Research Data Management Practices
Research Data Management Practices is a research topic within Information Systems. Science Explorer counts 17k research works in it since 1950. 10.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers revolves around the practices, challenges, and opportunities of data sharing and stewardship in scientific research. It covers topics such as open science, research data management, data reuse, metadata, ecology, digital repositories, FAIR principles, and data citation.
- Data Sharing
- Scientific Data Management
- Open Science
- Research Data
- Data Reuse
- Metadata
- Ecology
- Digital Repositories
- FAIR Principles
- Data Citation
- Research works
- 17k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 1.7k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.1% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +31% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
United States
33% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead Research Data Management Practices research?
By volume, the United States and Germany publish the most (1.5k and 1.1k works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
United States 1.5k works
- 2
Germany 1.1k works
- 3
United Kingdom 510 works
- 4
Netherlands 269 works
- 5
France 236 works
- 6
Italy 219 works
- 7
China 208 works
- 8
India 169 works
- 9
Spain 153 works
- 10
Australia 151 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Research Data Management Practices research?
By volume in 2022-now, Leibniz Association publishes the most Research Data Management Practices research, followed by Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Leibniz Association
Germany 151 works
- 2
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres
Germany 149 works
- 3
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France 69 works
- 4
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russia 51 works
- 5
Max Planck Society
Germany 39 works
- 6
National Research Council
Italy 37 works
- 7
University of Oxford
United Kingdom 36 works
- 8
DataCite
Germany 34 works
- 9
RWTH Aachen University
Germany 34 works
- 10
KU Leuven
Belgium 32 works
Who are the leading researchers in Research Data Management Practices?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Research Data Management Practices include David Moher, Rob Knight and Matthias Egger.
- 1
David Moher
Canada 898k citations
- 2
Rob Knight
United States 468k citations
- 3
Matthias Egger
Switzerland 326k citations
- 4
John P. A. Ioannidis
United States 317k citations
- 5
Mark I. McCarthy
United Kingdom 267k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Research Data Management Practices research done?
The largest centres of Research Data Management Practices research in 2022-now are Berlin (Germany), London (United Kingdom), Paris (France) and Hanover (Germany). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Mannheim and Jülich.
Largest cities, 2022-now
- 1
Berlin
Germany 149 works
- 2
London
United Kingdom 129 works
- 3
Paris
France 102 works
- 4
Hanover
Germany 83 works
- 5
Beijing
China 69 works
- 6
Washington D.C.
United States 68 works
- 7
Amsterdam
Netherlands 61 works
- 8
New York
United States 59 works
- 9
Moscow
Russia 52 works
- 10
Cologne
Germany 48 works
Where it is the local speciality
- Eggenstein-LeopoldshafenDE · 21.5 works251×
- MannheimDE · 35.2 works24×
- JülichDE · 29.1 works19×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Research Data Management Practices than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Research Data Management Practices?
Among universities, judged by research, Leiden University, University of Oxford and KU Leuven score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Research Data Management Practices, country by countryIs Research Data Management Practices research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 31% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2026. The fastest-growing topics are Research Data Management Practices.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Research Data Management Practices as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.017% in 2024.
Fractional works of Research Data Management Practices over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Research Data Management Practices. Posts are plain text and can be reported.