Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Company · New York · United States

IAC (United States)

In research, IAC (United States) stands highest in Agricultural and Biological Sciences (#1,594 of 6,031 worldwide), Life Sciences (#8,254 of 14,347 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#12,819 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Plant Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences — Plant Science is 7.3× its share of world research.

World rank, 2022–2025
#18,102
of 28,054 · #15,474 all time
Rank in United States
#2,606
of 4,192
Research works
1.6k
▲ 73% vs 2013–17
Citations
11k
7.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.6%
record average 16.5%
Open access
84%
world 28%

What is IAC (United States) known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Agricultural and Biological SciencesField #1,594 of 6,031 7.1%654
Life SciencesDomain #8,254 of 14,347 6.6%822
Physical SciencesDomain #12,819 of 21,541 11.7%352
Social SciencesDomain #11,751 of 16,945 11.1%195
Plant ScienceSubfield #2,298 of 2,837 7.4%372
Environmental ScienceField #5,951 of 6,208 7.1%126
Health SciencesDomain #19,796 of 20,462 3.8%191
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField #7,654 of 7,814 5.5%127
MedicineField #17,709 of 17,978 4.2%149

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where IAC (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

What does IAC (United States) specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Plant Science takes 7.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Plant ScienceSubfield · 20.1 works7.3×
  2. Agricultural and Biological SciencesField · 42.3 works5.6×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 5.62× its world share, 42 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.92× its world share, 8 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.70× its world share, 2 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.90× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemical Engineering: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.64× its world share, 8 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.01× its world share, 2 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.52× its world share, 1 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.42× its world share, 10 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.97× its world share, 8 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.12× its world share, 1 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.90× its world share, 3 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.83× its world share, 4 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.44× its world share, 13 worksMedicineNursing: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.83× its world share, 8 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.79× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.01× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2.72× its world share, 9 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.00× its world share, 5 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.34× its world share, 27 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 5.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at IAC (United States)?

Ranked on the composite score, Georges Canguilhem, Robert G. Mead and Dirceu Mattos lead among researchers whose main affiliation is IAC (United States).

  1. 1 Georges Canguilhem United States · #44,488 worldwide 287 citations · 32 works
  2. 2 Robert G. Mead United States · #193,200 worldwide 15 citations · 38 works
  3. 3 Dirceu Mattos United States · #814,521 worldwide 67 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Marcos Doniseti Michelotto United States · #1,013,042 worldwide 11 citations · 25 works
  5. 5 Luiz Gonzaga E. Lordello United States · #1,442,254 worldwide 8 citations · 16 works
All ranked researchers at IAC (United States)

Which keywords describe research at IAC (United States)?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Genetic Diversity, Drought Tolerance, Food Security, Nutrition, Soil Fertility, Climate Change, Plant Nutrition and Sustainability.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change8▲ 1.97×42 topics
  2. Sustainability8▲ 1.97×30 topics
  3. Globalization7▲ 2.2×22 topics
  4. Genetic Diversity6▲ 9.2×10 topics
  5. Environmental Impact5▲ 2.0×16 topics
  6. Drought Tolerance5▲ 24×7 topics
  7. Food Security5▲ 5.8×11 topics
  8. Education5▲ 1.76×16 topics
  9. Nutrition5▲ 6.6×8 topics
  10. Economic Growth4▲ 3.4×8 topics
  11. Soil Fertility4▲ 12×7 topics
  12. Plant Nutrition4▲ 25×3 topics
  13. Genetics4▲ 3.2×8 topics
  14. Agroecology3▲ 15×5 topics
  15. Cultural Studies3▲ 5.6×8 topics
  16. Domestication3▲ 41×3 topics
  17. Antioxidant3▲ 2.9×10 topics
  18. Biodiversity3▲ 2.6×12 topics
  19. Agriculture3▲ 4.7×8 topics
  20. Biological Control3▲ 12×6 topics
  21. Inequality3▲ 7.9×5 topics
  22. Invasive Species3▲ 4.3×10 topics
  23. Technology3▲ 3.4×6 topics
  24. Colonialism3▲ 3.6×9 topics
  25. Medicinal Plants3▲ 4.2×7 topics
  26. Morphological Parameters2▲ 77×1 topic
  27. Substrates2▲ 77×1 topic
  28. Financial Crisis2▲ 13×3 topics
  29. Monetary Policy2▲ 5.9×3 topics
  30. QTL Mapping2▲ 12×4 topics
  31. Structural Change2▲ 20×2 topics
  32. Welfare State2▲ 16×3 topics
  33. Host Specificity2▲ 12×3 topics
  34. Soil Management2▲ 33×2 topics
  35. Aggregate Demand2▲ 44×1 topic
  36. Income Distribution2▲ 38×1 topic
  37. Social Sciences2▲ 8.6×5 topics
  38. Soil Quality2▲ 29×2 topics
  39. Family Farming2▲ 32×1 topic
  40. Nitrogen Fixation2▲ 16×2 topics

Which research topics does IAC (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Growth and nutrition in plants, Economic Theory and Policy, Rural Development and Agriculture and Banana Cultivation and Research.

  1. 1 Growth and nutrition in plants Plant Science 2 works
  2. 2 Economic Theory and Policy General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 works
  3. 3 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
  4. 4 Banana Cultivation and Research Plant Science 2 works
  5. 5 Soil Management and Crop Yield Soil Science 2 works
  6. 6 Health and Lifestyle Studies General Health Professions 1 works
  7. 7 Botanical Research and Applications Food Science 1 works
  8. 8 Social Sciences and Policies General Social Sciences 1 works
  9. 9 Soybean genetics and cultivation Plant Science 1 works
  10. 10 Insect-Plant Interactions and Control Insect Science 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available83.6%not open16.4%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors38.4%domestic only61.6%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has IAC (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 73% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in New York

All research institutions in New York

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.