Institution · Center for Open Science
Most cited papers from Center for Open Science
Center for Open Science
What are the most cited papers from Center for Open Science?
The most cited paper from Center for Open Science is "A manifesto for reproducible science" (Marcus Robert Munafo, Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy Bishop et al., 2017), with 3,631 citations. Next come "Redefine statistical significance" (2,853) and "The preregistration revolution" (2,019).
Showing 50 of 56 papers. Every paper with more than 101 citations is listed.
| # | Paper | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A manifesto for reproducible science Marcus Robert Munafo, Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy Bishop et al. · Nature Human Behaviour | 10 Jan 2017 | 3,631 |
| 2 | Redefine statistical significance Daniel Jacob Benjamin et al. · Nature Human Behaviour | 31 Aug 2017 | 2,853 |
| 3 | The preregistration revolution Brian A. Nosek, Charles R. Ebersole, Alexander Carl DeHaven et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | 12 Mar 2018 | 2,019 |
| 4 | Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 Colin F. Camerer et al. · Nature Human Behaviour | 17 Aug 2018 | 1,620 |
| 5 | Investigating Variation in Replicability Richard Anthony Klein et al. · Social Psychology | May 2014 | 1,279 |
| 6 | Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings Richard Anthony Klein et al. · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science | Dec 2018 | 1,045 |
| 7 | Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM Thom Vreven, K. Suzie Byun, István S. Komáromi et al. · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation | 14 Apr 2006 | 972 |
| 8 | Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results Raphael Silberzahn et al. · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science | 23 Aug 2018 | 874 |
| 9 | How open science helps researchers succeed Erin C. McKiernan, Philip E. Bourne, C. Titus Brown et al. · eLife | 7 Jul 2016 | 842 |
| 10 | Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science Brian A. Nosek, Tom Elis Hardwicke, Hannah Moshontz et al. · Annual Review of Psychology | 19 Oct 2021 | 771 |
| 11 | Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency Mallory C. Kidwell, Ljiljana B. Lazarević, Erica N. Baranski et al. · PLoS Biology | 12 May 2016 | 766 |
| 12 | Registered Reports Brian A. Nosek, Daniël Lakens · Social Psychology | May 2014 | 745 |
| 13 | The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Mark John Brandt, Hans IJzerman, Ap Dijksterhuis et al. · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | 23 Oct 2013 | 731 |
| 14 | Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Calvin K. Lai et al. · Journal of Experimental Psychology General | 16 Jun 2016 | 591 |
| 15 | Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research Edward A. Miguel, Colin F. Camerer, Katherine Casey et al. · Science | 2 Jan 2014 | 573 |
| 16 | Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention John P. A. Ioannidis, Marcus Robert Munafo, Paolo Fusar‐Poli et al. · Trends in Cognitive Sciences | 21 Mar 2014 | 511 |
| 17 | Justify your alpha Daniël Lakens et al. · Nature Human Behaviour | 26 Feb 2018 | 503 |
| 18 | What is replication? Brian A. Nosek, Timothy M. Errington · PLoS Biology | 27 Mar 2020 | 408 |
| 19 | Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology Timothy M. Errington, Maya B. Mathur, Courtney K. Soderberg et al. · eLife | 16 Nov 2021 | 389 |
| 20 | Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile Brian A. Nosek, Emorie D Beck, Lorne Campbell et al. · Trends in Cognitive Sciences | 14 Aug 2019 | 361 |
| 21 | Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research Anna Dreber, Thomas Pfeiffer, Johan Almenberg et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | 9 Nov 2015 | 348 |
| 22 | Reducing Implicit Gender Leadership Bias in Academic Medicine With an Educational Intervention Sabine C. Girod, Magali A. Fassiotto, Daisy Grewal et al. · Academic Medicine | 28 Jan 2016 | 328 |
| 23 | An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research Timothy M. Errington, Elizabeth J. Iorns, William G. Gunn et al. · eLife | 9 Dec 2014 | 328 |
| 24 | The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses. Courtney K. Soderberg, Shannon Peterson Callahan, Annie O. Kochersberger et al. · Psychological Bulletin | 24 Nov 2014 | 302 |
| 25 | Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model Courtney K. Soderberg, Timothy M. Errington, Sarah R. Schiavone et al. · Nature Human Behaviour | 24 Jun 2021 | 283 |
| 26 | Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology Timothy M Errington, Alexandria Denis, Nicole Perfito et al. · eLife | 15 Nov 2021 | 277 |
| 27 | Making sense of replications Brian A. Nosek, Timothy M. Errington · eLife | 16 Jan 2017 | 254 |
| 28 | Make scientific data FAIR Shelley Stall, Lynn Yarmey, Joel Cutcher‐Gershenfeld et al. · Nature | 4 Jun 2019 | 253 |
| 29 | Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study Tamarinde Laura Haven, Timothy M. Errington, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch et al. · International Journal of Qualitative Methods | 2020 | 228 |
| 30 | Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size Roger Giner‐Sorolla, Amanda Kay Montoya, Alan S. Reifman et al. · Personality and Social Psychology Review | 12 Feb 2024 | 218 |
| 31 | Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” Christopher Anderson et al. · Science | 3 Mar 2016 | 202 |
| 32 | Leveraging the power of place in citizen science for effective conservation decision making Greg Newman, Mark W. Chandler, Malin Clyde et al. · Biological Conservation | 12 Aug 2016 | 190 |
| 33 | Understanding and Using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recommended Scoring Procedures Brian A. Nosek, Yoav Bar‐Anan, N. Sriram et al. · PLoS ONE | 8 Dec 2014 | 181 |
| 34 | On the gender–science stereotypes held by scientists: explicit accord with gender-ratios, implicit accord with scientific identity Frederick L. Smyth, Brian A. Nosek · Frontiers in Psychology | 27 Apr 2015 | 174 |
| 35 | The Rules of Implicit Evaluation by Race, Religion, and Age Jordan R. Axt, Charles R. Ebersole, Brian A. Nosek · Psychological Science | 30 Jul 2014 | 168 |
| 36 | A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms Sam Parsons et al. · Nature Human Behaviour | 21 Feb 2022 | 167 |
| 37 | Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science Eric Luis Uhlmann, Charles R. Ebersole, Christopher R. Chartier et al. · Perspectives on Psychological Science | Jul 2019 | 167 |
| 38 | Four simple recommendations to encourage best practices in research software Rafael C. Jiménez et al. · F1000Research | 13 Jun 2017 | 157 |
| 39 | New technology-based firms in the 1990s Paul D. Gardiner · Technovation | Feb 1996 | 155 |
| 40 | Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power Katherine Susan Button, John P. A. Ioannidis, Claire Mokrysz et al. · Nature reviews. Neuroscience | 3 Jul 2013 | 138 |
| 41 | Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations Marjan Bakker, Coosje Lisabet Sterre Veldkamp, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen et al. · PLoS Biology | 9 Dec 2020 | 133 |
| 42 | Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education Bryan G. Cook, John Wills Lloyd, David Thomas Mellor et al. · Exceptional Children | 21 Aug 2018 | 132 |
| 43 | The Global Flourishing Study: Study Profile and Initial Results on Flourishing Tyler J. VanderWeele et al. · Nature Mental Health | 30 Apr 2025 | 131 |
| 44 | Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement Richard Anthony Klein et al. | 11 Dec 2019 | 131 |
| 45 | Data from the Race Implicit Association Test on the Project Implicit Demo Website Kaiyuan Xu, Brian A. Nosek, Anthony G. Greenwald · Journal of Open Psychology Data | 18 Mar 2014 | 128 |
| 46 | Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research Sara Wylie, Kirk Jalbert, Shannon Dosemagen et al. · The Information Society | Mar 2014 | 128 |
| 47 | Reproducibility of real-world evidence studies using clinical practice data to inform regulatory and coverage decisions Shirley V. Wang et al. · Nature Communications | 31 Aug 2022 | 120 |
| 48 | Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project Richard Anthony Klein et al. | 7 Feb 2022 | 119 |
| 49 | Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices Aaron R. Caldwell, Andrew David Vigotsky, Matthew S. Tenan et al. · Sports Medicine | 4 Feb 2020 | 118 |
| 50 | Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability Brian A. Nosek, Jeffrey Robert Spies, Matt S. Motyl | 29 Aug 2016 | 115 |
Citations are OpenAlex's own counts, from its 2026-09-23 snapshot, so the ranking can differ from Google Scholar or Web of Science. A paper is listed for an institution when any of its authors gave it as an affiliation; retracted papers and papers whose citation count cannot be traced to citing works are left out, and a preprint and the article it became are shown once. Release dates are OpenAlex's: where a source gave only a month or a year, that is what is shown. How the lists are chosen.