Family Planning NSW
In research, Family Planning NSW stands highest in Medicine (#14,753 of 17,978 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#16,891 of 20,462 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #31,971 of 42,892
- Rank in Australia
- #559 of 656
- Research works
- 302 ▲ 13% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 5.1k 17.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 20.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 30% world 28%
What is Family Planning NSW known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedicineField | #14,753 of 17,978 | 18.1% | 128 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #16,891 of 20,462 | 18.1% | 158 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Family Planning NSW sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 2.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 2.6×
- Medicine 2.0×
- Health Professions 1.8×
- Environmental Science 1.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.5×
- Neuroscience 1.5×
- Social Sciences 1.3×
- Energy 0.8×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.6×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Arts and Humanities 0.5×
- Dentistry 0.4×
- Decision Sciences 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Family Planning NSW?
Ranked on the composite score, Edith Weisberg, Kathleen McNamee and Yan Cheng lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Family Planning NSW.
- 1 Edith Weisberg Australia · #249,814 worldwide 64 citations · 26 works
- 2 Kathleen McNamee Australia · #529,576 worldwide 24 citations · 24 works
- 3 Yan Cheng Australia · #728,111 worldwide 22 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at Family Planning NSW?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Family Planning, Reproductive Health, Contraception, Unintended Pregnancy, Global Trends, Maternal Mortality, Child Mortality and Health Systems.
- Social Impact Assessment
- Risk Factors
- Health Disparities
- Psychological Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Sustainability Assessment
- Health Impact Assessment
- Cesarean Section
- Environmental Impact Assessment
- Health Systems
- Quality of Life
- Global Trends
- Unintended Pregnancy
- Reproductive Health
- Family Planning
- Contraception
- Epidemiology
- Maternal Mortality
- Child Mortality
- Mental Health
- Sustainability
- Gender Bias
- Resilience
- Vaginal Birth
- Infertility
- Assisted Reproductive Technology
- Remote Sensing
- Stress
- Strategic Environmental Assessment
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 29 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 29 words, with their numbers
- Family Planning5▲ 207×3 topics
- Reproductive Health4▲ 212×2 topics
- Contraception4▲ 389×1 topic
- Unintended Pregnancy4▲ 389×1 topic
- Epidemiology2▲ 1.47×14 topics
- Global Trends2▲ 67×2 topics
- Maternal Mortality2▲ 24×4 topics
- Quality of Life2▲ 3.0×10 topics
- Child Mortality2▲ 56×1 topic
- Health Systems2▲ 56×1 topic
- Mental Health2▲ 2.4×9 topics
- Environmental Impact Assessment1▲ 46×2 topics
- Sustainability1▲ 1.31×8 topics
- Cesarean Section1▲ 78×1 topic
- Gender Bias1▲ 36×2 topics
- Health Impact Assessment1▲ 37×2 topics
- Resilience1▲ 6.3×5 topics
- Sustainability Assessment1▲ 22×3 topics
- Vaginal Birth1▲ 78×1 topic
- Environmental Impact1▲ 1.60×6 topics
- Infertility1▲ 20×3 topics
- Psychological Impact1▲ 8.6×5 topics
- Assisted Reproductive Technology1▲ 39×2 topics
- Health Disparities1▲ 9.7×6 topics
- Remote Sensing1▲ 2.0×5 topics
- Risk Factors1▲ 2.4×7 topics
- Stress1▲ 7.1×2 topics
- Social Impact Assessment1▲ 71×1 topic
- Strategic Environmental Assessment1▲ 238×1 topic
Which research topics does Family Planning NSW publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Reproductive Health and Contraception, Global Maternal and Child Health, Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Reproductive Health and Contraception Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4 works
- 2 Global Maternal and Child Health Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2 works
- 3 Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions Obstetrics and Gynecology 1 works
- 4 Environmental and Social Impact Assessments Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
- 5 Reproductive Health and Technologies Reproductive Medicine 1 works
- 6 Disaster Management and Resilience Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 7 Diversity and Career in Medicine Gender Studies 1 works
- 8 Breastfeeding Practices and Influences Epidemiology 1 works
- 9 Building Energy and Comfort Optimization Building and Construction 1 works
- 10 LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy Social Psychology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Family Planning NSW's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 13% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.