- World rank, 2022–2025
- #27,346 of 28,054 · #40,321 all time
- Rank in India
- #1,811 of 1,840
- Research works
- 189 ▲ 67% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 1.5k 7.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 56% world 28%
What does Directorate of Cashew Research specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Agricultural and Biological Sciences takes 9.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Agricultural and Biological SciencesField · 27.3 works9.1×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 9.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9.1×
- Nursing 6.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.1×
- Health Professions 1.1×
- Dentistry 1.1×
- Chemistry 1.0×
- Environmental Science 0.7×
- Psychology 0.7×
- Medicine 0.7×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Social Sciences 0.2×
- Arts and Humanities 0.2×
- Energy 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Directorate of Cashew Research?
Ranked on the composite score, Shamsudheen Mangalassery, K. Vanitha and Siddanna Savadi lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Directorate of Cashew Research.
- 1 Shamsudheen Mangalassery India · #631,849 worldwide 35 citations · 23 works
- 2 K. Vanitha India · #1,478,576 worldwide 8 citations · 25 works
- 3 Siddanna Savadi India · #1,536,235 worldwide 16 citations · 18 works
Which keywords describe research at Directorate of Cashew Research?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Antioxidant, Flavonoids, Pharmacokinetics, Neuroprotective, Dementia, Ginkgo Biloba, Genetics and Climate Change.
- QTL Mapping
- Plant Secondary Metabolites
- Genetic Variability
- Anthocyanins
- AFLP Markers
- Antioxidant Properties
- Heterosis
- Gene Expression
- Domestication
- Dormancy
- Nutrient Uptake
- Antioxidants
- Lignocellulosic Biomass
- Biological Control
- Enzymatic Hydrolysis
- Drought Tolerance
- Genetics
- Dementia
- Pharmacokinetics
- Climate Change
- Antioxidant
- Flavonoids
- Neuroprotective
- Ginkgo Biloba
- Breeding
- Rootstock
- Genetic Diversity
- Transcriptome Analysis
- Pretreatment
- Health Benefits
- Nutritional Quality
- Fruit Trees
- Phylogenetic Analysis
- Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles
- Jasmonate Signaling
- Phenolic Compounds
- Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation
- Cardiovascular Health
- Okra Genetics
- Grapevine
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Antioxidant6▲ 15×11 topics
- Climate Change6▲ 3.4×11 topics
- Flavonoids5▲ 31×4 topics
- Pharmacokinetics5▲ 28×3 topics
- Neuroprotective4▲ 47×2 topics
- Dementia4▲ 74×1 topic
- Ginkgo Biloba4▲ 702×1 topic
- Genetics4▲ 9.4×5 topics
- Breeding3▲ 66×4 topics
- Drought Tolerance3▲ 35×6 topics
- Rootstock3▲ 87×2 topics
- Enzymatic Hydrolysis3▲ 44×2 topics
- Genetic Diversity3▲ 9.9×10 topics
- Biological Control3▲ 28×4 topics
- Transcriptome Analysis3▲ 65×3 topics
- Lignocellulosic Biomass2▲ 39×1 topic
- Pretreatment2▲ 69×1 topic
- Antioxidants2▲ 8.3×6 topics
- Health Benefits2▲ 11×5 topics
- Nutrient Uptake2▲ 53×2 topics
- Nutritional Quality2▲ 48×2 topics
- Dormancy2▲ 94×1 topic
- Fruit Trees2▲ 94×1 topic
- Domestication2▲ 64×3 topics
- Phylogenetic Analysis2▲ 11×5 topics
- Gene Expression2▲ 5.3×3 topics
- Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles2▲ 76×1 topic
- Heterosis2▲ 85×2 topics
- Jasmonate Signaling2▲ 76×1 topic
- Antioxidant Properties2▲ 21×2 topics
- Phenolic Compounds2▲ 16×2 topics
- AFLP Markers2▲ 93×2 topics
- Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation2▲ 71×1 topic
- Anthocyanins2▲ 42×2 topics
- Cardiovascular Health2▲ 14×3 topics
- Genetic Variability2▲ 76×1 topic
- Okra Genetics2▲ 251×1 topic
- Plant Secondary Metabolites2▲ 39×1 topic
- Grapevine2▲ 66×2 topics
- QTL Mapping2▲ 23×5 topics
Which research topics does Directorate of Cashew Research publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications, Biofuel production and bioconversion, Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications Complementary and alternative medicine 4 works
- 2 Biofuel production and bioconversion Biomedical Engineering 2 works
- 3 Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies Plant Science 2 works
- 4 Insect-Plant Interactions and Control Insect Science 2 works
- 5 Agricultural Practices and Plant Genetics Plant Science 2 works
- 6 Plant tissue culture and regeneration Molecular Biology 2 works
- 7 Horticultural and Viticultural Research Plant Science 2 works
- 8 Banana Cultivation and Research Plant Science 2 works
- 9 Microfinance and Financial Inclusion Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 10 Nuts composition and effects Nutrition and Dietetics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Directorate of Cashew Research's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 67% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.