- Research works
- 25 ▲ 339% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 235 9.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 2.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 54% world 28%
Not ranked overall: South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 10.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
Which keywords describe research at South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Invasive Species, Fisheries Sustainability, Habitat Fragmentation, Freshwater Biodiversity, Conservation Challenges, Flow Regulation and Habitat Selection.
- Ecosystem Engineering
- Spermatogenesis
- Oogenesis
- Fish
- Avian Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Genetic Diversity
- Fish Feed
- Animal Movement
- Population Dynamics
- Biodiversity
- Habitat Selection
- Conservation Challenges
- Freshwater Biodiversity
- Invasive Species
- Climate Change
- Fisheries Sustainability
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Flow Regulation
- Aquaculture
- Trophic Cascades
- Conservation
- Occupancy Rates
- Nutrition
- Biogeography
- Gonadal Development
- Migration Patterns
- Length-Weight Relationships
- Sagebrush
- Wildlife Habitat
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 30 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 30 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change9▲ 13×13 topics
- Invasive Species7▲ 46×6 topics
- Fisheries Sustainability5▲ 154×2 topics
- Freshwater Biodiversity4▲ 203×2 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation4▲ 60×2 topics
- Conservation Challenges4▲ 243×1 topic
- Flow Regulation4▲ 243×1 topic
- Habitat Selection4▲ 151×2 topics
- Aquaculture3▲ 48×3 topics
- Biodiversity3▲ 16×5 topics
- Trophic Cascades3▲ 102×2 topics
- Population Dynamics3▲ 37×4 topics
- Conservation3▲ 22×5 topics
- Animal Movement2▲ 158×1 topic
- Occupancy Rates2▲ 158×1 topic
- Fish Feed2▲ 152×1 topic
- Nutrition2▲ 21×1 topic
- Genetic Diversity2▲ 13×5 topics
- Biogeography1▲ 16×2 topics
- Ecosystem1▲ 35×2 topics
- Gonadal Development1▲ 110×2 topics
- Avian Ecology1▲ 140×1 topic
- Migration Patterns1▲ 123×1 topic
- Fish1▲ 102×1 topic
- Length-Weight Relationships1▲ 102×1 topic
- Oogenesis1▲ 206×1 topic
- Sagebrush1▲ 212×1 topic
- Spermatogenesis1▲ 206×1 topic
- Wildlife Habitat1▲ 212×1 topic
- Ecosystem Engineering1▲ 110×2 topics
Which research topics does South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Fish Ecology and Management Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 2 works
- 2 Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth Aquatic Science 1 works
- 3 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 1 works
- 4 Aquaculture disease management and microbiota Immunology 1 works
- 5 Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species Physiology 0 works
- 6 Avian ecology and behavior Ecology 0 works
- 7 Fish Biology and Ecology Studies Aquatic Science 0 works
- 8 Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior Ecology 0 works
- 9 Rangeland and Wildlife Management Ecology 0 works
- 10 Hydrological Forecasting Using AI Environmental Engineering 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 339% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.