Illinois Archaeological Survey
In research, Illinois Archaeological Survey stands highest in Physical Sciences (#8,818 of 12,888 worldwide) and Environmental Science (#2,873 of 3,551 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Ecology — Ecology is 17.5× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #15,045 of 28,054 · #5,412 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,119 of 4,192
- Research works
- 3.7k ▼ 17% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 82k 21.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 15.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 28% world 28%
What is Illinois Archaeological Survey known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #8,818 of 12,888 | 14.2% | 119 | #3828 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #2,873 of 3,551 | 15.0% | 65 | #1062 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Illinois Archaeological Survey sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Illinois Archaeological Survey specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Ecology takes 17.5× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- EcologySubfield · 24.7 works18×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 11.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 11.3×
- Environmental Science 7.2×
- Veterinary 4.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.3×
- Chemical Engineering 1.3×
- Energy 0.9×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.9×
- Social Sciences 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Nursing 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Psychology 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities 0.1×
- Decision Sciences 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Health Professions 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Illinois Archaeological Survey?
Ranked on the composite score, Christopher A. Taylor, Timothy R. Paüketat and Thomas E. Emerson lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Illinois Archaeological Survey.
- 1 Christopher A. Taylor United States · #113,920 worldwide 251 citations · 26 works
- 2 Timothy R. Paüketat United States · #126,452 worldwide 116 citations · 35 works
- 3 Thomas E. Emerson United States · #145,068 worldwide 146 citations · 59 works
- 4 Robert J. Novak United States · #150,080 worldwide 164 citations · 39 works
- 5 Kevin S. Cummings United States · #181,233 worldwide 81 citations · 36 works
- 6 Floyd A. Huff United States · #218,507 worldwide 188 citations · 46 works
- 7 Michael L. Machesky United States · #252,375 worldwide 86 citations · 23 works
- 8 James R. Angel United States · #284,703 worldwide 92 citations · 24 works
- 9 Edward Heske United States · #297,758 worldwide 167 citations · 25 works
- 10 Mark A. Davis United States · #308,618 worldwide 151 citations · 42 works
Which keywords describe research at Illinois Archaeological Survey?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Invasive Species, Biodiversity, Habitat Fragmentation, Conservation, Population Dynamics, Biogeography and Ecosystem Services.
- Ecological Niche
- Genome Sequencing
- Conservation Challenges
- Monsoon Dynamics
- Glacial Cycles
- Tectonics
- Occupancy Rates
- Sea Level
- Genetic Diversity
- Radiocarbon Dating
- Agricultural Origins
- Fisheries Sustainability
- Conservation Biology
- Sediment Transport
- Phylogeny
- DNA Barcoding
- Biogeography
- Conservation
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Invasive Species
- Climate Change
- Biodiversity
- Remote Sensing
- Population Dynamics
- Ecosystem Services
- Habitat Selection
- Trophic Cascades
- Phylogenetic Analysis
- Freshwater Biodiversity
- Global Change
- Model Evaluation
- Pathogen Transmission
- Holocene
- Animal Movement
- Paleoclimatology
- Biological Control
- Global Warming
- Citizen Science
- Flow Regulation
- River Restoration
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change42▲ 8.6×54 topics
- Invasive Species17▲ 22×18 topics
- Biodiversity16▲ 12×19 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation11▲ 27×4 topics
- Remote Sensing10▲ 4.7×17 topics
- Conservation10▲ 13×17 topics
- Population Dynamics10▲ 21×11 topics
- Biogeography9▲ 19×16 topics
- Ecosystem Services8▲ 12×6 topics
- DNA Barcoding8▲ 26×9 topics
- Habitat Selection7▲ 52×2 topics
- Phylogeny7▲ 25×12 topics
- Trophic Cascades7▲ 39×2 topics
- Sediment Transport6▲ 22×4 topics
- Phylogenetic Analysis6▲ 11×12 topics
- Conservation Biology6▲ 32×4 topics
- Freshwater Biodiversity6▲ 55×2 topics
- Fisheries Sustainability6▲ 37×2 topics
- Global Change6▲ 13×6 topics
- Agricultural Origins6▲ 97×1 topic
- Model Evaluation6▲ 26×2 topics
- Radiocarbon Dating6▲ 97×1 topic
- Pathogen Transmission6▲ 46×3 topics
- Genetic Diversity5▲ 6.6×9 topics
- Holocene5▲ 25×2 topics
- Sea Level5▲ 30×2 topics
- Animal Movement5▲ 52×1 topic
- Occupancy Rates5▲ 52×1 topic
- Paleoclimatology5▲ 34×2 topics
- Tectonics5▲ 23×3 topics
- Biological Control5▲ 17×9 topics
- Glacial Cycles5▲ 39×1 topic
- Global Warming5▲ 6.3×9 topics
- Monsoon Dynamics5▲ 39×1 topic
- Citizen Science4▲ 25×3 topics
- Conservation Challenges4▲ 50×1 topic
- Flow Regulation4▲ 50×1 topic
- Genome Sequencing4▲ 14×2 topics
- River Restoration4▲ 54×2 topics
- Ecological Niche4▲ 38×1 topic
Which research topics does Illinois Archaeological Survey publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Archaeology and ancient environmental studies, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research and Fish Ecology and Management Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Archaeology and ancient environmental studies Paleontology 6 works
- 2 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 5 works
- 3 Geology and Paleoclimatology Research Atmospheric Science 5 works
- 4 Fish Ecology and Management Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 4 works
- 5 Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens Plant Science 4 works
- 6 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 4 works
- 7 Archaeology and Natural History Anthropology 3 works
- 8 Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 2 works
- 9 Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes Ecology 2 works
- 10 Plant and animal studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Illinois Archaeological Survey's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 17% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Champaign
- International Space Station
- Parkland College
- Wolfram Research (United States)
- Rao Research and Consulting (United States)
- American Dairy Science Association
- Committee on Institutional Cooperation
- CU Aerospace (United States)
- Nuclear Plasma Laboratories (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.