Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Government institution · Petrified Forest National Park · ??

Petrified Forest National Park

Research works
28
▲ 129% vs 2013–17
Citations
713
25.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
46.9%
record average 16.5%
Open access
45%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Petrified Forest National Park is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at Petrified Forest National Park?

Ranked on the composite score, William G. Parker lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Petrified Forest National Park.

  1. 1 William G. Parker ?? · #438,701 worldwide 104 citations · 20 works
All ranked researchers at Petrified Forest National Park

Which keywords describe research at Petrified Forest National Park?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Phylogenetic Analysis, Evolution, Morphology, Dinosaur, Paleontology, Molecular Phylogeny, Biogeography and Mammal Evolution.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 26 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 26 words, with their numbers
  1. Phylogenetic Analysis8▲ 77×2 topics
  2. Dinosaur7▲ 1666×1 topic
  3. Evolution7▲ 86×2 topics
  4. Morphology7▲ 130×2 topics
  5. Paleontology7▲ 1666×1 topic
  6. Molecular Phylogeny6▲ 113×3 topics
  7. Biogeography6▲ 63×2 topics
  8. Mammal Evolution6▲ 721×1 topic
  9. Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis6▲ 721×1 topic
  10. Population Dynamics6▲ 66×3 topics
  11. Conservation5▲ 39×5 topics
  12. Fisheries5▲ 410×2 topics
  13. Rays4▲ 701×1 topic
  14. Sharks4▲ 701×1 topic
  15. Climate Change3▲ 4.6×7 topics
  16. Paleoproductivity2▲ 173×1 topic
  17. Paleoredox2▲ 173×1 topic
  18. Tectonics2▲ 40×3 topics
  19. Glacial Cycles1▲ 47×1 topic
  20. Paleoclimatology1▲ 41×1 topic
  21. Amphibian Declines1▲ 139×1 topic
  22. Chytridiomycosis1▲ 139×1 topic
  23. Conservation Biology1▲ 40×2 topics
  24. Habitat Fragmentation1▲ 15×2 topics
  25. Arctic1▲ 34×1 topic
  26. geology1▲ 132×1 topic

Which research topics does Petrified Forest National Park publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution and Paleontology Studies, Ichthyology and Marine Biology and Amphibian and Reptile Biology.

  1. 1 Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology Paleontology 1 works
  2. 2 Evolution and Paleontology Studies Paleontology 1 works
  3. 3 Ichthyology and Marine Biology Nature and Landscape Conservation 1 works
  4. 4 Amphibian and Reptile Biology Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  5. 5 Optical measurement and interference techniques Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
  6. 6 Rangeland and Wildlife Management Ecology 0 works
  7. 7 Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils Paleontology 0 works
  8. 8 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 0 works
  9. 9 Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 0 works
  10. 10 Coronary Artery Anomalies Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available45.3%not open54.7%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors16.1%domestic only83.9%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Petrified Forest National Park's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 129% higher than in 2013–2017.

201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.