Environmental Technologies (United States)
In research, Environmental Technologies (United States) stands highest in Physical Sciences (#8,104 of 21,541 worldwide) and Engineering (#6,376 of 11,412 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #13,635 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #2,989 of 8,685
- Research works
- 455 ▼ 33% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 15k 32.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.6% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 30% world 28%
What is Environmental Technologies (United States) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #8,104 of 21,541 | 23.0% | 342 | |
| EngineeringField | #6,376 of 11,412 | 29.2% | 133 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Environmental Technologies (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 4.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Environmental Science 4.7×
- Chemistry 4.3×
- Energy 2.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2.1×
- Materials Science 2.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 2.1×
- Engineering 1.6×
- Nursing 1.5×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.9×
- Dentistry 0.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.5×
- Arts and Humanities 0.4×
- Health Professions 0.4×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Mathematics 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Psychology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Environmental Technologies (United States)?
Ranked on the composite score, E.R. Kinkead and R.E. Wolfe lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Environmental Technologies (United States).
- 1 E.R. Kinkead United States · #1,481,795 worldwide 20 citations · 26 works
- 2 R.E. Wolfe United States · #1,620,132 worldwide 2 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at Environmental Technologies (United States)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Environmental Impact, Nanomaterials, Waste Management, Land Use Change, Recycling, Pollution, Toxicity and Agricultural Sustainability.
- Vibrational Spectroscopy
- Neural Network
- Environmental Management
- Microbial Communities
- Global Carbon Budget
- Marine Environment
- Agricultural Sustainability
- Pollution
- Graphene
- Nanocomposites
- Remote Sensing
- Waste Management
- Biomedical Applications
- Nanomaterials
- Environmental Impact
- Climate Change
- Land Use Change
- Recycling
- Renewable Energy
- Sustainability
- Knowledge Management
- Toxicity
- Machine Learning
- Catalysis
- Life Cycle Assessment
- Control System
- Microplastics
- Terrestrial Ecosystems
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 28 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 28 words, with their numbers
- Environmental Impact5▲ 6.7×15 topics
- Nanomaterials2▲ 4.9×10 topics
- Climate Change2▲ 1.59×10 topics
- Biomedical Applications2▲ 3.4×7 topics
- Land Use Change2▲ 13×3 topics
- Waste Management2▲ 10×4 topics
- Recycling2▲ 10×3 topics
- Remote Sensing2▲ 3.0×4 topics
- Renewable Energy2▲ 2.4×11 topics
- Nanocomposites1▲ 4.1×5 topics
- Sustainability1▲ 1.41×11 topics
- Graphene1▲ 4.5×6 topics
- Knowledge Management1▲ 5.8×2 topics
- Pollution1▲ 16×3 topics
- Toxicity1▲ 7.3×7 topics
- Agricultural Sustainability1▲ 25×2 topics
- Machine Learning1◆ 0.91×4 topics
- Marine Environment1▲ 19×2 topics
- Catalysis1▲ 3.8×7 topics
- Global Carbon Budget1▲ 37×2 topics
- Life Cycle Assessment1▲ 9.6×5 topics
- Microbial Communities1▲ 6.1×3 topics
- Control System1▲ 44×1 topic
- Environmental Management1▲ 6.0×4 topics
- Microplastics1▲ 25×1 topic
- Neural Network1▲ 12×1 topic
- Terrestrial Ecosystems1▲ 25×1 topic
- Vibrational Spectroscopy1▲ 31×2 topics
Which research topics does Environmental Technologies (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Microplastics and Plastic Pollution, Industrial Technology and Control Systems, Soil erosion and sediment transport and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Microplastics and Plastic Pollution Pollution 1 works
- 2 Industrial Technology and Control Systems Control and Systems Engineering 1 works
- 3 Soil erosion and sediment transport Soil Science 1 works
- 4 Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1 works
- 5 Remote Sensing in Agriculture Ecology 1 works
- 6 Water Quality and Pollution Assessment Water Science and Technology 1 works
- 7 Recycling and Waste Management Techniques Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 1 works
- 8 biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties Biomaterials 1 works
- 9 Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts Pollution 1 works
- 10 Remote Sensing and Land Use Atmospheric Science 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Environmental Technologies (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 33% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.