies
- Mechanical Properties
- Water Quality
- Population Dynamics
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 31 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 31 words, with their numbers
- Environmental Impact9▲ 12×14 topics
- Sustainability8▲ 7.2×7 topics
- Marine Pollution7▲ 869×2 topics
- Economic Analysis7▲ 102×2 topics
- Offshore Decommissioning7▲ 1673×1 topic
- Ship Recycling7▲ 1673×1 topic
- Renewable Energy4▲ 6.7×8 topics
- Bioaccumulation3▲ 69×3 topics
- Climate Change3▲ 2.2×11 topics
- Health Effects3▲ 9.9×5 topics
- Emissions2▲ 25×3 topics
- Finite Element Analysis2▲ 22×2 topics
- Oil and Gas2▲ 131×2 topics
- Subsea2▲ 508×1 topic
- Technology2▲ 8.9×1 topic
- Environmental2▲ 77×1 topic
- Mercury2▲ 151×1 topic
- Toxicology2▲ 25×2 topics
- Corrosion2▲ 30×4 topics
- Nuclear Graphite2▲ 178×1 topic
- Oxidation Behavior2▲ 63×1 topic
- Nuclear Fuel1▲ 185×1 topic
- Radiation Protection1▲ 185×1 topic
- Pitting Corrosion1▲ 61×2 topics
- Control Strategies1▲ 20×2 topics
- Conservation1▲ 5.9×4 topics
- Mechanical Properties1▲ 2.7×6 topics
- Numerical Simulation1▲ 8.2×4 topics
- Water Quality1▲ 6.2×5 topics
- Natural Gas1▲ 24×2 topics
- Population Dynamics1▲ 9.5×3 topics
Which research topics does Nuclear Decommissioning Authority publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies, Offshore Engineering and Technologies, Mercury impact and mitigation studies and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies Ocean Engineering 7 works
- 2 Offshore Engineering and Technologies Ocean Engineering 2 works
- 3 Mercury impact and mitigation studies Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2 works
- 4 Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies Materials Chemistry 2 works
- 5 Nuclear and radioactivity studies Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 1 works
- 6 Wave and Wind Energy Systems Ocean Engineering 1 works
- 7 Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition Materials Chemistry 1 works
- 8 Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis Mechanical Engineering 1 works
- 9 Diverse Research and Applications Information Systems 1 works
- 10 Marine animal studies overview Ecology 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Nuclear Decommissioning Authority's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 9% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.