Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact is a research topic within General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Science Explorer counts 61k research works in it since 1950. 28.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics in macroeconomic analysis, including monetary and fiscal policy, economic growth, financial development, business cycles, panel data analysis, interest rates, exchange rates, inflation dynamics, and structural change. The papers provide insights into the empirical and theoretical aspects of these macroeconomic phenomena and their implications for policy making.
- Monetary Policy
- Fiscal Policy
- Economic Growth
- Financial Development
- Business Cycles
- Panel Data Analysis
- Interest Rates
- Exchange Rates
- Inflation Dynamics
- Structural Change
- Research works
- 61k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 17k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 28.4% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- 0% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Monetary Policy and Economic Impact research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.5k and 740 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 1.5k works
- 2 China 740 works
- 3 Türkiye 628 works
- 4 India 487 works
- 5 United Kingdom 441 works
- 6 Germany 320 works
- 7 Nigeria 265 works
- 8 Italy 256 works
- 9 Indonesia 214 works
- 10 France 209 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Monetary Policy and Economic Impact research?
By volume in 2022–2025, European Central Bank publishes the most Monetary Policy and Economic Impact research, followed by International Monetary Fund and Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 European Central Bank Germany 56 works
- 2 International Monetary Fund United States 52 works
- 3 Federal Reserve Board of Governors United States 52 works
- 4 Federal Reserve United States 43 works
- 5 Bank of Italy Italy 39 works
- 6 National Bureau of Economic Research United States 37 works
- 7 Centre for Economic Policy Research United Kingdom 30 works
- 8 Bank of Spain Spain 28 works
- 9 University of Chicago United States 27 works
- 10 Columbia University United States 24 works
Who are the leading researchers in Monetary Policy and Economic Impact?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Monetary Policy and Economic Impact include Eugene F. Fama, Andrei Shleifer and M. Hashem Pesaran.
- 1 Eugene F. Fama 12k citations
- 2 Andrei Shleifer 10k citations
- 3 M. Hashem Pesaran 9.1k citations
- 4 Robert F. Engle 8.7k citations
- 5 Robert J. Barro 7.9k citations
- 6 Tim Bollerslev 7.8k citations
- 7 Joseph E. Stiglitz 7.4k citations
- 8 Yongcheol Shin 6.8k citations
- 9 Daron Acemoğlu 5.7k citations
- 10 Richard Blundell 5.2k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Monetary Policy and Economic Impact research done?
The largest centres of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact research in 2022–2025 are Washington D.C. (United States), Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom) and Istanbul (Türkiye). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Frankfurt am Main.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 Washington D.C. United States 223 works
- 2 Beijing China 180 works
- 3 London United Kingdom 175 works
- 4 Istanbul Türkiye 112 works
- 5 New York United States 96 works
- 6 Frankfurt am Main Germany 91 works
- 7 Moscow Russia 87 works
- 8 Rome Italy 87 works
- 9 Paris France 83 works
- 10 Ankara Türkiye 79 works
Where it is the local speciality
- Frankfurt am MainDE · 91.3 works13×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Monetary Policy and Economic Impact than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Monetary Policy and Economic Impact?
Among universities, judged by research, Lebanese American University, University of Sousse and Central University of Finance and Economics score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lebanese American University Lebanon | 63.5 | 70.9% | 9.9× | 9 | -0.0% |
| 2 | University of Sousse Tunisia | 61.1 | 45.9% | 11.4× | 11 | +148.2% |
| 3 | Central University of Finance and Economics China | 60.4 | 40.1% | 21.4× | 20 | +107.8% |
| 4 | University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam | 59.4 | 50.1% | 14.2× | 9 | +147.7% |
| 5 | Southwestern University of Finance and Economics China | 58.8 | 35.0% | 13.1× | 15 | +151.3% |
| 6 | University of Cape Coast Ghana | 56.1 | 60.2% | 9.3× | 10 | +37.4% |
| 7 | Capital University of Economics and Business China | 52.9 | 30.9% | 21.5× | 13 | +121.6% |
| 8 | Anadolu University Türkiye | 49.5 | 12.4% | 11.8× | 12 | +644.1% |
| 9 | University of Business and Technology Saudi Arabia | 49.5 | 40.4% | 11.6× | 9 | -35.1% |
| 10 | Obafemi Awolowo University Nigeria | 49.4 | 39.3% | 9.2× | 10 | +74.9% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Monetary Policy and Economic Impact research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 0% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Monetary Policy and Economic Impact.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.