- Research works
- 20 ▼ 100% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 24 1.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 2.4% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 7% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Institut für Freizeitwissenschaft und Kulturarbeit is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Who are the top researchers at Institut für Freizeitwissenschaft und Kulturarbeit?
Ranked on the composite score, Frei Otto lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institut für Freizeitwissenschaft und Kulturarbeit.
- 1 Frei Otto Germany · #626,087 worldwide 4 citations · 26 works
Which keywords describe research at Institut für Freizeitwissenschaft und Kulturarbeit?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sustainable Development, Biosphere Reserves, Landscape Management, Philosophy, Ethics, Civil Engineering, Construction and Cultural History.
- Social History
- History
- Art
- Education
- Technology
- Cultural History
- Civil Engineering
- Philosophy
- Biosphere Reserves
- Sustainable Development
- Landscape Management
- Ethics
- Construction
- Identity
- Urban Planning
- Gender
- Aesthetics
- Media
- Philosophy of Education
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 19 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 19 words, with their numbers
- Sustainable Development9▲ 38×3 topics
- Biosphere Reserves6▲ 2688×1 topic
- Landscape Management6▲ 1980×1 topic
- Philosophy3▲ 36×4 topics
- Ethics3▲ 30×4 topics
- Civil Engineering2▲ 183×1 topic
- Construction2▲ 109×1 topic
- Cultural History2▲ 80×5 topics
- Identity2▲ 14×4 topics
- Technology2▲ 21×1 topic
- Urban Planning2▲ 121×1 topic
- Education2▲ 5.6×3 topics
- Gender2▲ 13×3 topics
- Art1▲ 84×2 topics
- Aesthetics1▲ 78×2 topics
- History1▲ 7.1×3 topics
- Media1▲ 43×2 topics
- Social History1▲ 55×2 topics
- Philosophy of Education1▲ 627×2 topics
Which research topics does Institut für Freizeitwissenschaft und Kulturarbeit publish most on?
By volume: Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies, Civil and Structural Engineering Research, Technology, Environment, Urban Planning and Art, Aesthetics, and Perception.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 6 works
- 2 Civil and Structural Engineering Research Civil and Structural Engineering 2 works
- 3 Technology, Environment, Urban Planning Philosophy 2 works
- 4 Art, Aesthetics, and Perception Visual Arts and Performing Arts 1 works
- 5 Sociology and Education Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 6 Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 7 Historical Architecture and Urbanism History 1 works
- 8 Libraries and Information Services Museology 0 works
- 9 European history and politics Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 10 Arts, Culture, and Music Studies Cultural Studies 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
How has Institut für Freizeitwissenschaft und Kulturarbeit's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 100% lower than in 2013–2017.
Other research institutions in Bremen
- University of Bremen
- Constructor University
- Praxis für Humangenetik
- Hochschule Bremen
- Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology
- Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials
- Klinikum Bremen-Mitte
- Leibniz-Institut für Werkstofforientierte Technologien - IWT
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.