Danish Institute for Human Rights

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Danish Institute for Human Rights sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Social Sciences takes 5.0× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

1. Social SciencesField · 27.7 works5.0×

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

• Social Sciences 5.0×
• Business, Management and Accounting 2.8×
• Psychology 2.2×
• Arts and Humanities 1.2×
• Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.1×
• Health Professions 0.9×
• Nursing 0.6×
• Environmental Science 0.5×
• Medicine 0.3×
• Neuroscience 0.3×
• Decision Sciences 0.3×
• Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.2×
• Engineering 0.2×
• Computer Science 0.2×
• Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
• Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.0×

Ranked on the composite score, Peter Scharff Smith, Rikke Frank Jørgensen and Agnete L. Andersen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Danish Institute for Human Rights.

1. 1 🇩🇰 Peter Scharff Smith Denmark · #295,665 worldwide 52 citations · 19 works
2. 2 🇩🇰 Rikke Frank Jørgensen Denmark · #448,552 worldwide 20 citations · 20 works
3. 3 🇩🇰 Agnete L. Andersen Denmark · #564,660 worldwide 0 citations · 19 works
4. 4 🇩🇰 Kirsten Precht Denmark · #671,302 worldwide 0 citations · 17 works
5. 5 🇩🇰 Hans-Otto Sano Denmark · #1,184,169 worldwide 3 citations · 15 works
6. 6 🇩🇰 Marie Juul Petersen Denmark · #1,393,109 worldwide 6 citations · 19 works

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Human Rights, Global Governance, International Law, Social Inequality, Development, Millennium Development Goals, Accountability and European Union.

By volume in 2022–2025: Human Rights and Development, Corporate Law and Human Rights, Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research and European and International Law Studies.

1. 1 Human Rights and Development Sociology and Political Science 4 works
2. 2 Corporate Law and Human Rights Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 3 works
3. 3 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 2 works
4. 4 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 2 works
5. 5 European Criminal Justice and Data Protection Political Science and International Relations 2 works
6. 6 International Law and Human Rights Political Science and International Relations 1 works
7. 7 Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics History 1 works
8. 8 Ombudsman and Human Rights Sociology and Political Science 1 works
9. 9 Eastern European Communism and Reforms Sociology and Political Science 1 works
10. 10 Migration, Refugees, and Integration Sociology and Political Science 1 works

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

Output in 2018–2022 was 16% lower than in 2013–2017.

• University of Copenhagen
• Rigshospitalet
• Copenhagen Business School
• Copenhagen University Hospital
• Gentofte Hospital
• Bispebjerg Hospital
• Statens Serum Institut
• Novo Nordisk (Denmark)