Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager
In research, Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager stands highest in Social Sciences (#15,605 of 16,945 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#9,493 of 10,206 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Sociology and Political Science — Sociology and Political Science is 8.1× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #26,089 of 28,054 · #36,496 all time
- Rank in France
- #1,271 of 1,422
- Research works
- 339 ▼ 15% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 1.6k 4.6 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 12% world 28%
What is Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #15,605 of 16,945 | 7.8% | 196 | |
| Social SciencesField | #9,493 of 10,206 | 7.8% | 150 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Sociology and Political Science takes 8.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield · 20.3 works8.1×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 3.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Environmental Science 3.7×
- Social Sciences 3.1×
- Arts and Humanities 2.0×
- Health Professions 1.9×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.9×
- Psychology 0.9×
- Engineering 0.7×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.0×
- Medicine 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager?
Ranked on the composite score, Raffaele Poli, Dany Lapostolle and François-Pierre Tourneux lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager.
- 1 Raffaele Poli France · #407,792 worldwide 20 citations · 25 works
- 2 Dany Lapostolle France · #462,362 worldwide 1 citations · 32 works
- 3 François-Pierre Tourneux France · #489,917 worldwide 12 citations · 35 works
- 4 Pierre Frankhauser France · #530,472 worldwide 96 citations · 75 works
- 5 Thomas Bühler France · #644,169 worldwide 3 citations · 17 works
- 6 Franck Dubois France · #664,643 worldwide 2 citations · 23 works
- 7 André Larceneux France · #763,134 worldwide 0 citations · 16 works
- 8 Alexandre Moine France · #770,418 worldwide 6 citations · 52 works
- 9 Anne Cadoret France · #807,485 worldwide 21 citations · 48 works
- 10 Loïc Ravenel France · #834,659 worldwide 2 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Community Engagement, Public Policy, Local Development, Territorial Governance, Social Justice, Sustainable Development, Citizen Participation and Environmental Participation.
- Inequality
- Built Environment
- Poverty Alleviation
- Environmental Justice
- Elderly
- Retirement
- Social Determinants of Health
- Physical Activity
- Adaptation
- Space Syntax
- Biodiversity
- Spatial Dynamics
- Global Impact
- Land Use Change
- Ecosystem Services
- Sustainability
- Environmental Participation
- Territorial Governance
- Social Justice
- Public Policy
- Community Engagement
- Local Development
- Sustainable Development
- Citizen Participation
- Climate Change
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Urbanization
- Social-Ecological Systems
- Remote Sensing
- Smallholder Farmers
- Spatial Analysis
- Street Networks
- Livestock Farming
- Community Development
- Transportation
- Aging
- Social Innovation
- Healthcare Access
- Active Travel
- Family Support Policies
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Community Engagement16▲ 72×5 topics
- Public Policy16▲ 48×3 topics
- Local Development16▲ 203×2 topics
- Social Justice16▲ 40×5 topics
- Sustainable Development16▲ 15×5 topics
- Territorial Governance16▲ 186×2 topics
- Citizen Participation15▲ 171×1 topic
- Environmental Participation15▲ 265×1 topic
- Climate Change9▲ 4.7×26 topics
- Sustainability9▲ 5.2×9 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation8▲ 30×6 topics
- Ecosystem Services6▲ 22×6 topics
- Urbanization6▲ 21×6 topics
- Land Use Change5▲ 23×4 topics
- Social-Ecological Systems5▲ 49×3 topics
- Global Impact4▲ 36×1 topic
- Remote Sensing4▲ 4.9×15 topics
- Spatial Dynamics4▲ 65×1 topic
- Smallholder Farmers3▲ 22×2 topics
- Biodiversity3▲ 5.7×10 topics
- Spatial Analysis3▲ 47×2 topics
- Space Syntax3▲ 223×1 topic
- Street Networks3▲ 223×1 topic
- Adaptation3▲ 14×1 topic
- Livestock Farming3▲ 65×1 topic
- Physical Activity3▲ 7.8×4 topics
- Community Development2▲ 19×3 topics
- Social Determinants of Health2▲ 15×3 topics
- Transportation2▲ 18×2 topics
- Retirement2▲ 44×2 topics
- Aging2▲ 5.4×1 topic
- Elderly2▲ 12×1 topic
- Social Innovation2▲ 19×3 topics
- Environmental Justice2▲ 19×2 topics
- Healthcare Access2▲ 9.0×2 topics
- Poverty Alleviation2▲ 26×2 topics
- Active Travel2▲ 35×1 topic
- Built Environment2▲ 35×1 topic
- Family Support Policies2▲ 153×1 topic
- Inequality2▲ 11×1 topic
Which research topics does Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: French Urban and Social Studies, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Urban Design and Spatial Analysis and Agriculture and Rural Development Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 15 works
- 2 Land Use and Ecosystem Services Global and Planetary Change 4 works
- 3 Urban Design and Spatial Analysis Building and Construction 3 works
- 4 Agriculture and Rural Development Research Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3 works
- 5 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 2 works
- 6 Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation 2 works
- 7 Social Policies and Family Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 8 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 2 works
- 9 Forest Management and Policy Global and Planetary Change 1 works
- 10 Outdoor and Experiential Education Social Psychology 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 15% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Besançon
- Université de Franche-Comté
- Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon
- Franche-Comté Électronique Mécanique Thermique et Optique - Sciences et Technologies
- Laboratoire Chrono-Environnement
- École Nationale Supérieure de Mécanique et des Microtechniques
- Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers Terre Homme Environnement Temps Astronomie
- CNR de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.