Laboratoire de recherche en droit
In research, Laboratoire de recherche en droit stands highest in Social Sciences (#10,489 of 10,521 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#6,360 of 6,365 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science — Political Science and International Relations is 9.2× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #27,994 of 28,054 · #42,831 all time
- Rank in France
- #1,407 of 1,422
- Research works
- 357 ▲ 352% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 32 0.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 3% world 28%
What is Laboratoire de recherche en droit known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #10,489 of 10,521 | 0.0% | 119 | #16878 | |
| Social SciencesField | #6,360 of 6,365 | 0.0% | 87 | #10194 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Laboratoire de recherche en droit sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Laboratoire de recherche en droit specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Political Science and International Relations takes 9.2× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Political Science and International RelationsSubfield · 20.6 works9.2×
- Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield · 39.3 works7.3×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 5.2×
- Social Sciences 4.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 3.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.7×
- Arts and Humanities 1.6×
- Psychology 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Decision Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Laboratoire de recherche en droit?
Ranked on the composite score, Laurence Camensuli-Feuillard, Gilles Raoul-Cormeil and Gildas Roussel lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Laboratoire de recherche en droit.
- 1 Laurence Camensuli-Feuillard France · #171,178 worldwide 0 citations · 53 works
- 2 Gilles Raoul-Cormeil France · #280,130 worldwide 0 citations · 133 works
- 3 Gildas Roussel France · #299,509 worldwide 0 citations · 49 works
- 4 Muriel Rebourg France · #323,641 worldwide 0 citations · 40 works
- 5 Dorothée Guerin France · #453,542 worldwide 1 citations · 31 works
- 6 Valère Ndior France · #456,196 worldwide 0 citations · 21 works
- 7 François-Xavier Roux-Demare France · #532,851 worldwide 0 citations · 28 works
- 8 Pierre-Édouard Weill France · #561,556 worldwide 3 citations · 25 works
- 9 Leost Raymond France · #568,288 worldwide 0 citations · 23 works
- 10 Karine Le Couviour France · #569,013 worldwide 0 citations · 22 works
Which keywords describe research at Laboratoire de recherche en droit?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Territorial Governance, Community Engagement, Local Development, Public Policy, Sustainable Development, Social Justice, Human Rights and Citizen Participation.
- Religion
- Islam
- European Company Law
- Inequalities
- Inequality
- Democracy
- Solidarity Economy
- Institutionalization
- Cooperatives
- Social Change
- Migration
- Legal Transplants
- Economic Development
- Healthcare Legislation
- Social Determinants of Health
- Mental Health
- Citizen Participation
- Social Justice
- Public Policy
- Community Engagement
- Territorial Governance
- Local Development
- Sustainable Development
- Human Rights
- Environmental Participation
- Globalization
- Palliative Care
- Patient Rights
- Gender Equality
- Healthcare Access
- Colonialism
- Citizenship
- Gender
- Social Innovation
- International Law
- Family Support Policies
- Healthcare Policy
- Family Law
- Regulatory Competition
- North Africa
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Territorial Governance24▲ 125×3 topics
- Community Engagement23▲ 47×2 topics
- Local Development23▲ 135×2 topics
- Public Policy23▲ 31×4 topics
- Sustainable Development20▲ 8.5×8 topics
- Social Justice20▲ 23×7 topics
- Human Rights17▲ 11×21 topics
- Citizen Participation16▲ 87×1 topic
- Environmental Participation16▲ 135×1 topic
- Mental Health13▲ 5.8×4 topics
- Globalization13▲ 4.3×19 topics
- Social Determinants of Health12▲ 36×2 topics
- Palliative Care11▲ 44×2 topics
- Healthcare Legislation10▲ 110×1 topic
- Patient Rights10▲ 90×1 topic
- Economic Development9▲ 7.3×4 topics
- Gender Equality9▲ 21×5 topics
- Legal Transplants8▲ 223×2 topics
- Healthcare Access8▲ 19×4 topics
- Migration8▲ 16×5 topics
- Colonialism8▲ 11×10 topics
- Social Change8▲ 42×3 topics
- Citizenship8▲ 41×2 topics
- Cooperatives8▲ 63×2 topics
- Gender7▲ 9.1×6 topics
- Institutionalization7▲ 53×3 topics
- Social Innovation7▲ 31×1 topic
- Solidarity Economy7▲ 77×1 topic
- International Law6▲ 14×11 topics
- Democracy6▲ 12×3 topics
- Family Support Policies6▲ 260×1 topic
- Inequality6▲ 18×1 topic
- Healthcare Policy6▲ 42×1 topic
- Inequalities6▲ 113×1 topic
- Family Law6▲ 80×2 topics
- European Company Law6▲ 274×1 topic
- Regulatory Competition6▲ 274×1 topic
- Islam5▲ 17×2 topics
- North Africa5▲ 93×2 topics
- Religion5▲ 7.4×2 topics
Which research topics does Laboratoire de recherche en droit publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: French Urban and Social Studies, Health, Medicine and Society, Social Sciences and Governance and Social Policies and Family.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 16 works
- 2 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 10 works
- 3 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 7 works
- 4 Social Policies and Family Sociology and Political Science 6 works
- 5 Healthcare Systems and Practices General Health Professions 6 works
- 6 Corporate Governance and Law Strategy and Management 6 works
- 7 Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender Political Science and International Relations 5 works
- 8 Criminal Law and Evidence Law 4 works
- 9 Corporate Insolvency and Governance Accounting 4 works
- 10 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Laboratoire de recherche en droit's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 352% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Brest
- Université de Bretagne Occidentale
- Ifremer
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest
- Laboratoire des Sciences et Techniques de l’Information de la Communication et de la Connaissance
- École nationale supérieure de techniques avancées Bretagne
- Centre de recherche bretonne et celtique
- French Corrosion Institute
- Laboratoire Chimie Electrochimie Moléculaires et Chimie Analytique
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.