Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso
In research, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,713 of 10,521 worldwide), Social Sciences (#4,291 of 6,365 worldwide) and Agricultural and Biological Sciences (#2,302 of 3,409 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Information Systems and Management and Education — Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law is 12.8× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #16,354 of 28,054 · #18,315 all time
- Rank in Brazil
- #299 of 714
- Research works
- 2.4k ▲ 140% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 7.3k 3.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 82% world 28%
What is Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,713 of 10,521 | 5.4% | 438 | #9785 | |
| Social SciencesField | #4,291 of 6,365 | 5.3% | 328 | #6330 | |
| Agricultural and Biological SciencesField | #2,302 of 3,409 | 4.7% | 116 | #1362 | |
| EducationSubfield | #1,459 of 1,892 | 6.4% | 167 | #2195 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #6,844 of 7,800 | 5.4% | 141 | #8168 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #11,805 of 12,888 | 3.9% | 204 | #16784 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #3,255 of 3,551 | 3.6% | 110 | #5146 | |
| Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield | #2,440 of 2,578 | 4.2% | 78 | #3882 | |
| Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawSubfield | #321 of 324 | 1.1% | 61 | #786 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#9,785 #6,713
- Social Sciences#6,330 #4,291
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences#1,362 #2,302
- Education#2,195 #1,459
- Life Sciences#8,168 #6,844
- Physical Sciences#16,784 #11,805
- Environmental Science#5,146 #3,255
- Sociology and Political Science#3,882 #2,440
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law#786 #321
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law takes 12.8× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawSubfield · 60.8 works13×
- Information Systems and ManagementSubfield · 27.0 works12×
- EducationSubfield · 166.9 works6.7×
- Literature and Literary TheorySubfield · 28.1 works6.5×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 3.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 3.8×
- Social Sciences 3.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3.0×
- Environmental Science 2.7×
- Arts and Humanities 2.4×
- Veterinary 0.7×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Chemistry 0.6×
- Psychology 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.5×
- Nursing 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.4×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Energy 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Dentistry 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso?
Ranked on the composite score, Marcelo Franco Leão, Geison Jader Mello and Thiago Beirigo Lopes lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso.
- 1 Marcelo Franco Leão Brazil · #240,789 worldwide 10 citations · 34 works
- 2 Geison Jader Mello Brazil · #498,507 worldwide 2 citations · 21 works
- 3 Thiago Beirigo Lopes Brazil · #652,279 worldwide 4 citations · 18 works
- 4 Epaminondas de Matos Magalhães Brazil · #722,594 worldwide 2 citations · 16 works
- 5 Rosemar Eurico Coenga Brazil · #811,676 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
- 6 Airton José Vinholi Júnior Brazil · #858,067 worldwide 0 citations · 17 works
- 7 Flávio Carlos Dalchiavon Brazil · #929,880 worldwide 7 citations · 21 works
- 8 Fabrício Ribeiro Andrade Brazil · #1,120,113 worldwide 23 citations · 16 works
- 9 Milson Evaldo Serafim Brazil · #1,412,990 worldwide 12 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Teacher Training, Qualitative Research, Curriculum Development, Public Policy, Online Learning, Social Inequality, Sustainability and Educational Reform.
- Educational Policy
- Social Movements
- Organizational Management
- Research Methods
- HIV/AIDS Prevention
- Educational Games
- Active Learning
- Social Participation
- Water Resources
- Environmental Education
- Digital Literacy
- Renewable Energy
- Science Education
- Critical Pedagogy
- Distance Learning
- Inclusive Education
- Educational Technology
- Online Learning
- Sustainability
- Qualitative Research
- Teacher Training
- Curriculum Development
- Public Policy
- Social Inequality
- Educational Reform
- Educational Policies
- Pedagogical Practices
- Sustainable Development
- Biodiversity
- Social Network Analysis
- WebQuests
- Waste Management
- Eco-friendly Practices
- Health Education
- Teaching Methodologies
- Didactic Models
- Agroecology
- Data Analysis
- Quantitative Research
- Inclusion
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Teacher Training147▲ 29×8 topics
- Qualitative Research93▲ 13×9 topics
- Curriculum Development92▲ 16×2 topics
- Sustainability88▲ 4.4×36 topics
- Public Policy76▲ 19×13 topics
- Online Learning74▲ 11×7 topics
- Social Inequality73▲ 34×4 topics
- Educational Technology61▲ 6.3×14 topics
- Educational Reform60▲ 57×2 topics
- Inclusive Education58▲ 20×9 topics
- Educational Policies58▲ 62×2 topics
- Distance Learning58▲ 21×5 topics
- Pedagogical Practices58▲ 78×2 topics
- Critical Pedagogy57▲ 81×1 topic
- Sustainable Development50▲ 3.9×15 topics
- Science Education49▲ 96×2 topics
- Biodiversity47▲ 7.7×18 topics
- Renewable Energy42▲ 3.6×15 topics
- Social Network Analysis41▲ 41×3 topics
- Digital Literacy40▲ 8.2×1 topic
- WebQuests40▲ 88×1 topic
- Environmental Education40▲ 32×4 topics
- Waste Management39▲ 12×5 topics
- Water Resources38▲ 19×4 topics
- Eco-friendly Practices37▲ 76×1 topic
- Social Participation37▲ 72×1 topic
- Health Education36▲ 10×4 topics
- Active Learning36▲ 24×2 topics
- Teaching Methodologies36▲ 32×2 topics
- Educational Games36▲ 44×2 topics
- Didactic Models36▲ 105×1 topic
- HIV/AIDS Prevention36▲ 105×1 topic
- Agroecology33▲ 28×4 topics
- Research Methods29▲ 21×2 topics
- Data Analysis26▲ 12×3 topics
- Organizational Management26▲ 48×1 topic
- Quantitative Research26▲ 23×1 topic
- Social Movements24▲ 9.9×7 topics
- Inclusion24▲ 20×3 topics
- Educational Policy24▲ 11×2 topics
Which research topics does Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education Pedagogy and Practices, Education and Digital Technologies, Environmental Sustainability and Education and Science and Education Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 57 works
- 2 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 40 works
- 3 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 37 works
- 4 Science and Education Research Education 36 works
- 5 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 26 works
- 6 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 23 works
- 7 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 19 works
- 8 Linguistics and Education Research Literature and Literary Theory 16 works
- 9 Agricultural and Food Sciences Forestry 14 works
- 10 Rural and Ethnic Education Education 14 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 140% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Cuiabá
- Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
- Universidade de Cuiabá
- Governo do Estado de Mato Grosso
- Empresa Mato-grossense de Pesquisa, Assistência e Extensão Rural
- Instituto Tropical de Medicina Reprodutiva
- Instituto Cuiabano de Educação
- Proteca (Brazil)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Mato Grosso
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.