- Research works
- 105 ▲ 215% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 722 6.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 2.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 85% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Crossref is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 16.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 16.2×
- Chemical Engineering 5.1×
- Computer Science 4.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.9×
- Nursing 1.8×
- Psychology 1.6×
- Health Professions 1.4×
- Arts and Humanities 1.4×
- Social Sciences 1.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.2×
- Energy 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Crossref?
Ranked on the composite score, Alice Meadows, Ginny Hendricks and Ed Pentz lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Crossref.
- 1 Alice Meadows United States · #661,873 worldwide 28 citations · 16 works
- 2 Ginny Hendricks United States · #723,272 worldwide 32 citations · 15 works
- 3 Ed Pentz United States · #842,260 worldwide 9 citations · 18 works
- 4 Rachael Lammey United States · #1,092,785 worldwide 16 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at Crossref?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Digital Repositories, Data Citation, Data Sharing, Scientific Data Management, Semantic Web, Linked Data, Identity and Data Integration.
- Youth
- Social Media
- Ontology
- Feminism
- Preprints
- Politics
- COVID-19
- Reproducibility
- Research Evaluation
- Bibliometric Analysis
- Data Integration
- Linked Data
- Scientific Data Management
- Data Citation
- Digital Repositories
- Data Sharing
- Semantic Web
- Identity
- Workflow Management
- Nationalism
- Education
- Scientific Workflows
- Bibliographic Framework
- Resource Description and Access
- Science Communication
- Neural Machine Translation
- RDF
- Statistical Machine Translation
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 28 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 28 words, with their numbers
- Digital Repositories5▲ 612×2 topics
- Data Citation4▲ 299×2 topics
- Data Sharing4▲ 491×1 topic
- Scientific Data Management4▲ 608×1 topic
- Semantic Web3▲ 104×3 topics
- Linked Data2▲ 198×2 topics
- Identity2▲ 9.8×4 topics
- Data Integration2▲ 39×3 topics
- Workflow Management2▲ 81×2 topics
- Bibliometric Analysis2▲ 98×1 topic
- Nationalism2▲ 12×3 topics
- Research Evaluation2▲ 233×1 topic
- Education1▲ 2.9×5 topics
- Reproducibility1▲ 142×1 topic
- Scientific Workflows1▲ 142×1 topic
- COVID-191▲ 3.4×2 topics
- Bibliographic Framework1▲ 625×1 topic
- Politics1▲ 15×2 topics
- Resource Description and Access1▲ 625×1 topic
- Preprints1▲ 280×1 topic
- Science Communication1▲ 50×1 topic
- Feminism1▲ 13×3 topics
- Neural Machine Translation1▲ 37×1 topic
- Ontology1▲ 46×1 topic
- RDF1▲ 111×1 topic
- Social Media1▲ 2.5×1 topic
- Statistical Machine Translation1▲ 37×1 topic
- Youth1▲ 26×1 topic
Which research topics does Crossref publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Research Data Management Practices, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Scientific Computing and Data Management and Library Science and Information Systems.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 4 works
- 2 scientometrics and bibliometrics research Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2 works
- 3 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 1 works
- 4 Library Science and Information Systems Information Systems 1 works
- 5 Academic Publishing and Open Access Information Systems and Management 1 works
- 6 Semantic Web and Ontologies Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 7 Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 8 Natural Language Processing Techniques Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 9 Diversity and Career in Medicine Gender Studies 1 works
- 10 Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Economics and Econometrics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Crossref's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 215% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.