Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie
In research, Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie stands highest in Physical Sciences (#10,733 of 21,541 worldwide), Health Sciences (#14,659 of 20,462 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#14,953 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #13,858 of 42,892
- Rank in Netherlands
- #172 of 464
- Research works
- 576 ▲ 29% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 8.5k 14.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 9.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 28% world 28%
What is Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #10,733 of 21,541 | 11.1% | 212 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #14,659 of 20,462 | 7.6% | 135 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #14,953 of 16,945 | 9.8% | 132 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Energy, 2.9×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Energy 2.9×
- Medicine 2.2×
- Arts and Humanities 2.2×
- Health Professions 2.1×
- Social Sciences 2.0×
- Psychology 1.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.1×
- Decision Sciences 1.0×
- Nursing 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.7×
- Neuroscience 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie?
Ranked on the composite score, Bram Van Oostveldt, Koos van Nugteren and P. Phariseau lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie.
- 1 Bram Van Oostveldt Netherlands · #653,168 worldwide 2 citations · 17 works
- 2 Koos van Nugteren Netherlands · #1,368,394 worldwide 1 citations · 175 works
- 3 P. Phariseau Netherlands · #1,502,602 worldwide 13 citations · 15 works
- 4 J. Stockx Netherlands · #1,552,204 worldwide 5 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Injury Prevention, Muscle Injuries, Sports Injury, Cultural Studies, Globalization and Gender.
- Welfare State
- Political Economy
- Education
- Stem Cells
- Cultural Diversity
- Nazi Propaganda
- Distal Radius Fractures
- Gender
- Sports Injury
- Injury Prevention
- Risk Factors
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Muscle Injuries
- Cultural Studies
- Climate Change
- Flexor Tendon Repair
- Sexuality
- Treatment
- Compartment Syndrome
- Pathophysiology
- Rhabdomyolysis
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 22 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 22 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology4▲ 3.3×12 topics
- Risk Factors2▲ 7.0×4 topics
- Globalization2▲ 3.7×5 topics
- Injury Prevention2▲ 51×2 topics
- Muscle Injuries2▲ 91×1 topic
- Sports Injury2▲ 91×1 topic
- Cultural Studies2▲ 14×2 topics
- Gender1▲ 9.2×2 topics
- Climate Change1▲ 1.77×8 topics
- Distal Radius Fractures1▲ 89×1 topic
- Flexor Tendon Repair1▲ 89×1 topic
- Nazi Propaganda1▲ 242×1 topic
- Sexuality1▲ 65×1 topic
- Cultural Diversity1▲ 19×2 topics
- Treatment1▲ 3.5×2 topics
- Stem Cells1▲ 15×2 topics
- Compartment Syndrome1▲ 246×1 topic
- Education1▲ 2.1×3 topics
- Pathophysiology1▲ 12×2 topics
- Political Economy1▲ 14×1 topic
- Rhabdomyolysis1▲ 246×1 topic
- Welfare State1▲ 42×1 topic
Which research topics does Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Sports injuries and prevention, European history and politics, Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation and Muscle and Compartmental Disorders.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Sports injuries and prevention Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 2 works
- 2 European history and politics Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 3 Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Surgery 1 works
- 4 Muscle and Compartmental Disorders Surgery 1 works
- 5 Social Policy and Reform Studies Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 6 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 1 works
- 7 Tendon Structure and Treatment Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1 works
- 8 Financial Crisis of the 21st Century Finance 1 works
- 9 Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 1 works
- 10 Vascular Procedures and Complications Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 29% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Amersfoort
- GGz centraal
- 's Heeren Loo
- Meander Medisch Centrum
- FrieslandCampina (Netherlands)
- Cultural Heritage Agency of Netherlands
- Royal HaskoningDHV (Netherlands)
- M&I/Partners
- SOMT University of Physiotherapy
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.