Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Besançon · France

Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager

In research, Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager stands highest in Social Sciences (#15,605 of 16,945 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#9,493 of 10,206 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Sociology and Political Science — Sociology and Political Science is 8.1× its share of world research.

World rank, 2022–2025
#26,089
of 28,054 · #36,496 all time
Rank in France
#1,271
of 1,422
Research works
339
▼ 15% vs 2013–17
Citations
1.6k
4.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.2%
record average 16.5%
Open access
12%
world 28%

What is Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #15,605 of 16,945 7.8%196
Social SciencesField #9,493 of 10,206 7.8%150

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

What does Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Sociology and Political Science takes 8.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield · 20.3 works8.1×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.58× its world share, 5 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Chemistry: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.46× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.84× its world share, 2 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.67× its world share, 7 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 3.73× its world share, 13 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 1.95× its world share, 4 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.02× its world share, 4 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.92× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.87× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.14× its world share, 28 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 3.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager?

Ranked on the composite score, Raffaele Poli, Dany Lapostolle and François-Pierre Tourneux lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager.

  1. 1 Raffaele Poli France · #407,792 worldwide 20 citations · 25 works
  2. 2 Dany Lapostolle France · #462,362 worldwide 1 citations · 32 works
  3. 3 François-Pierre Tourneux France · #489,917 worldwide 12 citations · 35 works
  4. 4 Pierre Frankhauser France · #530,472 worldwide 96 citations · 75 works
  5. 5 Thomas Bühler France · #644,169 worldwide 3 citations · 17 works
  6. 6 Franck Dubois France · #664,643 worldwide 2 citations · 23 works
  7. 7 André Larceneux France · #763,134 worldwide 0 citations · 16 works
  8. 8 Alexandre Moine France · #770,418 worldwide 6 citations · 52 works
  9. 9 Anne Cadoret France · #807,485 worldwide 21 citations · 48 works
  10. 10 Loïc Ravenel France · #834,659 worldwide 2 citations · 20 works
All ranked researchers at Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager

Which keywords describe research at Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Community Engagement, Public Policy, Local Development, Territorial Governance, Social Justice, Sustainable Development, Citizen Participation and Environmental Participation.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Community Engagement16▲ 72×5 topics
  2. Public Policy16▲ 48×3 topics
  3. Local Development16▲ 203×2 topics
  4. Social Justice16▲ 40×5 topics
  5. Sustainable Development16▲ 15×5 topics
  6. Territorial Governance16▲ 186×2 topics
  7. Citizen Participation15▲ 171×1 topic
  8. Environmental Participation15▲ 265×1 topic
  9. Climate Change9▲ 4.7×26 topics
  10. Sustainability9▲ 5.2×9 topics
  11. Biodiversity Conservation8▲ 30×6 topics
  12. Ecosystem Services6▲ 22×6 topics
  13. Urbanization6▲ 21×6 topics
  14. Land Use Change5▲ 23×4 topics
  15. Social-Ecological Systems5▲ 49×3 topics
  16. Global Impact4▲ 36×1 topic
  17. Remote Sensing4▲ 4.9×15 topics
  18. Spatial Dynamics4▲ 65×1 topic
  19. Smallholder Farmers3▲ 22×2 topics
  20. Biodiversity3▲ 5.7×10 topics
  21. Spatial Analysis3▲ 47×2 topics
  22. Space Syntax3▲ 223×1 topic
  23. Street Networks3▲ 223×1 topic
  24. Adaptation3▲ 14×1 topic
  25. Livestock Farming3▲ 65×1 topic
  26. Physical Activity3▲ 7.8×4 topics
  27. Community Development2▲ 19×3 topics
  28. Social Determinants of Health2▲ 15×3 topics
  29. Transportation2▲ 18×2 topics
  30. Retirement2▲ 44×2 topics
  31. Aging2▲ 5.4×1 topic
  32. Elderly2▲ 12×1 topic
  33. Social Innovation2▲ 19×3 topics
  34. Environmental Justice2▲ 19×2 topics
  35. Healthcare Access2▲ 9.0×2 topics
  36. Poverty Alleviation2▲ 26×2 topics
  37. Active Travel2▲ 35×1 topic
  38. Built Environment2▲ 35×1 topic
  39. Family Support Policies2▲ 153×1 topic
  40. Inequality2▲ 11×1 topic

Which research topics does Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: French Urban and Social Studies, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Urban Design and Spatial Analysis and Agriculture and Rural Development Research.

  1. 1 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 15 works
  2. 2 Land Use and Ecosystem Services Global and Planetary Change 4 works
  3. 3 Urban Design and Spatial Analysis Building and Construction 3 works
  4. 4 Agriculture and Rural Development Research Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3 works
  5. 5 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 2 works
  6. 6 Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation 2 works
  7. 7 Social Policies and Family Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  8. 8 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 2 works
  9. 9 Forest Management and Policy Global and Planetary Change 1 works
  10. 10 Outdoor and Experiential Education Social Psychology 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available12.2%not open87.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors5.1%domestic only94.9%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Théoriser et Modéliser pour Aménager's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 15% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Besançon

All research institutions in Besançon

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.