Forest Products Laboratory
In research, Forest Products Laboratory stands highest in Physical Sciences (#8,458 of 12,888 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Biomaterials and Materials Science — Biomaterials is 29.4× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #14,228 of 28,054 · #7,492 all time
- Rank in United States
- #1,985 of 4,192
- Research works
- 2.4k ◆ 0% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 86k 36.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 21.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 24% world 28%
What is Forest Products Laboratory known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #8,458 of 12,888 | 19.7% | 128 | #5771 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Forest Products Laboratory sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Forest Products Laboratory specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Biomaterials takes 29.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- BiomaterialsSubfield · 20.0 works29×
- Materials ScienceField · 35.4 works6.4×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Materials Science, 6.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Materials Science 6.4×
- Environmental Science 3.0×
- Engineering 2.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2.3×
- Chemistry 2.0×
- Chemical Engineering 1.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Nursing 0.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Energy 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.4×
- Arts and Humanities 0.4×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Veterinary 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Health Professions 0.0×
- Medicine 0.0×
- Decision Sciences 0.0×
- Psychology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Forest Products Laboratory?
Ranked on the composite score, T. Kent Kirk, J. Y. Zhu and D. Jean Lodge lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Forest Products Laboratory.
- 1 T. Kent Kirk United States · #17,831 worldwide 1.2k citations · 44 works
- 2 J. Y. Zhu United States · #37,168 worldwide 525 citations · 41 works
- 3 D. Jean Lodge United States · #63,023 worldwide 362 citations · 46 works
- 4 Roger M. Rowell United States · #110,470 worldwide 296 citations · 56 works
- 5 Kenneth E. Skog United States · #158,112 worldwide 111 citations · 32 works
- 6 Frederick Green United States · #168,237 worldwide 121 citations · 24 works
- 7 William T. Simpson United States · #221,164 worldwide 175 citations · 29 works
- 8 Nicole M. Stark United States · #249,406 worldwide 228 citations · 34 works
- 9 Terry L. Highley United States · #255,409 worldwide 121 citations · 29 works
- 10 Kenneth E. Hammel United States · #272,706 worldwide 236 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Forest Products Laboratory?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Biomedical Applications, Mechanical Properties, Ionic Liquids, Cellulose Nanocrystals, Nanocellulose, Microstructure, FTIR Analysis and Wood Chemistry.
- Water Footprint
- Root Reinforcement
- Climate Change Impact
- Antimicrobial
- Pretreatment
- Biomaterials
- Biomass Estimation
- Composites
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Natural Fibers
- Biomass
- Biodegradable Polymers
- Sustainability
- Lignin Valorization
- Polymeric Materials
- Nanocomposites
- Wood Chemistry
- Microstructure
- Cellulose Nanocrystals
- Mechanical Properties
- Biomedical Applications
- Ionic Liquids
- Nanocellulose
- FTIR Analysis
- Environmental Impact
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
- Catalytic Transformation
- Climate Change
- Life Cycle Assessment
- Tissue Engineering
- Forest Management
- Lignocellulosic Biomass
- Biodegradable
- Reinforced Polymers
- Aboveground Biomass
- Enzymatic Hydrolysis
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Renewable Resources
- Carbon Footprint
- Slope Stability
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Biomedical Applications24▲ 12×15 topics
- Mechanical Properties21▲ 14×14 topics
- Ionic Liquids15▲ 34×5 topics
- Cellulose Nanocrystals13▲ 189×1 topic
- Nanocellulose13▲ 189×1 topic
- Microstructure12▲ 15×4 topics
- FTIR Analysis12▲ 463×1 topic
- Wood Chemistry12▲ 463×1 topic
- Environmental Impact12▲ 4.3×21 topics
- Nanocomposites11▲ 8.5×13 topics
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance10▲ 132×2 topics
- Polymeric Materials10▲ 87×3 topics
- Catalytic Transformation10▲ 185×1 topic
- Lignin Valorization10▲ 185×1 topic
- Climate Change9▲ 2.1×33 topics
- Sustainability7▲ 1.73×14 topics
- Life Cycle Assessment6▲ 14×4 topics
- Biodegradable Polymers6▲ 23×4 topics
- Tissue Engineering6▲ 6.1×6 topics
- Biomass6▲ 33×4 topics
- Forest Management6▲ 58×3 topics
- Natural Fibers5▲ 52×2 topics
- Lignocellulosic Biomass5▲ 30×2 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation4▲ 7.5×8 topics
- Biodegradable4▲ 36×2 topics
- Composites4▲ 35×1 topic
- Reinforced Polymers4▲ 51×1 topic
- Biomass Estimation4▲ 17×3 topics
- Aboveground Biomass4▲ 27×2 topics
- Biomaterials4▲ 10×3 topics
- Enzymatic Hydrolysis4▲ 23×1 topic
- Pretreatment4▲ 41×1 topic
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions3▲ 7.8×3 topics
- Antimicrobial3▲ 7.2×3 topics
- Renewable Resources3▲ 12×3 topics
- Climate Change Impact3▲ 8.8×3 topics
- Carbon Footprint3▲ 28×1 topic
- Root Reinforcement3▲ 88×1 topic
- Slope Stability3▲ 78×1 topic
- Water Footprint3▲ 33×1 topic
Which research topics does Forest Products Laboratory publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies, Wood Treatment and Properties, Lignin and Wood Chemistry and Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Advanced Cellulose Research Studies Biomaterials 13 works
- 2 Wood Treatment and Properties Building and Construction 12 works
- 3 Lignin and Wood Chemistry Biomedical Engineering 10 works
- 4 Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites Polymers and Plastics 4 works
- 5 Biofuel production and bioconversion Biomedical Engineering 4 works
- 6 Environmental Impact and Sustainability Environmental Engineering 3 works
- 7 Tree Root and Stability Studies Mechanical Engineering 3 works
- 8 Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging Biomaterials 3 works
- 9 Forest Biomass Utilization and Management Mechanics of Materials 3 works
- 10 Forest ecology and management Nature and Landscape Conservation 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Forest Products Laboratory's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 0% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Madison
- University of Wisconsin–Madison
- University of Wisconsin System
- UW Health University Hospital
- Madison Group (United States)
- Northern Research Station
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
- Exact Sciences (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.