Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée
In research, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,370 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics — Economics, Econometrics and Finance is 12.3× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #19,130 of 28,054 · #20,209 all time
- Rank in France
- #878 of 1,422
- Research works
- 794 ▼ 5% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 12k 14.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 20.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 35% world 28%
What is Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,370 of 10,521 | 22.4% | 85 | #3826 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Economics, Econometrics and Finance takes 12.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Economics, Econometrics and FinanceField · 30.9 works12×
- Economics and EconometricsSubfield · 22.6 works12×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 12.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 4.2×
- Decision Sciences 4.0×
- Energy 2.9×
- Social Sciences 2.0×
- Environmental Science 1.7×
- Mathematics 1.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.9×
- Health Professions 0.7×
- Arts and Humanities 0.6×
- Psychology 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée?
Ranked on the composite score, Marcus Wagner, Éric Schenk and Claude Guittard lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée.
- 1 Marcus Wagner France · #15,624 worldwide 828 citations · 69 works
- 2 Éric Schenk France · #187,618 worldwide 149 citations · 20 works
- 3 Claude Guittard France · #247,222 worldwide 148 citations · 17 works
- 4 Agnès Gramain France · #311,275 worldwide 14 citations · 26 works
- 5 Serge Garcia France · #440,999 worldwide 91 citations · 44 works
- 6 Paul Müller France · #605,395 worldwide 58 citations · 31 works
- 7 Ragıp Ege France · #651,807 worldwide 9 citations · 20 works
- 8 Ehud Zuscovitch France · #652,063 worldwide 48 citations · 19 works
- 9 Jens Abildtrup France · #679,368 worldwide 53 citations · 38 works
- 10 Michel Dévoluy France · #701,811 worldwide 2 citations · 23 works
Which keywords describe research at Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Economic Growth, Monetary Policy, Community Engagement, Territorial Governance, Local Development, Economic Development, Innovation and Strategic Alliances.
- Market Orientation
- Value Creation
- Energy Transition
- Solidarity Economy
- Urbanization
- Collaboration
- Environmental Participation
- Inequality
- Neoliberalism
- Panel Data Analysis
- Competition
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Property Rights
- Social Capital
- Strategic Alliances
- Globalization
- Territorial Governance
- Economic Development
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Economic Growth
- Monetary Policy
- Innovation
- Community Engagement
- Local Development
- Sustainable Development
- Public Policy
- Renewable Energy
- Regulation
- Social Justice
- Financial Development
- Fiscal Policy
- Structural Change
- Citizen Participation
- Knowledge Sharing
- Institutionalization
- Social Innovation
- Human Capital
- Organizational Learning
- Liquidity
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Economic Growth12▲ 12×17 topics
- Sustainability8▲ 2.7×31 topics
- Monetary Policy7▲ 25×7 topics
- Climate Change7▲ 2.1×23 topics
- Innovation6▲ 5.3×22 topics
- Economic Development6▲ 6.5×13 topics
- Community Engagement6▲ 16×4 topics
- Territorial Governance6▲ 41×3 topics
- Local Development6▲ 45×2 topics
- Globalization6▲ 2.5×29 topics
- Sustainable Development6▲ 3.1×15 topics
- Strategic Alliances5▲ 64×3 topics
- Public Policy5▲ 8.5×7 topics
- Social Capital5▲ 7.9×11 topics
- Renewable Energy5▲ 2.8×12 topics
- Property Rights5▲ 58×6 topics
- Regulation4▲ 7.2×9 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation4▲ 9.9×8 topics
- Social Justice4▲ 6.3×5 topics
- Competition4▲ 64×3 topics
- Financial Development4▲ 23×2 topics
- Panel Data Analysis4▲ 23×2 topics
- Fiscal Policy4▲ 16×4 topics
- Neoliberalism4▲ 9.0×7 topics
- Structural Change4▲ 47×2 topics
- Inequality4▲ 13×7 topics
- Citizen Participation3▲ 22×1 topic
- Environmental Participation3▲ 34×1 topic
- Knowledge Sharing3▲ 17×5 topics
- Collaboration3▲ 52×3 topics
- Institutionalization3▲ 27×2 topics
- Urbanization3▲ 6.1×4 topics
- Social Innovation3▲ 16×1 topic
- Solidarity Economy3▲ 39×1 topic
- Human Capital3▲ 15×4 topics
- Energy Transition3▲ 16×3 topics
- Organizational Learning3▲ 35×3 topics
- Value Creation3▲ 61×2 topics
- Liquidity3▲ 29×3 topics
- Market Orientation3▲ 45×2 topics
Which research topics does Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: French Urban and Social Studies, Social Sciences and Governance, Innovation and Knowledge Management and Business Strategy and Innovation.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 3 works
- 2 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 3 works
- 3 Innovation and Knowledge Management Strategy and Management 2 works
- 4 Business Strategy and Innovation Strategy and Management 2 works
- 5 Monetary Policy and Economic Impact General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 works
- 6 Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 7 Education, sociology, and vocational training Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 8 Economic and Environmental Valuation Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 9 Market Dynamics and Volatility Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 10 Energy, Environment, Economic Growth Economics and Econometrics 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 5% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Strasbourg
- Université de Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
- Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg
- Institut de Physique et Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg
- Hôpital d'Hautepierre
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire
- Institut de Virologie
- Institut Charles Sadron
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.