Educational Technology and Assessment
Educational Technology and Assessment is a research topic within Information Systems. Science Explorer counts 35k research works in it since 1950. 5.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the application of fuzzy logic, data mining, genetic algorithms, and concept mapping in educational assessment, including student performance evaluation, intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive learning, and diagnosis and remedial learning. The use of fuzzy logic for evaluating students' answerscripts and learning achievement is a prominent focus, along with the development of automatic examination paper generation systems and web-based testing approaches.
- Fuzzy Logic
- Educational Assessment
- Intelligent Tutoring Systems
- Adaptive Learning
- Concept Mapping
- Student Performance Evaluation
- Diagnosis and Remedial Learning
- Data Mining
- Genetic Algorithms
- Web-Based Testing
- Research works
- 35k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 2k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 5.8% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -33% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Educational Technology and Assessment research?
By volume, China and Indonesia publish the most (2k and 491 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 China 2k works
- 2 Indonesia 491 works
- 3 India 338 works
- 4 United States 245 works
- 5 Japan 119 works
- 6 Malaysia 112 works
- 7 Türkiye 81 works
- 8 Vietnam 80 works
- 9 Philippines 76 works
- 10 ?? 67 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Educational Technology and Assessment research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Shandong Institute of Commerce & Technology publishes the most Educational Technology and Assessment research, followed by China West Normal University and Indonesia University of Education.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Shandong Institute of Commerce & Technology China 24 works
- 2 China West Normal University China 20 works
- 3 Indonesia University of Education Indonesia 15 works
- 4 Binus University Indonesia 15 works
- 5 Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia 14 works
- 6 State University of Malang Indonesia 14 works
- 7 Sichuan University China 14 works
- 8 Yogyakarta State University Indonesia 14 works
- 9 Beijing Normal University China 14 works
- 10 State University of Padang Indonesia 14 works
Who are the leading researchers in Educational Technology and Assessment?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Educational Technology and Assessment include Richard G. Baraniuk, Wei Chen and George Karypis.
- 1 Richard G. Baraniuk 4.4k citations
- 2 Wei Chen 3.5k citations
- 3 George Karypis 2.7k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Educational Technology and Assessment research done?
The largest centres of Educational Technology and Assessment research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Wuhan (China), Guangzhou (China) and Jinan (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Nanchong.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- NanchongCN · 20.0 works19×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Educational Technology and Assessment than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Educational Technology and Assessment?
Among universities, judged by research, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Telkom University and Beijing Polytechnic score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham India | 59.1 | 46.5% | 5.1× | 12 | — |
| 2 | Telkom University Indonesia | 53.1 | 25.4% | 5.4× | 12 | +100.0% |
| 3 | Beijing Polytechnic China | 49.4 | 13.3% | 73.4× | 12 | +21.9% |
| 4 | Shandong Institute of Commerce & Technology China | 45.9 | 0.0% | 126.4× | 24 | -100.0% |
| 5 | Saveetha University India | 45.5 | 40.6% | 2.0× | 8 | — |
| 6 | Central China Normal University China | 44.5 | 8.5% | 10.5× | 12 | -56.8% |
| 7 | China West Normal University China | 43.8 | 0.0% | 39.5× | 20 | -70.5% |
| 8 | Binus University Indonesia | 43.5 | 16.7% | 6.2× | 15 | -5.2% |
| 9 | Shandong Normal University China | 41.4 | 6.2% | 11.1× | 12 | -45.4% |
| 10 | Bohai University China | 40.9 | 0.4% | 25.9× | 12 | +14.7% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Educational Technology and Assessment research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 33% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2011.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.