Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Paris · ??

Centre de données socio-politiques de Sciences Po

cdsp.sciences-po.frROR OpenAlex
Research works
30
▲ 89% vs 2013–17
Citations
163
5.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.3%
record average 16.5%
Open access
47%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Centre de données socio-politiques de Sciences Po is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.96× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.30× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 2.20× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEnvironmental Science: 0.31× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 2.85× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 2.47× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.54× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.84× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 3.06× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.84× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.54× its world share, 6 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 3.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Centre de données socio-politiques de Sciences Po?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Data Sharing, Social Determinants of Health, Ethical Issues, Research Methodology, Public Health, Qualitative Data, Secondary Analysis and Healthcare Policy.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 30 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 30 words, with their numbers
  1. Data Sharing3▲ 545×2 topics
  2. Social Determinants of Health3▲ 39×3 topics
  3. Public Health2▲ 6.3×6 topics
  4. Ethical Issues2▲ 80×2 topics
  5. Research Methodology2▲ 135×2 topics
  6. Qualitative Data2▲ 1586×1 topic
  7. Secondary Analysis2▲ 1586×1 topic
  8. Healthcare Policy2▲ 86×1 topic
  9. Inequalities2▲ 175×1 topic
  10. Public Policy2▲ 15×4 topics
  11. Democracy2▲ 16×4 topics
  12. Social Media2▲ 6.7×4 topics
  13. Digital Repositories2▲ 197×2 topics
  14. Gender Studies2▲ 32×2 topics
  15. Community Engagement1▲ 15×2 topics
  16. Cultural Heritage1▲ 10×2 topics
  17. Globalization1▲ 2.5×10 topics
  18. Religion1▲ 7.8×4 topics
  19. Social Justice1▲ 9.1×3 topics
  20. Territorial Governance1▲ 32×2 topics
  21. Digital Communication1▲ 57×1 topic
  22. Gender1▲ 6.8×3 topics
  23. Information Studies1▲ 182×1 topic
  24. Professional Practices1▲ 99×1 topic
  25. Public Action1▲ 99×1 topic
  26. Institutionalization1▲ 37×2 topics
  27. Open Science1▲ 246×1 topic
  28. Scientific Data Management1▲ 246×1 topic
  29. European Union1▲ 14×3 topics
  30. Migration1▲ 11×2 topics

Which research topics does Centre de données socio-politiques de Sciences Po publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Data Analysis and Archiving, Healthcare Systems and Practices, Research Data Management Practices and French Language Learning Methods.

Data Analysis and Archiv…1Data Analysis and Archiving: 1 fractional worksHealthcare Systems and Practices: 1 fractional worksResearch Data Management Practices: 1 fractional worksFrench Language Learning Methods: 0 fractional worksAgriculture and Rural Development Research: 0 fractional worksDigital and Traditional Archives Management: 0 fractional worksSocial Sciences and Governance: 0 fractional worksEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences: 0 fractional worksData-Driven Disease Surveillance: 0 fractional worksElectoral Systems and Political Participation: 0 fractional works
Sociology and Political ScienceGeneral Health ProfessionsInformation SystemsLinguistics and Language6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Data Analysis and Archiving Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  2. 2 Healthcare Systems and Practices General Health Professions 1 works
  3. 3 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 1 works
  4. 4 French Language Learning Methods Linguistics and Language 0 works
  5. 5 Agriculture and Rural Development Research Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works
  6. 6 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 0 works
  7. 7 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 0 works
  8. 8 Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Management of Technology and Innovation 0 works
  9. 9 Data-Driven Disease Surveillance Epidemiology 0 works
  10. 10 Electoral Systems and Political Participation Political Science and International Relations 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available46.7%not open53.3%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors12.0%domestic only88.0%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Centre de données socio-politiques de Sciences Po's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 89% higher than in 2013–2017.

199520002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Paris

All research institutions in Paris

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.