Institute for Cognitive Prosthetics
- Research works
- 18 ▼ 82% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 118 6.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 32% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Institute for Cognitive Prosthetics is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which research topics does Institute for Cognitive Prosthetics publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Tracheal and airway disorders, Voice and Speech Disorders, Ocular Disorders and Treatments and Cleft Lip and Palate Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Tracheal and airway disorders Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
- 2 Voice and Speech Disorders Physiology 0 works
- 3 Ocular Disorders and Treatments Genetics 0 works
- 4 Cleft Lip and Palate Research Genetics 0 works
- 5 Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research Neurology 0 works
- 6 Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques Surgery 0 works
- 7 Dysphagia Assessment and Management Speech and Hearing 0 works
- 8 Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes Oral Surgery 0 works
- 9 Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments Urology 0 works
- 10 Dental Radiography and Imaging Oral Surgery 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institute for Cognitive Prosthetics's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 82% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Bala-Cynwyd
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.