Centre for Research in Anthropology
In research, Centre for Research in Anthropology stands highest in Health Sciences (#2,860 of 11,982 worldwide), Social Sciences (#5,521 of 10,521 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#4,541 of 6,365 worldwide), 2022–2025.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #7,874 of 28,054 · #11,965 all time
- Rank in Portugal
- #52 of 187
- Research works
- 1.4k ▼ 12% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 9k 6.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 18.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 61% world 28%
What is Centre for Research in Anthropology known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #2,860 of 11,982 | 19.6% | 79 | #6770 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,521 of 10,521 | 18.0% | 173 | #4789 | |
| Social SciencesField | #4,541 of 6,365 | 14.3% | 113 | #4900 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #5,579 of 7,800 | 21.1% | 61 | #7643 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Centre for Research in Anthropology sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Health Sciences#6,770 #2,860
- Social Sciences#4,789 #5,521
- Social Sciences#4,900 #4,541
- Life Sciences#7,643 #5,579
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 17.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Veterinary 17.8×
- Arts and Humanities 3.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 2.6×
- Social Sciences 2.6×
- Health Professions 1.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.2×
- Psychology 1.1×
- Environmental Science 1.0×
- Nursing 1.0×
- Dentistry 0.9×
- Medicine 0.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.7×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Centre for Research in Anthropology?
Ranked on the composite score, Joâo Leal, Luís Silva and Jorge Freitas Branco lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Centre for Research in Anthropology.
- 1 Joâo Leal Portugal · #219,274 worldwide 22 citations · 40 works
- 2 Luís Silva Portugal · #250,565 worldwide 82 citations · 25 works
- 3 Jorge Freitas Branco Portugal · #268,021 worldwide 0 citations · 41 works
- 4 Frederico Delgado Rosa Portugal · #455,653 worldwide 1 citations · 38 works
- 5 Clara Saraiva Portugal · #623,780 worldwide 11 citations · 17 works
- 6 Donizete Rodrigues Portugal · #635,170 worldwide 5 citations · 26 works
- 7 José Mapril Portugal · #680,698 worldwide 7 citations · 24 works
- 8 Susana de Matos Viegas Portugal · #770,625 worldwide 8 citations · 18 works
- 9 Sónia Vespeira de Almeida Portugal · #847,417 worldwide 1 citations · 15 works
- 10 José Carlos Pinto da Costa Portugal · #851,195 worldwide 0 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Centre for Research in Anthropology?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Colonialism, Cultural Identity, Public Policy, Identity, Community Engagement, Epidemiology and Public Health.
- Human Evolution
- Aging Population
- Ancient DNA
- Skeletal Development
- Sex Determination
- Ethnography
- Community Participation
- Brazil
- Nationalism
- Neoliberalism
- Cultural Studies
- Migration
- Urban Ethnography
- Social Dynamics
- History
- Quality of Life
- Community Engagement
- Identity
- Cultural Identity
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Colonialism
- Public Health
- Public Policy
- Sustainability
- Religion
- Mental Health
- Social Justice
- Youth Culture
- Politics
- Culture
- Social Support
- Genomic Analysis
- Cultural Heritage
- Ethnicity
- Health
- Age Estimation
- Elderly Care
- Secularism
- Anthropology
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization42▲ 6.2×45 topics
- Epidemiology27▲ 1.97×80 topics
- Colonialism18▲ 11×19 topics
- Cultural Identity17▲ 9.6×13 topics
- Public Health16▲ 3.3×35 topics
- Identity16▲ 6.4×26 topics
- Public Policy15▲ 8.8×11 topics
- Community Engagement14▲ 12×8 topics
- Sustainability14▲ 1.62×32 topics
- Quality of Life11▲ 2.2×30 topics
- Religion10▲ 6.2×15 topics
- History10▲ 4.1×18 topics
- Mental Health10▲ 1.90×24 topics
- Social Dynamics9▲ 41×2 topics
- Social Justice9▲ 4.2×13 topics
- Urban Ethnography8▲ 111×1 topic
- Youth Culture8▲ 111×1 topic
- Migration8▲ 7.2×12 topics
- Politics8▲ 8.5×9 topics
- Cultural Studies8▲ 6.0×10 topics
- Culture8▲ 4.3×13 topics
- Neoliberalism8▲ 6.2×10 topics
- Social Support8▲ 4.0×11 topics
- Nationalism8▲ 4.8×12 topics
- Genomic Analysis7▲ 8.7×9 topics
- Brazil7▲ 22×5 topics
- Cultural Heritage7▲ 3.9×12 topics
- Community Participation7▲ 5.5×5 topics
- Ethnicity7▲ 5.4×10 topics
- Ethnography7▲ 11×5 topics
- Health7▲ 4.8×14 topics
- Sex Determination6▲ 49×2 topics
- Age Estimation6▲ 28×1 topic
- Skeletal Development6▲ 77×1 topic
- Elderly Care6▲ 11×3 topics
- Ancient DNA5▲ 28×4 topics
- Secularism5▲ 14×3 topics
- Aging Population5▲ 15×2 topics
- Anthropology5▲ 14×6 topics
- Human Evolution5▲ 64×2 topics
Which research topics does Centre for Research in Anthropology publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Urban and sociocultural dynamics, Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies, History, Culture, and Society and Anthropological Studies and Insights.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Urban and sociocultural dynamics Urban Studies 8 works
- 2 Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies Archeology 6 works
- 3 History, Culture, and Society Speech and Hearing 5 works
- 4 Anthropological Studies and Insights Anthropology 4 works
- 5 Religious Tourism and Spaces Geography, Planning and Development 3 works
- 6 Religion and Society in Latin America Sociology and Political Science 3 works
- 7 Urban Development and Societal Issues Urban Studies 3 works
- 8 Paleopathology and ancient diseases Archeology 3 works
- 9 Veterinary Oncology Research Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2 works
- 10 Literature, Culture, and Criticism Literature and Literary Theory 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Centre for Research in Anthropology's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 12% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Lisbon
- University of Lisbon
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa
- Instituto Superior Técnico
- Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa
- Universidade Católica Portuguesa
- Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
- Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento
- Instituto de Telecomunicações
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.