Science Explorer Back to mapMap

Research Data Management Practices

Research Data Management Practices is a research topic within Information Systems. Science Explorer counts 17k research works in it since 1950. 10.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers revolves around the practices, challenges, and opportunities of data sharing and stewardship in scientific research. It covers topics such as open science, research data management, data reuse, metadata, ecology, digital repositories, FAIR principles, and data citation.

  • Data Sharing
  • Scientific Data Management
  • Open Science
  • Research Data
  • Data Reuse
  • Metadata
  • Ecology
  • Digital Repositories
  • FAIR Principles
  • Data Citation
Research works
17k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
10.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+31%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
United States
33% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Research Data Management Practices

Which countries lead Research Data Management Practices research?

By volume, the United States and Germany publish the most (1.5k and 1.1k works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 United States 1.5k works
  2. 2 Germany 1.1k works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 510 works
  4. 4 Netherlands 269 works
  5. 5 France 236 works
  6. 6 Italy 219 works
  7. 7 China 208 works
  8. 8 India 169 works
  9. 9 Spain 153 works
  10. 10 Australia 151 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 32.8%Germany: 24.5%United Kingdom: 11.4%Netherlands: 6.0%6 others listed: 25.3%33%largest
United States1,474 · 32.8%Germany1,101 · 24.5%United Kingdom510 · 11.4%Netherlands269 · 6.0%6 others listed1,136 · 25.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Research Data Management Practices research?

By volume in 2022-now, Leibniz Association publishes the most Research Data Management Practices research, followed by Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

Who are the leading researchers in Research Data Management Practices?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Research Data Management Practices include David Moher, Rob Knight and Matthias Egger.

  1. 1 David Moher Canada 898k citations
  2. 2 Rob Knight United States 468k citations
  3. 3 Matthias Egger Switzerland 326k citations
  4. 4 John P. A. Ioannidis United States 317k citations
  5. 5 Mark I. McCarthy United Kingdom 267k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Research Data Management Practices?

The most cited paper in Research Data Management Practices is "The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners" (Paul A. Harris, Robert J. Taylor, Brenda L. Minor et al., 2019), with 25,189 citations. Next come "Welcome to the Tidyverse" (22,949) and "Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows" (4,440).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners Paul A. Harris, Robert J. Taylor, Brenda L. Minor et al. · Journal of Biomedical Informatics Open access 9 May 2019 25,189
2 Welcome to the Tidyverse Hadley Wickham et al. · The Journal of Open Source Software Open access 21 Nov 2019 22,949
3 Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows Paolo Di Tommaso, Maria Chatzou, Evan W. Floden et al. · Nature Biotechnology Apr 2017 4,440
4 The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines Philip Ewels, Alexander Peltzer, Sven Fillinger et al. · Nature Biotechnology Open access 13 Feb 2020 4,389
5 Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released Paul Wessel, Walter H. F. Smith, Remko Scharroo et al. · Eos 5 Nov 2013 4,121
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Research Data Management Practices research done?

The largest centres of Research Data Management Practices research in 2022-now are Berlin (Germany), London (United Kingdom), Paris (France) and Hanover (Germany). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Mannheim and Jülich.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 BerlinGermany 149 works
  2. 2 LondonUnited Kingdom 129 works
  3. 3 ParisFrance 102 works
  4. 4 HanoverGermany 83 works
  5. 5 BeijingChina 69 works
  6. 6 Washington D.C.United States 68 works
  7. 7 AmsterdamNetherlands 61 works
  8. 8 New YorkUnited States 59 works
  9. 9 MoscowRussia 52 works
  10. 10 CologneGermany 48 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Eggenstein-LeopoldshafenDE · 21.5 works251×
  2. MannheimDE · 35.2 works24×
  3. JülichDE · 29.1 works19×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Research Data Management Practices than the world average.

See Research Data Management Practices on the map

Where is the best place to study Research Data Management Practices?

Among universities, judged by research, Leiden University, University of Oxford and KU Leuven score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%30%mean 12.14%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Leiden UniversityHumboldt-Universität…KU LeuvenUniversity of Oxford
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Leiden UniversityNetherlands 81.69.8%9.7×29 +86.8%
2University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 69.25.3%4.7×36 +53.4%
3KU LeuvenBelgium 67.58.3%6.0×32 +99.7%
4Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinGermany 65.29.1%15.7×31 +64.9%
5Uppsala UniversitySweden 63.024.3%3.6×11 +140.6%
6University of SouthamptonUnited Kingdom 62.07.8%7.3×21 +32.4%
7University of ManchesterUnited Kingdom 61.57.4%5.2×24 +76.2%
8University of AmsterdamNetherlands 60.916.0%4.4×14 +18.6%
9University of South AfricaSouth Africa 59.222.1%5.0×12 +74.1%
10University of MichiganUnited States 58.211.3%2.9×24 +83.4%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Research Data Management Practices, country by country

Is Research Data Management Practices research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 31% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2026. The fastest-growing topics are Research Data Management Practices.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Research Data Management Practices as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.017% in 2024.

still counting0.020%0.040%Research Data Management Practices0.033% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Research Data Management Practices over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Research Data Management Practices9.8% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Research Data Management Practices. Posts are plain text and can be reported.