Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais
In research, Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais stands highest in Physical Sciences (#4,737 of 12,888 worldwide), Engineering (#3,480 of 6,636 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#5,633 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Information Systems and Management, Literature and Literary Theory and Building and Construction — Information Systems and Management is 8.5× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #6,933 of 28,054 · #8,764 all time
- Rank in Brazil
- #80 of 714
- Research works
- 5.3k ▲ 73% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 34k 6.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 59% world 28%
What is Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #4,737 of 12,888 | 5.8% | 766 | #5695 | |
| EngineeringField | #3,480 of 6,636 | 5.1% | 364 | #3510 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,633 of 10,521 | 4.8% | 522 | #6990 | |
| Social SciencesField | #4,329 of 6,365 | 4.6% | 293 | #5312 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #3,913 of 4,667 | 5.8% | 116 | #3778 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #10,913 of 11,982 | 10.6% | 60 | #16904 | |
| Physics and AstronomyField | #1,509 of 1,646 | 12.1% | 72 | #2898 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #3,321 of 3,551 | 4.3% | 99 | #5296 | |
| Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield | #2,435 of 2,578 | 3.2% | 96 | #3456 | |
| EducationSubfield | #1,799 of 1,892 | 4.4% | 93 | #2135 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Physical Sciences#5,695 #4,737
- Engineering#3,510 #3,480
- Social Sciences#6,990 #5,633
- Social Sciences#5,312 #4,329
- Computer Science#3,778 #3,913
- Health Sciences#16,904 #10,913
- Physics and Astronomy#2,898 #1,509
- Environmental Science#5,296 #3,321
- Sociology and Political Science#3,456 #2,435
- Education#2,135 #1,799
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Information Systems and Management takes 8.5× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Information Systems and ManagementSubfield · 34.3 works8.5×
- Literature and Literary TheorySubfield · 59.5 works7.9×
- Building and ConstructionSubfield · 46.5 works5.3×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 3.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 3.6×
- Arts and Humanities 2.8×
- Physics and Astronomy 2.3×
- Engineering 1.7×
- Social Sciences 1.6×
- Environmental Science 1.4×
- Materials Science 1.2×
- Energy 1.1×
- Computer Science 1.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.9×
- Chemistry 0.7×
- Mathematics 0.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Health Professions 0.5×
- Psychology 0.5×
- Nursing 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.3×
- Veterinary 0.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Dentistry 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais?
Ranked on the composite score, Paulo Henrique Ribeiro Borges, Rafael Alípio and Margareth Spangler Andrade lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais.
- 1 Paulo Henrique Ribeiro Borges Brazil · #154,439 worldwide 292 citations · 27 works
- 2 Rafael Alípio Brazil · #175,391 worldwide 157 citations · 34 works
- 3 Margareth Spangler Andrade Brazil · #241,567 worldwide 72 citations · 27 works
- 4 Paulo E. M. Almeida Brazil · #257,415 worldwide 125 citations · 23 works
- 5 Gray Farias Moita Brazil · #392,421 worldwide 43 citations · 22 works
- 6 Márcia Gorett Ribeiro Grossi Brazil · #394,617 worldwide 9 citations · 23 works
- 7 Ana Elisa Ribeiro Brazil · #438,295 worldwide 3 citations · 27 works
- 8 Marco Aurélio O. Schroeder Brazil · #466,182 worldwide 57 citations · 28 works
- 9 G. A. Barbosa Brazil · #557,083 worldwide 82 citations · 36 works
- 10 Valter J. S. Leite Brazil · #583,545 worldwide 98 citations · 43 works
Which keywords describe research at Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Teacher Training, Qualitative Research, Public Policy, Online Learning, Colonialism, Social Inequality, Brazil and Educational Technology.
- Bakhtin Circle
- Educational Practices
- Educational Policies
- Inclusive Education
- Distance Learning
- Research Methods
- Marketing Strategies
- Innovation Management
- Data Analysis
- Social Impact
- Cultural Identity
- Social Network Analysis
- Curriculum Development
- Mechanical Properties
- Social Inequality
- Colonialism
- Environmental Impact
- Education
- Public Policy
- Qualitative Research
- Teacher Training
- Sustainability
- Online Learning
- Educational Technology
- Globalization
- Identity
- Brazil
- Discourse Analysis
- Digital Literacy
- WebQuests
- Literature
- Anthropology
- Cultural Studies
- Educational Reform
- Organizational Management
- Waste Management
- Pedagogical Practices
- Critical Pedagogy
- Rhetoric
- Literacy
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Teacher Training88▲ 10×12 topics
- Qualitative Research81▲ 6.6×11 topics
- Sustainability67▲ 1.95×43 topics
- Public Policy66▲ 9.6×12 topics
- Online Learning64▲ 5.5×10 topics
- Education63▲ 2.6×43 topics
- Educational Technology60▲ 3.6×18 topics
- Environmental Impact58▲ 2.4×35 topics
- Globalization56▲ 2.0×42 topics
- Colonialism47▲ 7.1×7 topics
- Identity47▲ 4.5×19 topics
- Social Inequality44▲ 12×7 topics
- Brazil44▲ 32×5 topics
- Mechanical Properties43▲ 3.1×29 topics
- Discourse Analysis41▲ 11×4 topics
- Curriculum Development40▲ 4.1×6 topics
- Digital Literacy36▲ 4.3×2 topics
- Social Network Analysis36▲ 21×1 topic
- WebQuests36▲ 45×1 topic
- Cultural Identity34▲ 4.7×11 topics
- Literature34▲ 4.5×14 topics
- Social Impact33▲ 6.0×9 topics
- Anthropology33▲ 24×6 topics
- Data Analysis33▲ 8.6×4 topics
- Cultural Studies33▲ 6.1×14 topics
- Innovation Management33▲ 14×3 topics
- Educational Reform32▲ 18×3 topics
- Marketing Strategies32▲ 23×2 topics
- Organizational Management32▲ 34×1 topic
- Research Methods32▲ 14×1 topic
- Waste Management31▲ 5.4×6 topics
- Distance Learning30▲ 6.4×4 topics
- Pedagogical Practices30▲ 24×3 topics
- Inclusive Education30▲ 6.1×5 topics
- Critical Pedagogy29▲ 24×2 topics
- Educational Policies28▲ 17×1 topic
- Rhetoric28▲ 18×2 topics
- Educational Practices26▲ 30×2 topics
- Literacy26▲ 26×2 topics
- Bakhtin Circle25▲ 51×1 topic
Which research topics does Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education and Digital Technologies, Business and Management Studies, Education Pedagogy and Practices and Linguistics and Education Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 36 works
- 2 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 32 works
- 3 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 28 works
- 4 Linguistics and Education Research Literature and Literary Theory 25 works
- 5 Literature, Culture, and Criticism Literature and Literary Theory 23 works
- 6 Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies Philosophy 20 works
- 7 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 18 works
- 8 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 17 works
- 9 Education and Public Policy Political Science and International Relations 17 works
- 10 Concrete and Cement Materials Research Civil and Structural Engineering 16 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 73% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Belo Horizonte
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
- Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais
- Secretaria Municipal de Saúde
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais
- Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais
- Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.