Biomaterials research
Biomaterials is a subfield of Materials Science. Science Explorer counts 411k research works in it since 1950. 9.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
In short: any substance that has been engineered to interact with biological systems for a medical purpose.
- Research works
- 411k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 41k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 9.9% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Topics
- 13
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +24% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
China
46% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
What is Biomaterials research about, and what is growing?
By the world's output in 2021-25, its most used keywords are Biomedical Applications, Nanocomposites, Drug Delivery, Tissue Engineering, Biodegradable Polymers, Biomaterials. Gaining share since 2011-15: Chitin, Chitosan, Cellulose Nanocrystals, Nanocellulose, Antioxidant. Losing share: Calotropis procera, Latex, Bioinspired Materials, Biomineralization.
- Latex
- Gelatin
- Peptide-Directed Materials
- Biomineralization
- Spider Silk
- Halloysite
- Supramolecular
- Magnesium Alloys
- Self-Assembly
- Cellulose Nanocrystals
- Chitin
- Antioxidant
- Nanocarriers
- Electrospinning
- Polyhydroxyalkanoates
- Biomaterials
- Tissue Engineering
- Nanocomposites
- Biomedical Applications
- Drug Delivery
- Biodegradable Polymers
- Nanofibers
- Polylactic Acid
- Polymer Nanofibers
- Nanoparticles
- Mechanical Properties
- Chitosan
- Nanocellulose
- Biodegradable Materials
- Peptide Amphiphiles
- Clay Nanotubes
- Silk Fibroin
- Bioinspired Materials
- Biomimetic Synthesis
- Collagen
- Calotropis procera
Size is the world's fractional works in 2021-25 in the topics tagged with each word; colour compares the word's share of this field with 2011-15. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 36 words, with their numbers
- Biomedical Applications87k◆ 1.09×7 topics
- Nanocomposites62k◆ 1.09×5 topics
- Drug Delivery46k◆ 0.98×4 topics
- Tissue Engineering46k◆ 1.10×5 topics
- Biodegradable Polymers32k▲ 1.22×2 topics
- Biomaterials27k◆ 1.09×4 topics
- Nanofibers26k◆ 0.99×2 topics
- Polyhydroxyalkanoates20k◆ 1.06×1 topic
- Polylactic Acid20k◆ 1.06×1 topic
- Electrospinning20k◆ 1.08×1 topic
- Polymer Nanofibers20k◆ 1.08×1 topic
- Nanocarriers15k◆ 0.94×1 topic
- Nanoparticles15k◆ 0.94×1 topic
- Antioxidant14k▲ 1.29×2 topics
- Mechanical Properties12k▼ 0.85×3 topics
- Chitin12k▲ 1.64×1 topic
- Chitosan12k▲ 1.64×1 topic
- Cellulose Nanocrystals11k▲ 1.30×1 topic
- Nanocellulose11k▲ 1.30×1 topic
- Self-Assembly9,991▼ 0.80×2 topics
- Biodegradable Materials6,408▼ 0.81×1 topic
- Magnesium Alloys6,408▼ 0.81×1 topic
- Peptide Amphiphiles6,210▼ 0.80×1 topic
- Supramolecular6,210▼ 0.80×1 topic
- Clay Nanotubes5,418▼ 0.83×1 topic
- Halloysite5,418▼ 0.83×1 topic
- Silk Fibroin5,386◆ 0.94×1 topic
- Spider Silk5,386◆ 0.94×1 topic
- Bioinspired Materials4,177▼ 0.78×1 topic
- Biomineralization4,177▼ 0.78×1 topic
- Biomimetic Synthesis3,780▼ 0.81×1 topic
- Peptide-Directed Materials3,780▼ 0.81×1 topic
- Collagen2,874▼ 0.80×1 topic
- Gelatin2,874▼ 0.80×1 topic
- Calotropis procera1,751▼ 0.52×1 topic
- Latex1,751▼ 0.52×1 topic
Which countries lead Biomaterials research?
On research quality in 2022-now, China, the United States and the United Kingdom rank highest in Biomaterials. By volume, China and India publish the most (32k and 11k works in 2022-now).
By research quality, 2022-now
- 1
China #1 all time 1.33× citation excellence · 1.30× journals · 100% breadth 14.4% top 10% · 28k works
- 2
United States #2 all time 0.97× citation excellence · 1.61× journals · 100% breadth 10.2% top 10% · 6.5k works
- 3
United Kingdom #4 all time 1.10× citation excellence · 1.45× journals · 100% breadth 11.2% top 10% · 1.6k works
- 4
Germany #3 all time 0.86× citation excellence · 1.42× journals · 100% breadth 7.7% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 5
Canada #9 all time 1.13× citation excellence · 1.20× journals · 100% breadth 11.8% top 10% · 1.3k works
- 6
South Korea #11 all time 1.02× citation excellence · 0.93× journals · 100% breadth 10.9% top 10% · 2.2k works
- 7
Australia #7 all time 1.28× citation excellence · 1.21× journals · 100% breadth 14.4% top 10% · 942 works
- 8
Spain #10 all time 1.06× citation excellence · 0.99× journals · 100% breadth 9.8% top 10% · 1.7k works
- 9
France #5 all time 0.76× citation excellence · 1.25× journals · 100% breadth 7.0% top 10% · 1.9k works
- 10
India #13 all time 0.85× citation excellence · 0.39× journals · 100% breadth 7.6% top 10% · 9.4k works
The track on each row is that row's top-10% rate. The ranking itself is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each place's own topics predict, adds its share of papers in the Nature Index journals, and counts output and breadth too.
Of 49 countries ranked in Biomaterials. Ranked on the quality score for 2022-now; the bracket is the all-time rank.
All countries ranked in BiomaterialsBy volume, 2022-now
- 1
China 32k works
- 2
India 11k works
- 3
United States 7.8k works
- 4
Iran 3.4k works
- 5
Japan 2.9k works
- 6
Brazil 2.8k works
- 7
South Korea 2.6k works
- 8
Indonesia 2.5k works
- 9
Germany 2.5k works
- 10
Türkiye 2.4k works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Biomaterials research?
Chinese Academy of Sciences (China) ranks first in Biomaterials on research quality in 2022-now, followed by Sichuan University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
By research quality, 2022-now
- 1
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China · Beijing · #1 all time 15.4% top 10% · 1.2k works
- 2
Sichuan University
China · Chengdu · #5 all time 16.3% top 10% · 611 works
- 3
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
China · Shanghai · #6 all time 17.8% top 10% · 412 works
- 4
Zhejiang University
China · Hangzhou · #11 all time 17.5% top 10% · 372 works
- 5
Harvard University
United States · Cambridge · #2 all time 17.4% top 10% · 108 works
- 6
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
China · Beijing · #3 all time 17.1% top 10% · 217 works
- 7
Chongqing University
China · Chongqing · #15 all time 16.5% top 10% · 239 works
- 8
South China University of Technology
China · Guangzhou · #14 all time 12.9% top 10% · 366 works
- 9
Peking University
China · Beijing · #17 all time 17.4% top 10% · 167 works
- 10
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France · Paris · #4 all time 7.0% top 10% · 849 works
The track on each row is that row's top-10% rate. The ranking itself is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each place's own topics predict, adds its share of papers in the Nature Index journals, and counts output and breadth too.
Of 270 institutions above the floor of 40 fractional works in Biomaterials.
Top 100 Biomaterials institutionsBy volume, 2022-now
- 1
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China 1.4k works
- 2
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France 983 works
- 3
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russia 958 works
- 4
Sichuan University
China 667 works
- 5
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
China 464 works
- 6
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
Iran 434 works
- 7
Zhejiang University
China 417 works
- 8
South China University of Technology
China 407 works
- 9
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
China 384 works
- 10
Nanjing Forestry University
China 376 works
Who are the leading researchers in Biomaterials?
Counting only their work in Biomaterials, David Lee Kaplan, Seeram Ramakrishna and Róbert Langer have the most papers in the world top 10% for their subfield and year beyond the 10% expected.
- 1
David Lee Kaplan
United States · #20,404 worldwide overall 143.0 of 485 papers here in the top 10%
- 2
Seeram Ramakrishna
Singapore · #2,487 worldwide overall 94.4 of 279 papers here in the top 10%
- 3
Róbert Langer
United States · #654 worldwide overall 72.2 of 152 papers here in the top 10%
- 4
Alain Dufresne
France · #79,755 worldwide overall 79.2 of 219 papers here in the top 10%
- 5
Yufeng Zheng
China · #8,273 worldwide overall 56.6 of 154 papers here in the top 10%
- 6
Ali Khademhosseini
United States · #1,961 worldwide overall 46.7 of 105 papers here in the top 10%
- 7
Kazunori Kataoka
Japan · #26,398 worldwide overall 46.8 of 134 papers here in the top 10%
- 8
Bin Ding
China · #4,003 worldwide overall 42.7 of 117 papers here in the top 10%
- 9
Orlando José Rojas
Finland · #46,025 worldwide overall 54.0 of 245 papers here in the top 10%
- 10
Stephen F. Badylak
United States · #6,523 worldwide overall 36.2 of 77 papers here in the top 10%
Ranked on their work in Biomaterials alone: how many more of their papers here reached the world top 10% for their subfield and year than the 10% expected, among 1,124,457 ranked researchers with a paper here. Each paper counts once, so many strong papers outrank one famous one, and a long record of ordinary papers does not climb. Identities come from OpenAlex author disambiguation, which occasionally merges or splits people.
Top 100 Biomaterials researchersWhere is Biomaterials research done?
The largest centres of Biomaterials research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Nanjing (China) and Guangzhou (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Pozzuoli and Iligan City.
Largest cities, 2022-now
Where it is the local speciality
- PozzuoliIT · 46.2 works19×
- Iligan CityPH · 147.6 works12×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Biomaterials than the world average.
Biomaterials research by country
The best places for Biomaterials research inside each country, with that country's researchers and world standing.
Where is the best place to study Biomaterials?
Among universities, judged by research, Sichuan University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences score highest, combining standing in the field's ranking, citation excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Rank in field (all time) | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sichuan University |
80.5 | #2 (#5) | 16.0% | 3.2× | 668 | +20.3% |
| 2 | Shanghai Jiao Tong University |
77.1 | #3 (#6) | 17.4% | 1.8× | 464 | +16.1% |
| 3 | University of Chinese Academy of Sciences |
76.2 | #6 (#3) | 16.6% | 1.6× | 247 | +3.9% |
| 4 | Harvard University |
75.0 | #5 (#2) | 16.6% | 0.4× | 121 | -23.7% |
| 5 | Zhejiang University |
71.7 | #4 (#11) | 16.6% | 1.7× | 417 | +19.6% |
| 6 | National University of Singapore |
69.0 | #18 (#9) | 18.5% | 1.6× | 168 | +10.0% |
| 7 | Chongqing University |
65.8 | #7 (#15) | 16.2% | 2.7× | 269 | +59.9% |
| 8 | University of Science and Technology of China |
64.6 | #12 (#13) | 17.3% | 1.6× | 178 | +23.7% |
| 9 | South China University of Technology |
64.2 | #8 (#14) | 12.7% | 4.1× | 407 | +2.0% |
| 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
63.9 | #15 (#8) | 19.5% | 1.1× | 73 | -24.1% |
| 11 | Peking University |
63.7 | #9 (#17) | 17.3% | 1.0× | 186 | +23.8% |
| 12 | ETH Zurich |
62.1 | #22 (#7) | 14.0% | 1.4× | 85 | -11.3% |
| 13 | Tsinghua University |
61.1 | #16 (#12) | 15.6% | 1.0× | 205 | +4.6% |
| 14 | Fudan University |
60.4 | #19 (#19) | 15.0% | 1.5× | 218 | +25.7% |
| 15 | Nanjing Forestry University |
59.7 | #24 (#39) | 14.6% | 9.1× | 376 | +57.2% |
| 16 | Jilin University |
59.5 | #11 (#44) | 18.6% | 3.0× | 315 | +25.1% |
| 17 | Nankai University |
58.9 | #14 (#21) | 17.1% | 2.4× | 152 | +11.1% |
| 18 | Wuhan University |
58.8 | #21 (#20) | 20.7% | 1.2× | 154 | +8.4% |
| 19 | Donghua University |
58.7 | #17 (#26) | 13.1% | 9.9× | 331 | +2.7% |
| 20 | Tongji University |
56.5 | #20 (#31) | 16.3% | 1.3× | 177 | +34.9% |
| 21 | Nanjing University |
55.2 | #13 (#34) | 16.7% | 1.6× | 134 | +40.0% |
| 22 | Nanyang Technological University |
53.3 | #36 (#24) | 19.1% | 1.1× | 82 | -19.9% |
| 23 | Northwest A&F University |
53.2 | #35 (#96) | 24.6% | 3.2× | 112 | +73.2% |
| 24 | Xi'an Jiaotong University |
51.7 | #29 (#64) | 17.7% | 1.2× | 185 | +37.8% |
| 25 | Sun Yat-sen University |
51.4 | #23 (#43) | 14.8% | 1.1× | 199 | +10.3% |
| 26 | Tianjin University |
51.3 | #44 (#30) | 13.5% | 1.8× | 204 | -0.8% |
| 27 | China Agricultural University |
50.4 | #42 (#86) | 19.6% | 2.4× | 121 | +91.2% |
| 28 | Harbin Institute of Technology |
49.6 | #34 (#60) | 15.3% | 1.2× | 183 | +21.8% |
| 29 | Cornell University |
49.3 | #38 (#22) | 12.4% | 0.8× | 96 | -14.1% |
| 30 | University of Toronto |
49.2 | #39 (#29) | 11.7% | 0.6× | 116 | -4.3% |
| 31 | Hunan University |
49.0 | #28 (#63) | 21.4% | 1.5× | 96 | +12.1% |
| 32 | University of Michigan |
48.7 | #54 (#23) | 12.2% | 0.5× | 74 | +5.1% |
| 33 | Soochow University |
48.1 | #41 (#52) | 10.3% | 3.1× | 276 | +4.0% |
| 34 | Huazhong University of Science and Technology |
47.8 | #37 (#77) | 15.4% | 1.2× | 192 | +25.4% |
| 35 | Jiangsu University |
47.7 | #61 (#234) | 24.0% | 3.0× | 220 | +85.8% |
| 36 | Shandong University |
47.6 | #26 (#73) | 12.2% | 1.8× | 212 | +30.0% |
| 37 | University of British Columbia |
47.3 | #40 (#92) | 13.4% | 1.3× | 147 | +21.7% |
| 38 | Central South University |
47.2 | #32 (#119) | 15.3% | 1.7× | 294 | +28.3% |
| 39 | City University of Hong Kong |
46.9 | - (#74) | 23.5% | 1.0× | 54 | +31.2% |
| 40 | The University of Queensland |
46.4 | #48 (#46) | 14.3% | 1.2× | 102 | -17.3% |
| 41 | Northeast Agricultural University |
44.0 | #98 (#308) | 27.4% | 4.8× | 113 | +135.1% |
| 42 | University of Shanghai for Science and Technology |
43.9 | #123 (#236) | 29.5% | 2.3× | 90 | +80.1% |
| 43 | University of Hong Kong |
43.1 | - (#62) | 19.3% | 0.8× | 64 | +2.2% |
| 44 | Kyung Hee University |
42.7 | #115 (#254) | 23.2% | 2.8× | 104 | +11.1% |
| 45 | KTH Royal Institute of Technology |
42.2 | #85 (#67) | 10.0% | 3.9× | 135 | -19.6% |
| 46 | Jiangnan University |
42.0 | #71 (#187) | 11.6% | 6.0× | 320 | +48.0% |
| 47 | Hong Kong Polytechnic University |
39.1 | #62 (#202) | 17.8% | 1.0× | 77 | +12.6% |
| 48 | Tianjin University of Science and Technology |
37.8 | #109 (#252) | 17.5% | 9.1× | 159 | +3.7% |
| 49 | Southern University of Science and Technology |
37.5 | #25 | 23.4% | 1.4× | 68 | +132.8% |
| 50 | RMIT University |
34.5 | - (#178) | 20.3% | 1.8× | 65 | -19.1% |
| 51 | Dalian Polytechnic University |
34.1 | #173 (#498) | 18.2% | 9.8× | 155 | +105.1% |
| 52 | Shandong Agricultural University |
33.0 | - (#445) | 23.5% | 3.8× | 62 | +63.4% |
| 53 | King Saud University |
32.6 | #204 (#514) | 11.1% | 2.1× | 186 | +73.4% |
| 54 | Wuhan Textile University |
32.6 | #126 (#344) | 11.6% | 9.4× | 128 | +55.7% |
| 55 | National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology |
31.9 | - (#214) | 12.5% | 15.8× | 57 | -5.3% |
| 56 | King Khalid University |
28.1 | - | 15.5% | 1.9× | 64 | +135.9% |
| 57 | Islamic Azad University, Tehran |
26.6 | #241 (#661) | 7.4% | 2.9× | 434 | +5.8% |
| 58 | Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology |
24.9 | - (#501) | 4.2% | 39.1× | 147 | +282.8% |
| 59 | Institute of Chemical Technology |
21.3 | #228 (#645) | 8.1% | 10.3× | 86 | -1.8% |
| 60 | Technical University of Liberec |
20.8 | - (#598) | 6.1% | 12.9× | 61 | +16.2% |
| 61 | University of Tennessee at Chattanooga |
13.9 | - | 4.5% | 12.1× | 57 | -8.2% |
Universities only. The score blends standing (50%), citation excellence (20%), size (15%), specialisation (5%), growth (5%), international reach (5%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise. Standing is the score in this field's institution ranking, three quarters over all time and a quarter 2022-now; excellence averages the two windows too. Four years alone undercount fields such as AI, where many conference and arXiv papers from 2022 on carry no affiliation in the data.
Every institution in Biomaterials, country by countryIs Biomaterials research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 24% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging, Diatoms and Algae Research and biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Biomaterials as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.43% in 2024.
Fractional works of Biomaterials over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
- Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging+49%
- Diatoms and Algae Research+49%
- biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties+37%
- Collagen: Extraction and Characterization+30%
- Advanced Cellulose Research Studies+28%
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications+26%
Growth in output from 2018-21 to 2022-25. Every topic is a page of its own.
What does Biomaterials include?
Area is fractional works in that topic. Every name below is a page of its own.
- Diatoms and Algae Research
- Clay minerals and soil interactions
- biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
- Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
- Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
- Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
- Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Biomaterials. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
