Most cited papers from Brookhaven Science Associates
What are the most cited papers from Brookhaven Science Associates?
The most cited paper from Brookhaven Science Associates is "TOP QUARK PHYSICS AT THE TEVATRON" (P. C. Bhat, Harrison Bertrand Prosper, SCOTT S. SNYDER, 1998), with 42 citations. Next come "Design of a perfluorocarbon tracer based monitoring network to support monitoring verification and accounting of sequestered CO2" (3) and "RHIC insertion region, shunt power supply current errors" (1).
Showing 6 of 6 papers. Every paper is listed.
| # | Paper | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TOP QUARK PHYSICS AT THE TEVATRON P. C. Bhat, Harrison Bertrand Prosper, SCOTT S. SNYDER · International Journal of Modern Physics A | 10 Dec 1998 | 42 |
| 2 | Design of a perfluorocarbon tracer based monitoring network to support monitoring verification and accounting of sequestered CO2 Thomas B. Watson, Terrence Sullivan · EPJ Web of Conferences | 2013 | 3 |
| 3 | RHIC insertion region, shunt power supply current errors D. Bruno, George Ganetis, R. Lambiase et al. · PACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268) | 14 Nov 2002 | 1 |
| 4 | RHIC power supplies-failure statistics for runs 4, 5 and 6 D. Bruno, George Ganetis, G. Heppner et al. | 2007 | 0 |
| 5 | Overview of the ags cold snake power supplies and the new RHIC sextupole power supplies D. Bruno, George Ganetis, W. Louie et al. | 2007 | 0 |
| 6 | RHIC power supplies: lessons learned from the 1999 - 2001 RHIC runs D. Bruno, W. Eng, George Ganetis et al. | 8 Jul 2004 | 0 |
Citations are OpenAlex's own counts, from its 2026-09-23 snapshot, so the ranking can differ from Google Scholar or Web of Science. A paper is listed for an institution when any of its authors gave it as an affiliation; retracted papers and papers whose citation count cannot be traced to citing works are left out, and a preprint and the article it became are shown once. Release dates are OpenAlex's: where a source gave only a month or a year, that is what is shown. How the lists are chosen.