- Research works
- 32 ▲ 7% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 379 11.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 15.6% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 66% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Habeo+ is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Business, Management and Accounting, 6.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
Who are the top researchers at Habeo+?
Ranked on the composite score, Jeroen P Flamman lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Habeo+.
- 1 Jeroen P Flamman Netherlands · #910,318 worldwide 1 citations · 47 works
Which keywords describe research at Habeo+?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Injury Prevention, Risk Factors, Prevention, Muscle Injuries, Sports Injury, Rehabilitation and Education.
- Reference Intervals
- Phenomenology
- Literature
- ICF Model
- Rehabilitation
- Healthcare
- Sports Injury
- Prevention
- Injury Prevention
- Epidemiology
- Risk Factors
- Muscle Injuries
- Education
- History
- Cerebral Palsy
- Qualitative Research
- Museum
- Preanalytical Variables
- Social Sciences
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 19 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 19 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology7▲ 5.6×18 topics
- Injury Prevention4▲ 104×2 topics
- Risk Factors4▲ 11×3 topics
- Prevention3▲ 27×3 topics
- Muscle Injuries3▲ 188×1 topic
- Sports Injury3▲ 188×1 topic
- Education2▲ 4.5×5 topics
- Healthcare2▲ 6.5×3 topics
- History2▲ 5.8×2 topics
- Rehabilitation2▲ 13×4 topics
- Cerebral Palsy1▲ 54×1 topic
- ICF Model1▲ 105×1 topic
- Qualitative Research1▲ 6.2×2 topics
- Literature1▲ 6.3×1 topic
- Museum1▲ 339×1 topic
- Phenomenology1▲ 25×1 topic
- Preanalytical Variables1▲ 201×1 topic
- Reference Intervals1▲ 201×1 topic
- Social Sciences1▲ 19×1 topic
Which research topics does Habeo+ publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control, Service and Product Innovation, Legal and Policy Issues and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control Physiology 1 works
- 2 Service and Product Innovation Marketing 0 works
- 3 Legal and Policy Issues Law 0 works
- 4 Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
- 5 Educational and Organizational Development Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works
- 6 Diverse Applied Research Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 7 Digital Economy and Work Transformation Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 8 AI and HR Technologies Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works
- 9 Business, Innovation, and Economy Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 10 Digital Transformation in Law General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Habeo+'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 7% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Breda
- Amphia Ziekenhuis
- Netherlands Defence Academy
- Breda University of Applied Sciences
- Robert Bosch (Netherlands)
- Avans University of Applied Sciences
- Ignatius Hospital
- GGD West-Brabant
- DTV Consultants (Netherlands)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.