Petrified Forest National Park
- Research works
- 28 ▲ 129% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 713 25.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 46.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 45% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Petrified Forest National Park is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Who are the top researchers at Petrified Forest National Park?
Ranked on the composite score, William G. Parker lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Petrified Forest National Park.
- 1 William G. Parker ?? · #438,701 worldwide 104 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Petrified Forest National Park?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Phylogenetic Analysis, Evolution, Morphology, Dinosaur, Paleontology, Molecular Phylogeny, Biogeography and Mammal Evolution.
- geology
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Chytridiomycosis
- Paleoclimatology
- Tectonics
- Paleoproductivity
- Sharks
- Fisheries
- Population Dynamics
- Mammal Evolution
- Molecular Phylogeny
- Morphology
- Dinosaur
- Phylogenetic Analysis
- Evolution
- Paleontology
- Biogeography
- Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis
- Conservation
- Rays
- Climate Change
- Paleoredox
- Glacial Cycles
- Amphibian Declines
- Conservation Biology
- Arctic
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 26 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 26 words, with their numbers
- Phylogenetic Analysis8▲ 77×2 topics
- Dinosaur7▲ 1666×1 topic
- Evolution7▲ 86×2 topics
- Morphology7▲ 130×2 topics
- Paleontology7▲ 1666×1 topic
- Molecular Phylogeny6▲ 113×3 topics
- Biogeography6▲ 63×2 topics
- Mammal Evolution6▲ 721×1 topic
- Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis6▲ 721×1 topic
- Population Dynamics6▲ 66×3 topics
- Conservation5▲ 39×5 topics
- Fisheries5▲ 410×2 topics
- Rays4▲ 701×1 topic
- Sharks4▲ 701×1 topic
- Climate Change3▲ 4.6×7 topics
- Paleoproductivity2▲ 173×1 topic
- Paleoredox2▲ 173×1 topic
- Tectonics2▲ 40×3 topics
- Glacial Cycles1▲ 47×1 topic
- Paleoclimatology1▲ 41×1 topic
- Amphibian Declines1▲ 139×1 topic
- Chytridiomycosis1▲ 139×1 topic
- Conservation Biology1▲ 40×2 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation1▲ 15×2 topics
- Arctic1▲ 34×1 topic
- geology1▲ 132×1 topic
Which research topics does Petrified Forest National Park publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution and Paleontology Studies, Ichthyology and Marine Biology and Amphibian and Reptile Biology.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology Paleontology 1 works
- 2 Evolution and Paleontology Studies Paleontology 1 works
- 3 Ichthyology and Marine Biology Nature and Landscape Conservation 1 works
- 4 Amphibian and Reptile Biology Global and Planetary Change 0 works
- 5 Optical measurement and interference techniques Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
- 6 Rangeland and Wildlife Management Ecology 0 works
- 7 Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils Paleontology 0 works
- 8 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 0 works
- 9 Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 0 works
- 10 Coronary Artery Anomalies Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Petrified Forest National Park's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 129% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.